AP Gov. Unit 2 Writing Prompts – Flashcards
Unlock all answers in this set
Unlock answersquestion
Why should we keep the electoral college?
answer
- it's in the constitution and has worked well since the formation of the US -benefits smaller states by forcing candidates to campaign in these states - would need an amendment to remove which would be difficult to enact
question
Why should we change the electoral college?
answer
- winner-take-all is a disadvantage for third party candidates - not a true representation of how people feel (popular vote doesn't match the electoral vote) - candidates put most time into early voting and swing states
question
How does the electoral college/winner-take-all affect campaigns?
answer
Candidates spend lots of their time campaigning in swing states so that they can get their votes
question
Why is the electoral college important?
answer
It introduces a bias into the campaign and electoral process and the winner-take-all rule means that candidates will focus on winning the states where the polls show that there is a close contest
question
How does the electoral college hinder third parties?
answer
the electoral college does not provide an accurate representation of the popular vote due to the winner-take-all rule. No matter how many votes a third party gets, they will never receive any real votes unless they win a clear majority which is unlikely
question
Federal Election Campaign Act
answer
a law passed in 1974 for reforming campaign finances. The act created the Federal Election Commission, provided public financing for presidential primaries and general elections, limited presidential campaign spending, required disclosure, and attempted to limit contributions
question
Federal Election Commission
answer
a sex-member bipartisan agency created by the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1974 which enforces campaign finance laws
question
1979 Amendment to the Federal Election Campaign Act
answer
made it easier for political parties to raise money for voter registration drives and the distribution of campaign material at the grass-roots level or for generic party advertising
question
Soft money
answer
political contributions earmarked for party-building expenses at the grass-roots level or for generic party advertising
question
The McCain-Feingold Act
answer
-banned soft money contributions -increased the amount that individuals could give to candidates from $1,000 to $2,000 and indexed the latter amount to rise in the future along with inflation - barred groups from running "issue ads" within 60 days of a general election if if they refer to a federal candidate and are not funded through a PAC
question
527 Groups
answer
Independent groups that seek to influence the political process but are not subject to contribution restrictions because they do not directly seek the election of particular candidates
question
PACs
answer
Political Action Committees funding vehicles created by the 1974 campaign finance reforms. A corporation, union, or some other interest group can create a political action committee and register with the Federal Election Commission which will meticulously monitor the PACs expenditures
question
Why do candidates need PACs?
answer
Because political campaigns are expensive
question
Why do people worry about PACs?
answer
they worry that all the money raised by PACs will lead to them controlling what winners do once in office
question
How much did Obama and McCain spend in the 2008 election?
answer
spent 1 billion
question
How much did Obama and Mitt spend in the 2012 election?
answer
spent 3 billion