"The Yellow Wallpaper" is a series of journal entries written by Charlotte Perkins Gilman in the first person. The narrator who is probably suffering from postpartum depression gives an account of her progressive insanity. Being misdiagnosed by her husband who is a physician of high standing, she is confined into an upstairs bedroom to take rest cure treatment which gives rise to her obsession with the wallpaper ending in lunacy rather than expected recuperation. The author employs symbolic objects and characters to illustrate the restrictive social bonds on women in the 19th century.
A close look at the wallpaper, the light, the house and the main characters helps unveil the recurring theme of the oppression of women and their continuing struggle to escape from the oppression. The wallpaper, as the cue of the whole story, embodies the most salient symbol as the domestic trap the soc
...iety sets to imprison women. The bizarre pattern, the color and the smell elicit the narrator's emotional turmoil. At the beginning, the wallpaper upsets and scares her. The "repellent", "revolting" and "smouldering unclean yellow" (p. 2) is often associated with illness, "inferiority" and "cowardice". This indicates the social assumption that women are frail and weak. The narrator applies "sulphur" (p. 32) which releases suffocating odor of rotten eggs to demonstrate the depressive atmosphere within the restrained space.
This chemical element also creates a connection with "tonics" (p. 30), the medicine she is taking. Moreover, the narrator thinks the "flamboyant patterns" "commit artistic sin" and "the lame uncertain curves commit suicide and destroy themselves in unheard of contradictions" (p. 2). Such thought implies her internalization of the social norms that fighting against male
authority is equivalent to committing a crime which will lead to suicide and self-destruction. This ironically coincides with her losing mind in the end, which enhances the oppression on women. Moreover, the wallpaper "is torn off in spots and it sticketh closer than a brother" with "perseverance as well as hatred" (p. 34). This alludes to the slight chance of escaping from the oppression consisted by men's reinforcement on their power and strong denial of gender equality.
Predictably, the deep cause for her fear is her brainwashed idea that women should maintain maternal roles and whoever tries to fight back will suffer grave consequences. Therefore, the vicious influence of the wallpaper which is generated from her latent inner desire frightens and disturbs her. Then the wallpaper develops its symbolic meaning into the narrator's growing but still repressed inner desire to liberate. With no simulation but only rest prescribed by her husband, she becomes curious of the wallpaper as revealed in the statement that "I'm getting fond of the room in spite of the wallpaper.
Perhaps because of the wallpaper" (p. 35). As a result, she tries to figure out the pattern, but it is "not arranged on any laws of radiation, or alternation, or repetition, or symmetry, or anything else" (p. 35). Such pointless pattern departs from any conventional design, which indicates that her inner desire is abnormal under that social setting. Gradually a creeping woman emerges which is an indication that she begins to accept her inner desire she has always been avoiding. Another evidence for her change is that she is used to the yellow smell released by the wallpaper.
Her accustomed attitude towards the stifling
smell shows that she does not resist her dangerous idea any more. At this moment, the wallpaper functions as a mirror. It reflects her inner self who values the "lack of sequence" and "defiance of law", namely her inner desire of gender equality while the outer one considers it "irritant to a normal mind" (p. 38). But the outer one overmasters the inner one because she is poisoned with the social prejudice on women just like the "fungus" on the "arabesque" which buds and sprouts in her mind.
The personification that the wallpaper "turns a back somersault", "slaps you in your face, knocks you down and tramples upon you" (p. 38) witnesses her ongoing violent struggle in her mind. Consequently, observing the wallpaper habitually shows that the narrator is on her way of realization as she neither denies nor accepts her inner desire. In the end, the wallpaper symbolizes the narrator's realization that the woman hidden underneath mirrors her own predicament.
As the narrator fully identifies herself with the trapped woman, she strips off the wallpaper to set the woman free and to rescue herself as well which is reflected in the statement that "I've got out at last" (p. 44). The process that "I pulled and she shook, I shook and she pulled" (p. 44) is a reflection of women with the same inner desire gather as a union and struggle hardly to break the social bonds. However, the ending is a paradox. On the surface, the narrator successfully astonishes her husband, but she is reduced to animalistic creep and even misnames "Jane" for "Jennie".
Thus, pulling off the wallpaper is a superficial victory compared to her
mental breakdown. The author deliberately leaves the suspense to readers to imagine what will happen to the narrator and probably she will be institutionalized into mental hospital. In fact, the careful chosen word "wallpaper" instead of "wall" in the title foreshadows the ending. According to the literal meaning, it is a compound of "wall" and "paper". "Paper" is vulnerable associated with one level of social restrictions on women, but "wall" is a solid barrier of long-term sexual discrimination.
The difference between "wallpaper" and "wall" determines the long way for women to strive for gender equality. As a result, the paradoxical ending enhances the oppressive social bonds on women. Furthermore, the sunlight and the moonlight shadowing on the wallpaper hold the symbolic meaning. Sunlight associated with brightness will expose the narrator's intention of liberation to the public, so by daylight the imaginary woman keeps still as if "she is subdued" (p. 38). In contrast, moonlight associated with secretive darkness covers her intention "in shady spots", so "she takes hold of the bars and shakes them hard" (p. 1) when the moonlight takes turns.
Besides, the moonlight through the barred windows makes shadow on the wallpaper so that "it becomes bars" (p. 38) and strangles the woman behind. This pushes the narrator to recognize the wallpaper as the social bonds that repress women. Her distinct reaction to sunlight and moonlight illustrates that the male aggressiveness is too strong and silences women's voices. In addition, the house her husband rents for her treatment is embedded with the symbolic meaning. The limited domestic environment determines women's mission as domestic wives or even servants.
The narrator depicts the house as "a colonial mansion"
and "a hereditary estate" (p. 30). This indicates that the ingrained gender-biased social attitude preserves as an inheritance which is passed along and colonizes women. She regards the house as "haunted" and "queer" since it "stood so long untenanted" (p. 30). Her delusion seems to be an evidence of her "slight hysterical tendency" (p. 30), but actually it demonstrates her suspicions about the unfair but ignored social norms on women just like the tenantless house. However, even the house is not her domain, the upstairs room is.
The locked room is a nursery and symbolizes the oppression enforced by her husband's paternalistic behavior which makes the narrator far from the outside world. What she can do is merely observing from the barred windows. Barring windows can be covered by the excuse of preventing unexpected accidents, but it is humiliating to an adult as treated in the same way as a child or a prisoner. She can see "the garden with mysterious deepshaded arbors, the riotous old fashioned flowers, and bushes and gnarly trees" (p. 33). The garden represents the society, but it is mysterious to the narrator because it is seldom landed by women.
Those riotous flowers symbolize the minority of women who successfully contribute their talent without any restrictions and have achieved full development. She also imagines "people walking in these numerous paths and arbors" towards "the bay" and "private wharf" (p. 33). Those walking people can be interpreted as males who own positions and freedom in their private society tightly closed to women. The view she sees shows her desire to expand her territory from domestic houses to the society, but she is treated as
giving way to fancy by her husband.
Besides that, the inconsistent description that the narrator dares not look out of the window is a foreshadowing of her semi-victory. She is too exhausted to think how much those creeping women have suffered which is a mirror to remind her of her own painful struggling process. Compared to creeping outside where "everything is green instead of yellow" (p. 44), she prefers creeping inside where she feels safe. This shows that she recognizes her aspirations of gender equality, but she loses the courage to cope with the outside world filled with competitive vigor and complexity as connoted with "green".
The mental struggle process consumes her entire reason which highlights the extreme oppressive force on women. Apart from the symbolic objects, the author employs symbolic characters to illustrate the theme of oppression on women. The narrator herself is a symbol of fighting against males because it is the narrator's feelings that color the surrounding objects which are originally neutral and make them oppressive (Sparknotes, n. d. , Analysis of Major Characters section). She is combined with outer passivity under male authority and inner rebellion against male dominance.
She "personally" disagrees with the treatment, "personally" believes writing is a "congenial work" (p. 30) and even belittles herself as "a comparative burden" instead of "a help to John" (p. 32). This shows that women are brainwashed to act as inferior to men and their opinions have little power to change anything. However, passively accepting the male authority is merely the superficial narrator because she keeps writing secretly to "relieve her mind" and wishes "less opposition and more society and stimulus" (p. 31).
Being restricted and
made fun of by her husband, she hides her true feelings and falls into her own territory of fascination. Her attitude towards the wallpaper intensifies into the possessive sense of tracing the pattern on her own. Gradually she separates herself from the reality as indicated in her inability to understand Jennie's explanation that the yellow stains on her clothes comes from the wallpaper. Although she finally makes the connection between the predicament of the trapped woman and her own dilemma, such dissociation from the reality leads to her insanity.
The irony that the narrator has to lose her mind to understand her inner self emphasizes the sacrifice she has made and criticizes the ridiculous idea that females are subordination. Therefore, the narrator symbolizes the possibility of the women's liberation from the restrictive social bonds after torturing struggle. Compared to the narrator's rebellious inner desire, Jennie represents a role model for what the society expect of women.
The account that "she is a perfect and enthusiastic housekeeper, and hopes for no better profession" (p. 4) reveals that she lives contentedly in the domestic circle. It is no wonder that she does not show any understanding or sympathy to the narrator and even thinks that it is the writing that makes the narrator sick. The contrast between the narrator and Jennie creates an ironic contradictory of whether to arouse inner desire and suffer painfully or to behave submissively and live normally. In conclusion, Gilman uses various symbols to show social oppression on women and their struggle to escape from the oppression.
The physical environment around the narrator including the wallpaper, the light and the house triggers her mental breakdown. Meanwhile,
her husband and sister-in-law aggravate her isolation from the reality. Her ending in tearing the wallpaper madly symbolizes her midway of liberation - in the gap between the idea and real action to gain gender equality. Such failure of self-rescue strengthens the oppression placed by the society. Gilman's use of symbolism strikes a chord and prompts a reflection in modern society where gender inequality still exists.
- Social Construction of Gender essays
- Boy essays
- Gay essays
- Gender essays
- Gender Identity essays
- Gender Roles In Society essays
- Gender Stereotypes essays
- Girl essays
- Homosexuality essays
- Human Sexual Behavior essays
- Lgbt essays
- Man essays
- Masculinity essays
- Sexual Orientation essays
- Transgender essays
- Woman essays
- Ageism essays
- Cultural Diversity essays
- Discrimination essays
- Diversity essays
- Gender Discrimination essays
- Multiculturalism essays
- Oppression essays
- Peer Pressure essays
- Racial Profiling essays
- Sexism essays
- 1984 essays
- A Farewell to Arms essays
- A Good Man Is Hard to Find essays
- A Hanging essays
- A Lesson Before Dying essays
- A Long Way Gone essays
- A Rose For Emily essays
- A Separate Peace essays
- A Tale Of Two Cities essays
- A Very Old Man With Enormous Wings essays
- Adventures Of Huckleberry Finn essays
- Alice in Wonderland essays
- All Quiet on The Western Front essays
- Allegory of the Cave essays
- An occurrence at owl creek bridge essays
- Animal Farm essays
- Anthem essays
- Antigone essays
- Arthur Conan Doyle essays
- As I Lay Dying essays
- Atticus Finch essays
- Barn Burning essays
- Battle Royal essays
- Beauty and The Beast essays