Ch. 4 POLS 229 – Flashcards

Unlock all answers in this set

Unlock answers
question
Due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment
answer
The idea that the state must use procedures under the law before depriving someone of life, liberty, or property and was created after the civil war
question
Selective Incorporation
answer
The process by which the Supreme Court makes certain parts of the Bill of Rights applicable through the Fourteenth amendment actions by state governments
question
Which of the following statements are true concerning the right of assembly:
answer
- Regulations of public assemblies must be applied fairly to all groups - Individuals cannot hold an assembly at a busy intersection during rush hour - Public officials can regulate the time and place of assemblies
question
The Patriot Act
answer
The law passed by Congress, soon after 9/11 attacks, that allows the FBI and other intelligence agencies to access personal information and records without consent from targeted individuals
question
Establishment Clause
answer
Government may not favor one religion over another or support religion over no religion and bans the state from helping religious institutions also restricts the establishment of an official religion
question
Free-exercise Clause
answer
Americans are free to hold any religious belief of their choosing and bans the state from restricting the free practice of any religion
question
Roe vs Wade
answer
- 1973 - Abortion - Gave women full freedom to choose abortion during the first three months (1st trimester) of pregnancy
question
Free speech is usually protected in the United States unless it :
answer
- Presents a clear and present danger to others - leads to imminent and lawless action - Involves false commercial advertising claims
question
In following the Eighth Amendment, the Supreme Court has used ____, ____, and ____ test to determine if an action constitutes cruel and unusual punishment
answer
- Determining whether a punishment is "disproportionate to the offense" - Determining if a punishment is "unnecessarily cruel" - Determining if a punishment violates "fundamental standards of good conscience fairness"
question
Regarding freedom of the press, the Supreme Court has generally upheld the principle of no prior restraint. This principle means that:
answer
Government generally cannot stop the news media from reporting a story
question
Symbolic Speech
answer
Action not words, still protected by the 1st amendment
question
Bill of Rights
answer
Ratified in 1791, the first ten amendments lists a set of rights that the federal government is obliged to protect
question
1st Amendment
answer
Freedom of Speech, Press, Assembly and Religion
question
2nd Amendment
answer
The right to bear arms, and protects a well-regulated militia
question
4th Amendment
answer
Protection against unreasonable search and seizure
question
5th Amendment
answer
Protection against self-incrimination or double jeopardy
question
6th Amendment
answer
Right to jury trial, right to an attorney, and right to confront witnesses
question
8th Amendment
answer
Protection against cruel and unusual punishment
question
10th Amendment
answer
Due process Clause from Federal
question
Libel
answer
A false written statement about other people that harms their reputation
question
Slander
answer
A false verbal statement about other people
question
Freedom of Expression
answer
The right of individual Americans to communicate thoughts of their choosing
question
Imminent Lawless Action
answer
An imposing barrier to any government attempt to restrict speech The test: - has two criteria for speech advocating the unlawful use of force to be prohibited - says that speech must be likely to produce lawless action - says that for speech to be restricted, it must be directed at inciting or producing imminent lawless action
question
The establishment clause and free-exercise clause are related to :
answer
Religion
question
Why was the National Security Agency's wiretapping of phone calls and email messages originating in the United States, first revealed by The New York Times in 2005, controversial?
answer
The wiretapping had been authorized by President George W. Bush without approval from the courts. The wiretapping was specifically prohibited by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978.
question
Lemon Test
answer
- Created after Lemon vs. Kurtzman - 3 point test - States that the policy must have non-religious purpose, the principle must be one that neither advances nor inhibits religion, and the policy must not foster "an excessive government entanglement with religion"
question
Inevitable Discovery Exception
answer
- States that exclusion of physical evidence that would have been found anyway has no effect on fairness of a trial - Allows admission of tainted evidence in certain cases - was developed in the case of Nix vs. Williams (1984)
question
Plain View Exception
answer
Excludable evidence can be admitted in trial if discovered in plain sight in the process of arresting a suspect for another infraction - created in Whren vs. United States (1996)
question
Since the 1950s, what has been the government's approach to free speech?
answer
- The Supreme Court has ruled that spoken words do not pose a true threat to national security, so Americans can speak their minds politically - Not a single individual has been convicted solely for criticizing the government's war policies - The Supreme Court has ruled that national security must truly be at risk before the government can limit speech
question
True statements about libel and slander
answer
- Public officials can usually be criticized freely without fear the writer or speaker will have to pay for damages due to libel or slander. - Laws on libel and slander are based on assumption that society has an interest in encouraging media and citizens to express themselves freely
question
The Sedition Act of 1798
answer
Made it a crime to print harshly critical newspaper articles about the president
question
Under the 5th Amendment, suspects:
answer
charged with a federal crime cannot be tried unless indicted by a grand jury
question
Racial Profiling
answer
Is the targeting of individuals from particular groups, such as Blacks, Hispanics, and Muslims.
question
Miranda vs. Arizona (1966)
answer
- Incorporated the Miranda Rights - Protects the right to remain silent , and the right to an attorney
question
Miranda Warning
answer
1. You have the right to remain silent. 2. Anything you say can and will be used against you in the court of law. 3. You have the right to talk to a lawyer, and have him/her present with you while you are being questioned. 4. If you cannot afford a lawyer, one will be appointed to represent you before questioning, if you wish. 5. You can decide at any time to exercise these rights and not answer any questions or make any statements *created in Kansas City, Missouri* *must knowingly and willingly waive rights*
question
Exclusionary Rule
answer
The legal principle that the government is prohibited from using evidence that was obtain unconstitutionally in trials - was adopted in Weeks vs. USA (1914) - was incorporated in Mapp vs. Ohio (1961)
question
Weeks vs. USA (1914)
answer
" the tendency of those who execute the criminal laws of the country to obtain convictions by means of unlawful searches and enforced confessions... Should find no sanction in the judgment of courts" - Adopted the "exclusionary rule"
question
Mapp vs. Ohio (1961)
answer
- Incorporated the "exclusionary rule" and made it applicable to the states
question
United States vs. Leon (1984)
answer
Ruled that evidence discovered under a faulty warrant was admissible because the police acted in "good faith" - created the "good faith exception"
question
Good Faith Exception
answer
Excludable evidence can be admitted in trial if police believed they were following proper procedures
question
Incarceration Rates in the United States
answer
The number of federal and state prisoners has more than doubled since 1990. The United States has the largest prison population in the world on a per capita basis. Most state legislatures have enacted stiffer criminal penalties in the past two decades.
question
Reconstruction Act
answer
Placed southern states under military rule until they ratified the 14th amendement
question
New York Times Co vs. United States
answer
Ruled that prior restraint is unconstitutional without a compelling argument for the restriction
question
Prior Restraint
answer
Government prohibition of speech or publication before it occurs
question
The Supreme Court determined that privacy rights extended to consensual activity between same-sex partners in
answer
Lawrence vs. Texas
question
Which legal provision requires law enforcement officials to appear before a judge to specify the reason detaining an individual
answer
Writ of habeas corpus
question
The Supreme Court consistently rules that the George W. Bush administration's practice of denying constitutional and legal protections to enemy combatants was:
answer
Within the president's power as commander-in-chief
question
Gitlow vs. New York
answer
Ruled that states do not have complete power over what their residents can legally say
question
1917 Espionage Act
answer
Prohibited forms of dissent that could have harmed the nations effort in WWI
question
Engel vs. Vitale (1962)
answer
Held that the establishment clause prohibits the reciting of prayers in public schools
question
Wall of Separatine Doctrine
answer
A strict separation of church and state
question
Accommodation Doctrine
answer
Allows government to aid religious activity if no preference is shown toward a particular religion and if assistance it is of non-religious nature
question
Columbia vs. Heller
answer
Ruled that the second amendment protects an individual (s) right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in the militia and to use that arm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense in one's home [federal]
question
McDonald vs. Chicago
answer
The Supreme Court through selective incorporation applied the Heller standard to state and local law
question
Griswold vs. Connecticut
answer
Challenged state law prohibition of the use of contraceptives such as condoms or birth control even by married couples. The Court ruled that individuals have a " Zone of [personal] privacy" that the government cannot lawfully invade "emanations" led to "penumbras" which contained a generalized right to privacy
question
Webster vs. Reproductive Health Services
answer
Prohibited abortions from happening in state funded medical facilities
question
Planned Parenthood vs. Casey (1992)
answer
Pennsylvania created law that requires a minor to have a parent or guardian consent before obtaining an abortion
question
Gonzales vs. Carhart (2007)
answer
Supreme Court held a ban on the use of a particular type of abortion, act was called the "Federal Partial-Birth Ban Act"
question
Bowers vs. Hardwick (1986)
answer
Supreme Court held that the right of privacy did not extend to consensual sexual relations among adults of the same sex.
question
Procedural due process
answer
Refers to the procedures that authorities must follow before a person can lawfully be punished for an offense.
question
Riley vs. California & United States vs. Wurie
answer
Police can search and seize physical evidence but they cannot search or seize contents of a cell phone without a warrant
question
Johnson vs. Zebst (1938)
answer
Criminal defendants in federal cases must be provided a lawyer at government expense if they cannot afford one
question
Gideon vs. Wainwright 1963
answer
Incorporated full right to counsel Rejected and overruled the "special circumstances rule"
question
Powell vs. AL 1932
answer
Incorporated access to counsel Special Circumstances rule
question
Indianapolis vs. Edmund
answer
Ruled that narcotic roadblocks serve a general law enforcement purpose rather than one specific to highway safety and therefore violates the 4th Amendment requirement that police must have a warrant
question
Felker vs Turpin (1996)
answer
law is designed to prevent frivilous and multiple federal court appeals: inmates can have multiple state appeals and only one federal appeal
question
Escobedo vs. Illinois (1964)
answer
extended the right to counsel to the custodial stage merged 6th and 5th amendment
Get an explanation on any task
Get unstuck with the help of our AI assistant in seconds
New