APUSH Important Supreme Court Cases (Angileri)
Unlock all answers in this set
Unlock answersquestion
            Marbury v. Madison (1803)
answer
        Established the power of the Supreme Court to declare an act of Congress or of the executive branch unconstitutional (judicial review)
question
            McCulloch v. Maryland (1819)
answer
        Expanded Congress's ability to use its implied powers
question
            Trustees of Dartmouth College v. Woodward
answer
        Held that the Constitution protects private charters
question
            Cohens v. Virginia (1821)
answer
        Ruled that a state court's decision is subject to review by the U.S. Supreme Court
question
            Gibbons v. Ogden (1824)
answer
        Broadened the definition of commerce and established that a state cannot interfere with Congress's right to regulate interstate commerce.
question
            Commonwealth v. Hunt (1842)
answer
        Ruled that workers have the right to organize
question
            Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857)
answer
        Ruled that African Americans cannot be U.S. citizens and that Congress has no power to forbid slavery in U.S. territories
question
            Ex parte Milligan (1866)
answer
        Limited the President's power to suspend the writ of habeas corpus
question
            Munn v. Illinois (1877)
answer
        Established that states may regulate privately owned businesses in the public's interest
question
            Plessy v. Ferguson (1896)
answer
        Ruled that separate but equal facilities for African Americans are constitutional
question
            Schenck v. United States (1919)
answer
        Held that the clear-and-present danger principle should be used as the test of whether a government may limit free speech
question
            Gitlow v. New York (1925)
answer
        Held that 1st amendment rights to freedom of speech applied to states as well as the federal government
question
            Patton v. United States (1930)
answer
        Upheld the 6th amendment's requirements for a jury trial in federal courts
question
            Near v. Minnesota (1931)
answer
        Held that the guarantee of a free press does not allow a prior restraint on publication, except in extreme cases, such as during wartime
question
            Chaplisky v. New Hampshire (1942)
answer
        Ruled that insults and fighting words--like profanity and libel -- are not protected by the 1st amendment
question
            West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette (1943)
answer
        Held that a school's required flag salute violated the 1st amendment's guarantees of freedom of religion
question
            Everson v. Board of Education (1947)
answer
        Maintained that although public funds could be used to bus children to parochial schools, the wall separating church and state must be kept high and strong.
question
            Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka (1954)
answer
        Ruled that separation of the races in public schools is unconstitutional; reversed the Plessy v. Ferguson decision
question
            Mapp v. Ohio (1961)
answer
        The Court ruled that evidence seized illegally could not be used in state courts. This is called the exclusionary rule.
question
            Baker v. Carr (1962)
answer
        Established the principle of \"one person, one vote\" and made such patterns of representation illegal. The Court asserted that the federal courts had the right to tell states to reapportion their districts for more equal representation.
question
            Engle v. Vitale (1962)
answer
        Held that public schools cannot require students to say prayers
question
            Edwards v. South Carolina (1963)
answer
        Ruled that 14th amendment doesn't permit a state to prohibit the peaceful expression of unpopular views
question
            Gideon v. Wainwright (1963)
answer
        Held that defendants have the right to be represented by counsel in state trails and that lawyers must be provided to defendants who cannot afford to pay for them.
question
            Eschobedo v. Illinois (1964)
answer
        The justices ruled that an accused person has a right to have a lawyer present during questioning by police
question
            Wesberry v. Sanders (1964)
answer
        Ruled that congressional districts within states should be as nearly equal as possible.
question
            Reynolds v Sims (1964)
answer
        Held that \"one person, one vote\" must apply to apportionment of both houses of a state legislature.
question
            Grisworld v. Connecticut (1965)
answer
        Ruled that the Constitution did guarantee certain zones of privacy
question
            Miranda v. Arizona (1966)
answer
        Declared that if accused persons have not been informed of their right to remain silent, then any statements they make may not be used as evidence against them
question
            Sheppard v. Maxwell (1966)
answer
        Overturned a murder conviction based on unfair pretrial publicity and ordered a new trial
question
            Katz v. United States (1967)
answer
        Expanded the 4th amendment protection against illegal searches to cover electronic surveillance
question
            Terry v. Ohio (1968)
answer
        Upheld the police practice of \"stop and risk\" when an officer suspects a crime is about to be committed
question
            Tinker v. Des Moines School District (1969)
answer
        Ruled that schools would need to show evidence of the possibility of substantial disruption before students' free speech at school could be limited
question
            Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971)
answer
        Established a three-part test to determine whether state aid to parochial schools was constitutional
question
            New York Times Co. v. United States (1971)
answer
        Affirmed the 1st amendment guarantee of a free press and limited \"prior restraint\" of the press
question
            Miller v. California (1973)
answer
        Attempted to clarify 1st amendment rights by defining obscenity
question
            Roe v. Wade (1973)
answer
        Established a woman's legal right to an abortion under certain circumstances
question
            United States v. Nixon (1974)
answer
        Limited the scope of a President's use of executive privilege
question
            Gregg v. Georgia (1976)
answer
        Established that the death penalty does not necessarily violate the Constitution
question
            Regents of the University of California v. Bakke (1978)
answer
        Held that colleges and universities may consider a person's race as one factor in admission policies
question
            Rostker v. Goldberg (1981)
answer
        Upheld the decision of Congress to exclude women from the military draft
question
            Island Trees School District v. Pico (1982)
answer
        Limited a school board's powers to remove books from its school library
question
            Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Chadha (1983)
answer
        Disallowed the legislative veto
question
            New Jersey v. T.L.O. (1986)
answer
        Established a \"reasonable suspicion\" rule for school searches
question
            South Dakota v. Dole (1986)
answer
        Upheld the federal government's right to attach strings to highway funds to states.
question
            Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier (1988)
answer
        Affirmed that school administrators could censor official school publications
question
            Texas v. Johnson (1989)
answer
        Ruled that a state law against flag burning was an unconstitutional limit on freedom of expression
question
            Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Dept. of Health (1990)
answer
        Clarified the need to have \"clear and convincing\" evidence that an individual would have wanted to die before intravenous feeding could be terminated
question
            Westside Community Schools v. Mergens (1990)
answer
        Ordered a school to permit students to meet on campus and discuss religion because it does not amount to a \"state sponsorship of a religion\"
question
            Clinton v. City of New York (1998)
answer
        Overturned the Line-Item Veto Act