SWOT Analysis PHINMA: Cost and Cement Plants Essay Example
SWOT Analysis PHINMA: Cost and Cement Plants Essay Example

SWOT Analysis PHINMA: Cost and Cement Plants Essay Example

Available Only on StudyHippo
View Entire Sample
Text preview

PHINMA’s presence in the Philippine cement industry began in 1956 when the company was founded by several Filipino investors, principally Mr. Ramon del Rosario Sr. and Engr. Filemon Rodriguez. It purchased ownership of Bacnotan Cement Co. from the government. In 1969, PHINMA constructed a second plant, the Davao Union Cement Co., under a turnkey agreement with F. L. Smidth of Denmark. In 1976, the Rizal Cement company, owned by the Madrigal family, came under the management of PHINMA under a management contract with the owners.

In 1978, General Luzon Cement (now Central Cement), a company foreclosed by PCI Bank, was purchased by PHINMA. In 1983, an expansion plant for the Davao Union Cement was constructed. In 1983, PHINMA also purchased the HI Cement company from the Yuchengco family. Finally, in 1988, the Madrigal Family acquired the Island Cement Company (now Solid Cement) from the government (AP

...

T), with PHINMA as a partner and manager of the plant. Each of PHINMA’s cement plant is owned by the company in partnership with different equity holders.

PHINMA had acquired considerable operating expertise in cement manufacturing over the years. PHINMA is thus far the only cement company in the Philippines that had demonstrated the capacity to design and construct its own cement plants using its in-house engineering group. The general practice in the industry is to contract cement plant construction to foreign suppliers under a “turnkey” agreement. In the latter, the contractor designs and constructs the entire plant and turns over to the owner a fully operating cement plant. Until 1991, all the cement plants in the Philippines were constructed in this manner.

SWOT Analysis

Strengths:

  1. Largest of the three major owner-groups of cemen
View entire sample
Join StudyHippo to see entire essay

companies

  • Accumulated experience of PHINMA in the cement industry
  • Technological culture of the company
  • Automated process controls
  • Automated raw material sampling and analysis
  • Considerable operating expertise inc cement manufacturing
  • PHINMA engineers have considerable experience in rehabilitating acquired cement plants or improving operating efficiency.
  • Significant amount of trust that top management has in the technical talent for their engineering group
  • Their engineers are being taught that money is earned in the field, not at the head office in Makati.
  • Invested in keeping its engineers up-to-date in cement-related technologies
  • Sending their engineers abroad to study or attend conferences of equipment manufacturers
  • Established formal R&D unit
  • $1 million in-house laboratory
  • Training facility for rank-and-file employees
  • As efficient as the Indonesians and Malaysians
  • Weaknesses:

    1. High energy costs
    2. Capital costs of conversion are high
    3. Cement plant requires a large financial investment currently ranging from $150-$200 million.
    4. P100 million worth of mistakes
    5. Government abetted
    6. Less efficient then Korean investors

    Opportunities:

    1. Expansion plant to reduce cost
    2. When a cement plant is efficiently constructed, the savings in plant construction cost translate into lower depreciation costs.
    3. Growth in domestic cement demand
    4. Non-engineers plant managers but with managerial skill
    5. Inviting foreign technical consultants
    6. Monopolize the industry
    7. Gain better control of their technology by fabricating some of the heavier pieces of equipment and castings currently being imported
    8. Compete with Vietnam and South China

    Threats:

    1. Thai cement producers
    2. Koreans investing in cement in the Philippines
    3. Government regulations
    4. Overcapacity exceeding local demand
    5. Oil crisis
    6. Cement shortage due to rising demand

    Alternative Courses of Action

    Design and build its own cement plants

    • Advantages: a. They will be able to save up to 20% b. They can choose the kind of equipment they like c.

    Less expensive d. 50% local content

  • Disadvantage: a. Technical know-how
  • Continue having turnkey agreement with foreign suppliers

    • Advantage: a. More automated processes b. Better equipment sourcing c. Capacity to manufacture some of the major pieces of the cement equipment.
    • Disadvantage: a. More expensive b. Adds around 20 percent to the cost c. Only 25% value would be local

    Strategy Formulation

    I conclude that the best solution to the problem is alternative no. which is to design and build its own cement plants because it will give pride to our country plus the company can save a lot compared to having an agreement with foreign suppliers.

    Plan of Action

    1. Continue organizing conferences for their engineers to learn more
    2. Expansion plants to reduce cost
    3. Hire non-engineers but with managerial skills
    4. Develop their R&D unit

    Potential Problems

    1. What if Korean investors will pursue their plan to invest here in the Philippines?
    2. What if there are no more qualified engineers to be hired?
    3. What if there will be oversupply of their product?

    Contingency Plans

    1. As they have said, they are still ahead even if they are less efficient because Koreans will be having higher costs than them. They should be precautious but then be confident enough and be proud of their locally-own made product.
    2. Train people with the capability of being a part of their company. Allot budget for those to study abroad and learn a lot.
    3. They should cope with the demand of the consumers. They should be aware how much is the demand so as for them to know how many they should produce.
    Get an explanation on any task
    Get unstuck with the help of our AI assistant in seconds
    New