Ethical Dilemmas Analysis Essay Example

death. People must be saved from this. Human beings do not deserve to suffer long if in the end, still, they will die. Due to the fact that people performing active euthanasia are people knowledgeable of patients’ condition and such act is an act of love, therefore, the law should be changed to allow active euthanasia.

II. Is killing a patient by turning off respirator a case of killing or letting die? Turning off a respirator is not a case of killing but letting die. This claim comes from two reasons. First, technological advancements alter the natural flow of things. Second, turning off the respirator is just allowing the natural flow of things. Technological advancements alter the course of nature.

People now are deviating from the natural flow of death because of the advancement of technology. In most cases, advancement of technology does not really help patients. It only prolongs the patients’ agony. Without a respirator, patient will surely die. This case is true in the generations before us. There is a natural flow of things and a natural way to die. Like a human being that was made in a natural way, he must also die in a natural way. Machines such as respirators and the likes are only altering the flow of nature. These machines are the ones taking control of people’s lives and not nature.

This presupposes an artificial flow of things, making life a dictate of technology. Turning off the respirator is not killing but only an act of allowing nature to flow in its natural path. It is only an act of just letting people die. This act is not immoral. This is only

a humble admission that even with the presence of advance technology, people can’t really escape death. Man has no hold of the natural flow of things and cannot dictate the course of people’s lives. Medical machines most of the time only prolongs the agony of the patient.

Instead of letting the patient die, it only alters his death and by altering it, the act makes the patient suffer more. Therefore, turning off the respirator is not killing but an act of just letting the patient die. Technological advancement only alters the flow of nature. Turning off the respirator is only allowing the flow of nature to take its course. III. Is death always a just punishment for murder? Can you think of any exceptions? Death is always a just punishment for murder. There can be no other punishment equally fitted to murder. People have no right to kill people.

Death must only come from the natural flow of things. In cases of murder, death becomes man- made and it deviates from the natural flow of things. People tend to alter other people’s lives. Criminals play god as if they are the ones who gave the lives of human beings. Every action has a consequence. Consequences may not be good but it is still very important to society. Murder must be punished by death. If one man ended a person’s life, his life must end too. There must be no exceptions for this law because exceptions are just being used as excuses.

Criminals always use exemptions as excuses for them to be able to attain a lower punishment. Death is the only due punishment for murderers, nothing more, nothing

less. Death is always a just punishment for murder. I can’t think of any exceptions in cases of murder. Killers must die. They are just making society hard and unsafe to live. Death to murderers is the only way to bring peace to society. There must be a total eradication of murderers. People deserve a peaceful and safe society. They were made to enjoy life and not to fear anyone.

Death penalty will bring about good inter human relationship because criminals will then be watchful of their actions. Therefore, death is the only appropriate and just punishment for murder. This is due to the fact that every action must have an equal consequence. Death penalty also is not only a consequential view but also utilitarian in a sense that killing murderers gives birth to may safe lives in a society. Safe lives in a society would mean people enjoying the life that was endowed to him.

IV. What is the appropriate punishment for the crimes of rape and torture? Human beings must be treated humanely. This is a natural right that every human being has been endowed from the moment of birth. Human beings must preserve their dignity and other people must respect this dignity. In cases of rape and torture, human beings are being treated not on the way they must be treated. Human beings in this state are treated like animals or just mere things that have no life and dignity at all. This is a complete disrespect to the dignity of human beings. Death by lethal injection must be the punishment for rape and torture.

Most people get away from the appropriate punishment of committing rape

and torture. Most of the criminals only spend few years in jail. This light punishment is absurd. Criminals in committing crimes find pleasure in it. They find torture and rape so enjoyable. They deserve to die. We don’t need people like them in our society. Criminals are only a menace to our society. They do more harm than good. They are just making our society so chaotic that people do not anymore enjoy the atmosphere of safety. Opposite to torture and rape, death to lethal injection is not painful.

Even if criminals deserve to die, they must also have the luxury of dying silently and not painfully. What we are after of the death penalty is not really revenge. It is more of a campaign to eradicate criminals and make the society a better place to live. Wiping out criminals is a must that society must do. This is an urgent need that must be addressed. Without criminals, people will enjoy a peaceful environment and thus giving them opportunity to enjoy life in general. Therefore, death penalty through lethal injection is the appropriate punishment for rape and torture.