Child, Discipline, and Punishment Essay Example

propaganda advocating for its reinstatement. This is evident from documented crime statistics among children in the country both before and after its abolition (Better Health, 2016).

Undeniably, the elimination of corporal punishment has resulted in an increase in crime as children persist in repeating their mistakes into adulthood. Additionally, it is impractical to argue against the fact that throughout history, corporal punishment has effectively instilled discipline in children, given its long-standing use for thousands of years. Over this period, this method has successfully nurtured well-behaved and responsible children without causing any psychological damage.

According to critics, corporal punishment is perceived as physical abuse rather than a disciplinary measure. These critics often link this practice to aggression, substance abuse, and violence because many individuals who have experienced corporal punishment tend to repeat these abusive behaviors due to a lack of understanding. Overall, opponents argue that corporal punishment exposes children to physical abuse and teaches them that using physical violence is acceptable. The American Academy of Paediatrics (AAP) supports this perspective and asserts that corporal punishment contributes to an increase in criminal behavior. According to their report, the more children are spanked, the greater the likelihood they will become angry adults who perpetuate the cycle by spanking their own children. Additionally, these harmful experiences also raise the probability of supporting domestic violence and encountering marital conflicts among adults.

Recognizing the potential long-term consequences, it is crucial to acknowledge that punishing children may inadvertently hide future problematic behaviors that require early intervention. Human culture has traditionally embraced physical punishment, and even individuals known for their empathy might view present-day children as overly protected. In earlier times, institutions such as schools accepted

physical punishment. Nevertheless, critics contend that instead of imparting valuable lessons, physical punishment merely breeds resentment in children. When discipline is enforced through physical methods, children may internalize the idea that this approach is most effective for rectifying negative behavior. Consequently, these beliefs can persist into their adult relationships.

Opponents argue that children must comprehend the reasons behind their punishments to prevent cultivating hatred. It is crucial to recognize that as children mature, they begin comprehending some of the rationales behind their penalties. Previously, teachers employed physical punishments to discipline students at school. Although current laws in many states forbid using physical punishments, there are still advocates for reinstating them, asserting that such penalties deter negative behavior in children.

The lack of punishment is believed to be the main cause of the perceived issue of "kids run wild," and reintroducing physical punishment could potentially help solve this problem. Personally, I consider corporal punishment in children to be incorrect because it can harm them internally, externally, and emotionally. This can lead to children having scars and carrying these punishments into their marriages, resulting in violence between couples. Furthermore, physically abused children may develop mental disabilities as a result of beatings, disrupting their normal lives.

Works Cited

1. Better Health. "Discipline and children - Better Health Channel." 2015, www.betterhealth.vic.gov.au/health/healthyliving/discipline-and-children. Accessed 7 Dec. 2016.
2. Debate Wise. "Corporal Punishment should be reintroduced - DebateWise." 2016, debatewise.org/debates/547-corporal-punishment-should-be-reintroduced/. Accessed 7 Dec. 2016.
3. Learning-Knowledge. "Punishment." 2016,www.learning-knowledge.com/punishment.html.

Accessed on December 7th, 2016.