question

civil liberties

answer

the legal constitutional protections against government. Although our civil liberties are formally set down in the Bill of Rights, the courts, police, and legislatures define their meanings.

question

Bill of Rights

answer

the first 10 amendments to the U.S. Constitution, which define such basic liberties such as press and guarantee defendants' rights

question

first amendment

answer

The constitutional amendment that establishes the four great liberties: freedom of the press, of speech, of religion, and of assembly.

question

Barron vs. Baltimore

answer

The 1833 supreme court decision holding that the Bill of Rights restrained only the national government, not the states and cities

question

Giltow v. New York

answer

The 1925 Supreme Court decision holding that freedoms of press and speech are "fundamental personal rights and liberties protected by the due process clause of the fourteenth amendment from impairment by the states" as well as by the national government

question

fourteenth amendment

answer

the constitutional amendment adopted after the Civil War that states, "no state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."

question

due process clause

answer

part of the fourteenth amendment guaranteeing that persons cannot be deprived of life, liberty, or property by the U.S. or state governments without due processes of the law.

question

incorporation doctrine

answer

the legal concept under which the Supreme Court has nationalized the Bill of Rights by making most of its provisions applicable to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment

question

establishment clause

answer

Part of the First Amendment stating that "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion."

question

free exercise clause

answer

A First Amendment provision that prohibits government from interfering with the practice of religion

question

Lemon v. Kurtzman

answer

The 1971 Supreme Court decision that established that aid to church-related schools must (1) have a secular legislative purpose (2) have a primary effect that neither advances nor inhibits religion (3) not foster excessive government entanglement with religion

question

Engel v. Vitale

answer

The 1962 Supreme Court decision holding that state officials violated the First Amendment when they wrote a prayer to be recited by New York's schoolchildren

question

School District of Abington Township, Pennsylvania v. Schempp

answer

A 1963 Supreme Court decision holding that a Pennsylvania law requiring Bible reading in schools violated the establishment clause of the First Amendment.

question

prior restraint

answer

a government preventing material from being published. This is a common method of limiting the press in some nations, but it is usually unconstitutional in the U.S., according to the First Amendment and as conformed by the 1931 Supreme Court case of Near v. Minnesota

question

Near v. Minnesota

answer

The 1931 Supreme Court decision holding that the First Amendment protects newspapers from prior restrain

question

Schenck v. U.S.

answer

A 1919 decision upholding the conviction of a socialist who had urged young men to resist the draft during the World War I. Justice Holmes declared that government can limit speech if the speech provokes a "clear and present danger" of substantive evils

question

Zurcher v. Stanford Daily

answer

A 1978 Supreme Court decision holding that a proper search warrant could be applied to a newspaper as well as to anyone without necessarily violating the First Amendment rights to freedom of the press

question

Roth v. U.S.

answer

A 1957 Supreme court decision ruling that "obscenity is not within the area of constitutionally protected speech or press."

question

Miller v. California

answer

A 1973 Supreme Court decision that avoided defining obscenity by holding that community standards be used to determine whether material is obscene in terms of appealing to a "prurient interest" and being "patently offensive" and lacking in value.

question

libel

answer

the publication of false or malicious statements that damage someone's reputation.

question

Texas v. Johnson

answer

A 1989 case in which the Supreme Court struck down a law banning the burning of the American flag on the grounds that such action was symbolic speech protected by the First Amendment.

question

symbolic speech

answer

nonverbal communication, such as burning a flag or wearing an armband. The Supreme Court has accorded some symbolic speech protection under the first amendment.

question

commercial speech

answer

communication in the form of advertising. It can be restricted more than many other types of speech but has been receiving increased protection from the Supreme Court

question

Miami Herald Publishing Company v. Tornillo

answer

a 1974 case in which the Supreme Court held that a state could not force a newspaper to print replies from candidates it had criticized, illustrating the limited power of government to restrict the print media

question

Red Lion Broadcasting Company v. Federal Communications Commission

answer

A 1969 case in which the Supreme Court upheld restrictions on radio and television broadcasting. These restrictions on the broadcast media are much tighter than those on the print media because there are only a limited number of broadcasting frequencies available.

question

NAACP v. Alabama

answer

The Supreme Court protected the right to assemble peaceably in this 1958 case when it decided the NAACP did not have to reveal its membership list and thus subject its members to harassment

question

probable cause

answer

The situation occurring when the police have reason to believe that a person should be arrested. In making the arrest, police are allowed legally to search for and seize incriminating evidence.

question

unreasonable searches and seizures

answer

obtaining evidence in a haphazard or random manner, a practice prohibited by the Fourth Amendment, Probable cause and/or a search warrant are required for a legal and proper search for and seizure of incriminating evidence

question

search warrant

answer

a written authorization from a court specifying the area to be searched and what the police are searching for.

question

exclusive rule

answer

the rile that evidence, no matter how incriminating, cannot be introduced into a trial if it was not constitutionally obtained. The rule prohibits use of evidence obtained through unreasonable search and seizure

question

Mapp v. Ohio

answer

The 1961 Supreme Court case decision ruling that the Fourth Amendment's protection against unreasonable search and seizures must be extended to the states as well as to the federal government

question

Fifth Amendment

answer

A constitutional amendment designed to protect the rights of persons accused of crimes, including protection against double jeopardy, self-incrimination, and punishment without due process of law

question

self-incrimination

answer

the situation occurring when an individual accused of a crime is compelled to be a witness against himself or herself in court. The Fifth Amendment forbids self-incrimination

question

Miranda v. Arizona

answer

the 1966 Supreme Court decision that sets guidelines for police questioning of accused persons to protect them against self-incrimination and to protect their right to counsel

question

Sixth Amendment

answer

a constitutional amendment designed to protect individuals accused of crimes. It includes the right to counsel, the right to confront witnesses, and the right to a speedy and public trial

question

Gideon v. Wainwright

answer

the 1963 Supreme Court decision holding that anyone accused of a felony where imprisonment may be imposed, however poor he or she might be, has a right to a lawyer

question

plea bargaining

answer

a bargain struck between the defendant's lawyer and the prosecutor to the effect that the defendant will plead guilty to a lesser crime (or fewer crimes) in exchange for the state's promise not to prosecute the defendant for a more serious (or additional) crime

question

Eighth amendment

answer

the constitutional amendment that forbids cruel and unusual punishment, although it does not define this phrase. Though the Fourteenth amendment, this bill of rights provision applies to the states

question

cruel and unusual punishment

answer

court sentences prohibited by the 8th amendment. Although the Supreme Court has ruled that mandatory death sentences for certain offenses are unconstitutional, it has not held that the death penalty itself constitutes cruel and unusual punishment

question

Gregg v. Georgia

answer

the 1976 Supreme Court decision that upheld the constitutionality of the death penalty, stating," it is an extreme sanction, suitable to the most extreme of crimes." The court did not, therefore, believe that the death sentence constitutes cruel and unusual punishment

question

McCleskey v. Kemp

answer

the 1987 Supreme Court decision that upheld the constitutionality of the death penalty against charges that it violated Fourteenth Amendment because minority defendants were more likely to receive the death penalty than were White defendants.

question

right to privacy

answer

the right to a private personal life free from the intrusion of government

question

Roe v. Wade

answer

the 1973 Supreme Court decision holding that a state ban on all abortions was unconstitutional. The decision forbade state control over abortions during the first trimester of pregnancy, permitted states to limit abortions to protect the mother's health in the second trimester, and permitted states to protect the fetus during the third trimester

question

Planned Parenthood v. Casey

answer

a 1992 case in which the Supreme Court loosened its standard for evaluating restrictions on abortion from one of "strict scrutiny" of any restrains on a "fundamental right" to one of "undue burden" that permits considerably more regulation.

question

Zelman v. Simmons-Harris

answer

the 2002 Supreme Court decision that upheld a state providing families with vouchers that could be used to pay for tuition at religious schools

question

New York Times v. Sullivan

answer

decided in 1964, this case established the guidelines for determining whether public officials and public figures could win damage suits for libel. To do so, individuals must prove that the defamatory statements were made with "actual malice" and reckless disregard for the truth

AP US Government Chapter 4 – Flashcards

Unlock all answers in this set

Haven't found what you were looking for?

Search for samples, answers to your questions and flashcards