Compare and Contrast Elie Weisel and Anne Frank Essay Sample

from the extract.

“Every twenty-four hours I feel…how beautiful nature is. how good the people are around me. how interesting this escapade is! ” Despite her distressing times. Anne persists at seeing the beauty in the universe. and the goodness in all around her.

This is what separates Anne non merely from Weisel. but besides from most other authors who wallow in their shoal pools of pessimism and ego sorrow non one time taking a measure back to look around and genuinely see how lucky they are.Another. more proficient difference in the two writers’ manners is their usage of tense.

With Anne Frank. her plants are written in present tense. apart from her brief contemplations of the events that took topographic point that twenty-four hours. An illustration is. “Dussell is a really nice adult male.

merely as we all imagined. ” In contrast with Weisel. the difference is presented through agencies of Night’s changeless usage of past tense. “The wheels began to land. We were on our manner. ” The ground for this difference is unmistakably due to the clip in the authors’ life whereupon it was decided to compose about their lives.

The tense has a big portion to make with the readers intake of what is written. as past tense tends to give of the feeling of a solid narrative. one in which an stoping is certain. With a narrated narrative. particularly narratives like Night in which the storyteller is presented with dangerous state of affairss. to hold it written in past tense gives the reader confidence that the storyteller makes it through his battles.

as it is he who is stating the

narrative. When covering with present tense. the reader is ever suspended within an opaque cloud of uncertainness sing the destiny of the storyteller.Therefore can be seen a few differences in manner between Elie Weisel’s Night.

and Anne Frank’s diary entries.As the two writers wrote their literature works under highly different fortunes. Anne Frank’s as simple diary entries and Elie Weisel’s as a prim and proper memoir. similarities in their authorship manner are highly difficult to come by.

So it is non that large a surprise to hold found but a individual. highly common similarity. the point of position. It is non surprising to happen that both Anne Frank and Elie Weisel wrote their pieces in first individual point of position as the topic of the Hagiographas was in fact the writer him/herself. Yet one may doubt that the pieces would genuinely hold the consequence they do should.

state. the pieces have been written in 3rd individual. The fact that they are both written this manner instantly personalises the reader with the state of affairss at manus. every bit good as straight feeds the reader all of the emotion and feelings of the character.Particularly when covering with such a tragic event like the holocaust.

a subsister may take to compose in 3rd individual so as non to to the full confront that which is in their yesteryear. but instead through the character they write about. Elie Weisel alternatively chose to face his devils face to face and live over his disturbing past through his ain eyes. straight for the reader. Anne Frank on the other manus.

non cognizing her authorship was to be read. merely followed

suit with all diary-keeping immature misss and worded it as if it were a simple conversation with her diary. Thus it can be seen that the two writers portion no facets of composing manner. apart from their composing point of position.The manner the two writers portray their narratives is to the full dependent on their experiences in life.

peculiarly the holocaust. Therefore as to whether or non their experiences are similar and/or different is genuinely of significance. Possibly the most seeable difference of their experiences. seen through their Hagiographas. is that while Anne Frank wrote her diary in concealing. before being sent to a concentration cantonment.

Weisel wrote his book old ages after the war was over. after lasting the horrors of the concentration cantonments. Important to observe is that Anne Frank did non last the concentration cantonments. and had perfectly no thought that her journal was to be found and publicised as it has.

Weisel nevertheless. lives on cognizing to the full that 1000000s of people have read his book and that his message has been received many times over. A farther difference in their experiences is that during the holocaust. and upon their enrollment at the cantonments.

they were evidently treated otherwise due to their differing genders. The fact that Weisel is male was likely a cardinal factor of his endurance in the cantonments. as females were considered by the Nazis to be by and large lame and useless. taking to their death.The difference between their emotional experiences.

at the clip of which their books severally speak. can be seen vividly through the undermentioned citation from Night. “The 1000s who died daily at

Auschwitz and at Birkenau in the crematorium ovens no longer troubled me. ” When compared to the undermentioned quotation mark from one of Anne Frank’s diary entries. “…I shall non stay undistinguished ; I shall work in the universe and for world! ” It can be seen that from sing life within the concentration cantonments and being around changeless decease.

Elie Weisel was emotionally dehumanised. Yet Anne on the other manus was obviously improbably passionate about life. every bit good as all of world. So it can be seen that Elie Weisel’s and Anne Frank’s physical. every bit good as emotional experiences had rather a few differences.There are besides rather a few similarities between the experiences of Anne Frank and the experiences of Elie Weisel.

First and first there is the unmistakeable similarity that both of them were Jews nowadays during the holocaust. significance that both of them went through huge favoritism. adversities and perfidy. Yet the most dramatic similarity between the two author’s experiences is how really spiritual they were.

In Night. Weisel negotiations of his spiritual pursuit. “…I had spent so many old ages of my life in my hunt for God ; in fasting in order to rush the coming of the Messiah…” One can see that both writers were improbably spiritual when compared to the undermentioned quotation mark from Anne Frank’s journal. “It is God that has made us as we are.

but it will be God. excessively. who will raise us up once more. ” Both Anne Frank and Elie Weisel were both on a hunt for God and expecting their salvation. This shows us that they both believed that

the immorality of the Nazis would surely finally be destroyed by agencies of greater good. and that within the two persons dwelled a invariable of the strongest sort.

hope.Elie Weisel and Anne Frank’s part to this Earth will everlastingly be remembered. as they left behind an kernel of lucidity amidst a sea of dense misinterpretation. The two writers so have similarities and differences in both composing manner.

every bit good as their single experiences. After taking a measure back and reflecting upon the entity that is our perceptual experience. both Anne Frank and Elie Weisel have gone their ain separate manner down a way taking past all else. and have managed to carry through that which merely a choice few of the ages have of all time accomplished – left an feeling within our really souls.