Please enter something
View of White Women in Interracial Relationships
View of White Women in Interracial Relationships

View of White Women in Interracial Relationships

Available Only on StudyHippo
  • Pages: 8 (3771 words)
  • Published: July 31, 2017
  • Type: Case Study
Text preview

A Qualitative Analysis of Black Women 's Constructions of White Women in Interracial Relationships. Research, particularly media discourses suggest and show that black adult females have a negative discourse towards white adult females who have interracial relationships. Therefore this exploratory qualitative survey used focal point groups to look into how black adult females construct interracial relationships and white adult females who have interracial relationships. Social constructionist guided the discourse theory methodological analysis. Participants described...

Since the 1980s societal constructionism has become an progressively influential position within psychological science ( e.g. , Burr, 1995 ) . Social constructionism suggests that human experience, including perceptual experience is mediated historically, culturally and linguistically ( Willig, 2007 ) . Therefore for this survey, it is of import to understand gender and race historically, besides black and white brotherhoods within a historical context.

Interracial dealingss in a historical context, the building of race and multiculturalism

Historically, interracial brotherhoods have played an built-in function in the building of racial classs. Interracial sex and matrimony became aberrant within the building of a white individuality that was in resistance to inkinesss. The implicit in footing for interracial gender as pervert being the claim that inkinesss and Whites are biologically and culturally different. An of import portion of this construct of race is based on black people 's experiences, buildings and discourses approximately Whites as menaces to racial pureness ( Childs, 2005 ) .

The issue of interracial sex and matrimony is an built-in portion of the building of race


and racial groups, with the resistance to and the fright of interracial relationships frequently used as a agency to put to death and warrant racialist political orientations and patterns. Therefore, Ideas of race as biological difference emerged with bondage, as a justification. So both the building of white/black relationships as debatable, and the maltreatment seen during bondage, can be seen as emerging along with altering discourses of race.

During black bondage, among white peoples interracial sexual relationships was constructed as pervert, and this thought of deviancy was chiefly aimed at forestalling black male slaves from prosecuting in sexual Acts of the Apostless with white adult females. It has been documented that those who did prosecute in interracial sexual relationships would be punished. However, for black people there is a complicated and painful history to black and white interracial relationships, as a consequence the roots of the ill will are different from white people. The discourses on interracial relationships are complex.

The ill will that black communities may hold to guard interracial relationships derives from a societal and corporate 'memory ' of misdemeanor by Whites. Historically inkinesss as a group have had to cover with the devaluation by Whites and this in bend has effectual black 's individuality which has as a consequence shaped the attitudes and responses to interracial relationships. It has been good documented that black adult females were allegedly despoiled and sexually abused by white slave Masterss who all play a immense portion in the sociohistorical building of race and the regulations of race dealingss ( Childs, 2005 ) .

Social constructionist propose that the construct of race, for illustration the belief that th

View entire sample
Join StudyHippo to see entire essay
View entire sample
Join StudyHippo to see entire essay

categorization based on skin coloring material and other skin deep belongingss like organic structure form or hair manner maps onto meaningful, of import biological sorts which is a pseudo biological construct that has been used to warrant and rationalize the unequal intervention of groups of people or others ( Machery & A ; Faucher 2005 ) .

Social constructionism became prevailing chiefly in the 1970s. It became recognised that the biological construct of races, that is, of population of conspecifics that are genetically and morphologically different from each other, could non be applied to human. Delegating an person to a race does non purchase the illative power you are normally warranted to anticipate from a biological sort term. Besides, categorizations based on different traits such as skin coloring material, organic structure form hair etc normally cross cut each other ( Brown & A ; Armelagos 2001 ) . Therefore, the racist dogma that skin coloring material and other skin deep belongingss pick up different biological groups has been assumed to be false.

Therefore, biological science has fuelled the recent racial agnosticism of societal constructionists, that is, the position that races do non be. But societal constructionists about race are non mere skeptics. They normally underscore the instability and diverseness of human existences ' construct of races. For case Omi and Winant ( 2002 ) province that attempt must be made to understand race as an unstable and 'decentered ' complex of societal significances invariably being transformed by political battle.

Banton ( 1970 ) suggest that this impression is a modern intercession, rooted in the 18th century taxonomies of Linnaeus and Blumenbach, for them, there were times or topographic points where people did non hold any construct of race ( Machery & A ; Faucher 2005 ) . The constructionist part to the apprehension of racism is of import. It suggests that person 's construct of race do non happen in a societal vacuity: societal environment are of import to explicate the construct of our construct of race. This helps to place the diverseness of person 's construct of race across civilizations.

There has been turning literature in evolutionary psychological science and evolutionary anthropology about racism. Although no consensus has yet emerged, several proposals have late attempted to depict the implicit in cognitive mechanism responsible for the production of racial constructs ( e.g. , Hirschfield, 2001 ; White, 2001 ; Machery & A ; Faucher 2005 ) . The two latter attacks are both a needed addendum to the societal constructionist attack. The return of racial categorization across civilizations and the commonalities between them suggest that racial categorizations are the merchandise of some cosmopolitan psychological temperament.

There is much literature that addresses the issue of interracial relationships and matrimonies specifically, for illustration both quantitative and qualitative methods have been implemented. Interracial heterosexual relationships have been explored from many point of views. Qualitative research has been conducted on black work forces and white adult females interracial twosomes ( McNamara, Tempenis, & A ; Walton 1999 ; Rosenblatt, Karis, & A ; Powell 1995 ; Spickard 1989 ) and quantitative informations of black and white attitudes towards interracial

View entire sample
Join StudyHippo to see entire essay