question

Marbury v. Madison (1803, Marshall)

answer

The court established its role as the arbiter of the constitutionality of federal laws, the principle is known as judicial review

question

Fletcher v. Peck (1810, Marshall)

answer

The decision stems from the Yazoo land cases, 1803, and upholds the sanctity of contracts.

question

McCulloch v. Maryland (1819, Marshall)

answer

The Court ruled that states cannot tax the federal government, i.e. the Bank of the United States; the phrase "the power to tax is the power to destroy"; confirmed the constitutionality of the Bank of the United States.

question

Dartmouth College v. Woodward (1819, Marshall)

answer

New Hampshire had attempted to take over Dartmouth College by revising its colonial charter. The Court ruled that the charter was protected under the contract clause of the U. S. Constitution; upholds the sanctity of contracts.

question

Gibbons v. Ogden (1824, Marshall)

answer

Clarified the commerce clause and affirmed Congressional power over interstate commerce.

question

Johnson v. McIntosh (1823, Marshall)

answer

Established that Indian tribes had rights to tribal lands that preceded all other American law; only the federal government could take land from the tribes.

question

Cherokee Nation v. Georgia (1831, Marshall)

answer

"The conditions of the Indians in relation to the United States is perhaps unlike that of any two people in existence," Chief Justice John Marshall wrote, "their relation to the United States resembles that of a ward to his guardian. . .(they were a) domestic dependent nation." Established a "trust relationship" with the tribes directly under federal authority.

question

Worcester v. Georgia (1832, Marshall)

answer

Established tribal autonomy within their boundaries, i.e. the tribes were "distinct political communities, having territorial boundaries within which their authority is exclusive."

question

Charles River Bridge v. Warren Bridge (1837, Taney)

answer

The interests of the community are more important than the interests of business; the supremacy of society's interest over private interest.

question

Commonwealth v. Hunt (1842)

answer

Declared that labor unions were lawful organizations and that the strike was a lawful weapon.

question

Scott v. Sanford (1857, Taney)

answer

Speaking for a widely divided court, Chief Justice Taney ruled that Dred Scott was not a citizen and had no standing in court; Scott's residence in a free state and territory had not made him free since he returned to Missouri; Congress had no power to prohibit slavery in a territory (based on the 5th Amendment right of a person to be secure from seizure of property), thus voiding the Missouri Compromise of 1820.

question

Ex parte Milligan (1866)

answer

Ruled that a civilian cannot be tried in military courts while civil courts are available.

question

Civil Rights Cases of 1883. (A single decision on a group of cases with similar legal problems)

answer

Legalized segregation with regard to private property.

question

Wabash, St. Louis, and Pacific Railway Co. v. Illinois (1886)

answer

Declared state-passed Granger laws that regulated interstate commerce unconstitutional.

question

Chicago, Milwaukee and St. Paul Railroad Co. v. Minnesota (1890)

answer

Found that Granger law regulations were violations of the 5th Amendment right to property.

question

Pollock v. The Farmers' Loan and Trust Co. (1895)

answer

Declared the income tax under the Wilson-Gorman Tariff to be unconstitutional.

question

U. S. v. E. C. Knight Co. (1895)

answer

Due to a narrow interpretation of the Sherman Anti-Trust Act, the Court undermined the authority of the federal government to act against monopolies.

question

Plessy v. Ferguson (1896)

answer

Legalized segregation in publicly owned facilities on the basis of "separate but equal."

question

"Insular Cases" / Downes v. Bidwell (1901)

answer

Confirmed the right of the federal government to place tariffs on good entering the U. S. From U. S. Territories on the grounds that "the Constitution does not follow the flag."

question

Northern Securities Co. v. U. S. (1904)

answer

Re-established the authority of the federal government to fight monopolies under the Sherman Anti-Trust Act.

question

Lochner v. New York (1905)

answer

Declared unconstitutional a New York act limiting the working hours of bakers due to a denial of the 14th Amendment rights.

question

Muller v. Oregon (1908)

answer

First case to use the "Brandeis brief"; recognized a 10-hour work day for women laundry workers on the grounds of health and community concerns.

question

Hammer v. Dagenhart (1918)

answer

Declared the Keating-Owen Act (a child labor act) unconstitutional on the grounds that it was an invasion of state authority.

question

Schenck v. U. S. (1919)

answer

Unanimously upheld the Espionage Act of 1917 which declared that people who interfered with the war effort were subject to imprisonment; declared that the 1st Amendment right to freedom of speech was not absolute; free speech could be limited if its exercise presented a "clear and present danger."

question

Adkins v. Children's Hospital (1923)

answer

Declared unconstitutional a minimum wage law for women on the grounds that it denied women freedom of contract.

question

Schechter v. U. S. (1936)

answer

Sometimes called "the sick chicken case." Unanimously declared the National Industrial Recovery Act (NIRA) unconstitutional on three grounds: that the act delegated legislative power to the executive; that there was a lack of constitutional authority for such legislation; and that it sought to regulate businesses that were wholly intrastate in character.

question

Korematsu v. U. S. (1941)

answer

The court upheld the constitutionality of detention camps for Japanese-Americans during World War 2.

question

Ex parte Endo (1944)

answer

The court forbade the internment of Japanese-Americans born in the U. S. (Nisei)

question

Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas (1954, Warren)

answer

Unanimous decision declaring "separate but equal" unconstitutional.

question

Gideon v. Wainwright (1963)

answer

Extends to the defendant the right of counsel in all state and federal criminal trials regardless of their ability to pay.

question

Escobedo v. Illinois (1964)

answer

Ruled that a defendant must be allowed access to a lawyer before questioning by police.

question

Miranda v. Arizona (1966)

answer

The court ruled that those subjected to in-custody interrogation be advised of their constitutional right to an attorney and their right to remain silent.

question

Roe v. Wade (1973)

answer

The court legalized abortion by ruling that state laws could not restrict it during the first three months of pregnancy. Based on 4th Amendment rights of a person to be secure in their persons.

question

U. S. v. Richard Nixon (1974)

answer

The court rejected Richard Nixon's claim to an absolutely unqualified privilege against any judicial process.

question

Bakke v. Regents of the University of California (1978)

answer

Ambiguous ruling by a badly divided court that dealt with affirmative action programs that used race as a basis of selecting participants. The court general upheld affirmative action, but with a 4/4/1 split, it was a very weak decision.

question

Clinton v. Jones (1997)

answer

Rejecting an appeal by Pres. Clinton in a sexual harassment suit, the Court ruled that a sitting president did not have temporary immunity from a lawsuit for actions outside the realm of official duties.

question

Boy Scouts of America v. Dale (2000)

answer

The Court ruled that the Boy Scouts of America could dismiss a troop leader after learning he was gay, holding that the right to freedom of association outweighed a New Jersey anti - discrimination statute.

question

Bush v. Gore (2000)

answer

The court ruled that manual recounts of presidential ballots in the Nov. 2000 election could not proceed because inconsistent evaluation standards in different counties violated the equal protection clause. In effect, the ruling meant Bush would win the election.

AP US History Court Cases – Flashcards

Unlock all answers in this set

Haven't found what you were looking for?

Search for samples, answers to your questions and flashcards