The first scene of The Tempest deviates from the usual openings of Shakespeare's plays, as it is primarily action-oriented. Instead of introducing main characters or setting up important plot strands, this scene serves as a device to grab the audience's attention. In fact, all the events of Act 1 Scene 1 are later recounted in the conversations between Miranda, Prospero, and Ariel in the following scene. It is reasonable to assert that Shakespeare may have considered removing the first scene altogether and relying on the audience's attention to the second scene if these events occurred later in the play. However, as an opening scene, Scene 2 alone would have been dull and uninspiring, consisting mostly of lengthy explanatory dialogue from Prospero. In the 17th Century when the play was written, audiences were not reserved and polite as the
...y are today, and they may not have reacted well to being bored. Scene 1 resolves this issue by abandoning explanations of unfolding events and characterizations, instead focusing on creating an exciting and tense opening scene that immediately captures the audience's attention.During the time when The Tempest was written, theatres were very basic in nature. They lacked the capabilities to achieve the special effects and elaborate sets that we witness in modern theatres. As a result, Shakespeare had to rely on more subtle yet equally effective techniques to convey the desired atmosphere. One notable aspect of the first scene is the brevity of the characters' lines. With the exception of one moderately sized speech, lines 20-25, the rest are all only four to six lines in length. This rapid dialogue indicates that the characters are in a panicke
state and do not have time for lengthy conversations. The script itself contains numerous exclamation marks, reflecting the characters' need to shout in order to be heard above the noise of the storm. In contemporary theatre, a storm scene would likely utilize recordings of thunder, crashing waves, and the sound of a ship breaking apart. However, in Shakespeare's time, theatres did not possess such advanced technology. They had to rely on creating physical noise to simulate thunder. Similarly, while modern theatre often employs sophisticated strobe lighting effects, Shakespeare would have faced more limitations. He might have resorted to using explosives or brightly burning chemicals to achieve his desired visual impact.It is important to keep in mind that in the past, people attached greater significance to thunder and lightning than we do today. While we view it merely as bad weather, they may have seen it through a religious or spiritual lens. Interestingly, it was these types of crude special effects that ultimately caused the Globe Theatre to be burned down. In addition to the rapid and anxious dialogue, the characters frequently enter and exit the stage, indicating their busyness to the audience. These simplistic methods effectively convey tension and excitement. The tension quickly escalates in the scene as nerves fray and the characters grow more panicked. The conversation between the Boatswain and passengers Antonio and Alonso becomes increasingly heated, eventually leading to insults, despite the need for unity in such circumstances. One particularly effective technique used here is the cry within, where someone shouts something off-stage. For instance, lines 58-61 include the following: "A confused noise within: 'Mercy on us!' 'We split, we split!' 'Farewell,
my wife and children!' 'Farewell, brother!' 'We split, we split, we split!'" As Shakespeare's theatre lacked an effective means of portraying the ship's destruction on stage, he employs this indirect method, allowing the audience to imagine the ship's demise entirely on their own.
This scene is more effective than anything that could have been physically performed on stage, even for modern theatres. The only way to depict it directly would be in a film, which was not even imagined in the 17th Century. If portrayed effectively, this scene would undoubtedly captivate the audience's attention. However, their minds may still wander during the dialogue-driven next scene. To prevent this, Shakespeare relies on a cliffhanger - a technique commonly used in various storytelling media. A cliffhanger leaves the audience uncertain about the ending and encourages them to return for the next part to discover what happens next. Act 1 Scene 1 of The Tempest ends with the audience unsure if anyone on the boat survived. Later in the following scene, the fate of the crew and passengers is revealed, capturing the audience's attention. Using these techniques, Shakespeare succeeds in engaging the audience and evoking their curiosity about the plot."
- Aldous Huxley essays
- Alice Walker essays
- Amy tan essays
- Anne Bradstreet essays
- Anton Chekhov essays
- Arthur Miller essays
- Augustine essays
- Bertolt Brecht essays
- Booker T Washington essays
- Carol ann duffy essays
- Charles Dickens essays
- Charlotte Perkins Gilman essays
- Chinua Achebe essays
- Christina Rossetti essays
- Consider The Lobster essays
- Edgar Allan Poe essays
- Elizabeth Bishop essays
- Emily Dickinson essays
- Ernest Hemingway essays
- F. Scott Fitzgerald essays
- George Orwell essays
- Harper Lee essays
- Homer essays
- James Baldwin essays
- Jane Austen essays
- John Donne essays
- John Steinbeck essays
- Kate Chopin essays
- Kurt Vonnegut essays
- Langston Hughes essays
- Leonardo Da Vinci essays
- Mark Twain essays
- Mary Shelley essays
- Maya Angelou essays
- Nathaniel Hawthorne essays
- Oscar Wilde essays
- Percy Bysshe Shelley essays
- Peter Skrzynecki essays
- Phillis Wheatley essays
- Poets essays
- Ralph Waldo Emerson essays
- Ray Bradbury essays
- Richard Rodriguez essays
- Robert Browning essays
- Robert Frost essays
- Robert Louis Stevenson essays
- Seamus Heaney essays
- Sherman Alexie essays
- Sophocles essays
- Stephen King essays