The Good and Evil Desire of Macbeth Essay Essay
Desire in itself is a powerful force. In fact. about every action we take. good or evil. is prompted by desire. Success and promotion is besides something we all seem to desire. It is something people spend hours. yearss. and old ages of their life either fixing for. or trailing after. It is a desire that we are frequently endeavoring for. and the things acquired or accomplished along the manner are how we define our lives. Ultimately. at one’s funeral people will retrieve a individual by how their lives summed up in the good or the bad that has been contributed. and the actions took in making so.
In William Shakespeare’s drama. The Calamity of Macbeth. depicts the narrative of an individual’s desire for success and promotion. In this instance. a epic man’s desire becomes something immoralities that causes tragic events. including homicidal Acts of the Apostless committed by Macbeth in a bloody rise to power and finally leads to his complete and arrant devastation. In sing any moral inquiry one must utilize rational thought to come to a logical decision of what is right poetry incorrect. or good poetry immorality.
In Macbeth’s instance. his deficiency of utilizing reason. common sense and logic caused a usually healthy emotion of desire for success and promotion into a self destructive 1 because. it continually led him to do awful determination. American author and philosopher Aryn Rand asserts. “Man must obtain his cognition and take his actions by a procedure of thinking” otherwise. “Man has the power to move as his ain destroyer” ( 534 ) . Taking into consideration Rand’s moral doctrine of ethical egoism. a individual ought to make what is in his or her ain best involvement further proves that Macbeth desire became evil or was incorrect because it led to his decease.
While Rand’s quotation mark in itself is rational and rather fitting sing Macbeth’s died due to his actions. on the other manus. moral inquiries can non be decided entirely by appealing to moral authorization. For illustration. take into consideration. German philosopher Frederick Nietzsche. Harmonizing to Oscar Levy. desire for success and promotion can associate to how “Nietzsche believes that the cardinal originative force that motivates all creative activity is the will to power. We all seek to confirm ourselves. to boom and rule. ” ( 122 ) .
Many people in today’s society can besides hold with that belief and how it relates to the narrative of Macbeth. A individual in today’s society could mensurate their success and achievements in a occupation rubric. valuable parts on undertakings and the feelings of joy from acknowledgment or regard from equals therefore taking to a publicity to a higher place. pecuniary rises. and authorization over others. In The Tragedy of Macbeth. Macbeth is Thane of Glamis. This societal rubric indicates him as a baron. This is a place in the upper category of nobility that includes having a palace and lands.
In add-on. his valuable and epic part as a valorous soldier in a recent conflict has given him esteem and acknowledgment among his equals. This furthers his promotion and success by King Duncan. therefore allowing him an extra rubric. Thane of Cawdor. However. the job with Nietzsche’s belief. no affair how adjustment. is that it is an unsound statement because it is a headlong generalisation. Not “all creation” seeks to “affirm ourselves. to boom and dominate” ( 122 ) . For illustration. take a individual in today’s society who is offered a publicity.
This publicity comes with a more duties such as. pull offing a section of people. It is rather possible that this individual is presently happy with their place and does non wish to hold the excess duties of exerting control over other staff members. Therefore. in Nietzsche footings they do non desire to “dominate” other people. It is an unlogical statement to include all creative activity in the premiss. Another job in appealing to Nietzsche’s moral authorization is that a individual could simple disagree with his logical thinking of good and bad.
Harmonizing to Nietzsche in Goodness and the Will To Power. Good is “all that heightens the feeling of power. the Will To Power. and the power itself in a adult male. ” bad is “ all that returns as failing. ” and felicity is “the feeling that power is turning. that opposition is overcome” ( 134 ) . In Macbeth’s instance. his desire for the Crown and to stay in power led to him perpetrating regicide. killing the groomsman. engaging liquidators to kill his friend Banquo. and telling the decease of Macduff’s married woman and kids.
While Nietzsche would hold that all of those actions are good. society would non look excessively kindly upon the act of slaying inexperienced persons. Even if a individual has the certificates to be an authorization of a topic. there should be ways of proving the truth or rationality of moral judgements. As a affair of fact. Macbeth would neglect any trial of felicity because he systematically had what Nietzsche considered as bad or weak reactions. For illustration. alternatively of being happy that his power was turning after killing King Duncan. Macbeth stated he was. “afraid to believe what I have done” ( 2. 2. 64 ) .
His bloody rise to power to derive and procure the Crown may of bring forth a brief spark of pleasance but resulted in the tremendous monetary value of his witting destructing him. This included insanity in where his guilt and paranoia led to hallucinations in such as terrible nature that he couldn’t distinguish world from phantasy. As I antecedently stated. people will retrieve a individual at their funeral by how their lives summed up in the good or the bad that they contributed. and the actions took in making so.
Ultimately. Macbeth will be remembered as a adult male who committed regicide and a liquidator of a adult female. kids. and his kinsmen. His deficiency of utilizing reason. common sense and logic led him to do awful determination and began a barbarous circle doing a concatenation reaction of awful Acts of the Apostless and effects ensuing in the self-destruction of his married woman and finally his ain decease. Overall. Macbeth’s desire for success and promotion became genuinely evil that had terrible effects on non merely himself and his married woman but of inexperienced persons.
Nietzsche. Friedrich. “Beyond Good and Evil. ” The Moral Life: An Introductory Reader in Ethical motives and Literature. Ed. Louis Pojman and Lewis Vaughn. 4th. New York: Oxford UP. 2011. 121-134. Print. Rand. Ayn. “In Defense of Ethical Egoism. ” The Moral Life: An Introductory Reader in Ethical motives and Literature. Ed. Louis Pojman and Lewis Vaughn. 4th. New York: Oxford UP. 2011. 531-541. Print. Shakespeare. William. “The calamity of Macbeth. ” Ed. Paul Werstine and Barbara A. Mowat. New York: Simon & A ; Schuster Paperbacks. 1992. Print.