stated that the government was justified in silencing free speech when there is a clear and present danger to the nation

Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. More test answers on https://studyhippo.com/american-history-chapter-11-section-1-2/

4. (p. 113) Justice Holmes’s “clear and present danger” test holds that government can A. restrict speech that threatens national security. B. restrict any speech of an inflammatory nature. C. imprison political dissidents during time of war without following normal procedures. D. engage in prior restraint of the press whenever national security is at issue. E. restrict speech that is disrespectful to specific classes of citizens.

A. restrict speech that threatens national security. More test answers on https://studyhippo.com/chapter-4-government-and-politics/

Justice Holmes’s “clear and present danger” test holds that government can

restrict speech that threatens national security. More test answers on https://studyhippo.com/american-government-ch-4/

developed the “clear and present danger” rule

In deciding cases involving laws against sedition, the Supreme Court has More test answers on https://studyhippo.com/government-ch-19/

Clear and present danger rule

Doctrine applied if there is a conflict between free expression and public safety More test answers on https://studyhippo.com/chapter-13-vocabulary-3/

Martha owens and her band are fined for playing their music so loud that it disturbed their next door neighbors. What limitation applies? A commercial speech B incitement test C time place and manner D clear and present danger

C More test answers on https://studyhippo.com/street-law-last-unit/

d. presented “a clear and present danger” to the nation

4. During World War I, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that it was lawful to restrict speech that a. was slanderous or false. b. criticized the federal government. c. abridged the right to a fair and speedy trial. d. presented “a clear and present danger” to the nation. More test answers on https://studyhippo.com/mcc-chapter-3/

An emergency code was called after a patient pulled a knife from a pocket and threatened, “I will kill anyone who tries to get near me.” The patient was safely disarmed and placed in seclusion. Justification for use of seclusion was that the patient: d. presented a clear and present danger to others.

ANS: D The patient’s threat to kill self or others with the knife he possessed constituted a clear and present danger to self and others. The distracters are not sufficient reasons for seclusion. More test answers on https://studyhippo.com/chapter-27-anger-aggression-and-violence/

Home Page Law Constitutional Law Clear And Present Danger Page 2

Clear And Present Danger Flashcards, test questions and answers

Q: “clear and present danger” test

used to determine whether speech is protected or unprotected, based on its capacity to present a “clear and present danger” to society (page 124) More test answers on https://studyhippo.com/govt-2305-chapter-4/

Discover flashcards, test exam answers, and assignments to help you learn more about Clear And Present Danger and other subjects. Don’t miss the chance to use them for more effective college education. Use our database of questions and answers on Clear And Present Danger and get quick solutions for your test.

What is Clear And Present Danger?

Clear and Present Danger is a 1994 American action-thriller film based on the novel of the same name by Tom Clancy. It stars Harrison Ford as Jack Ryan, a CIA analyst who uncovers a drug cartel’s connection to a covert paramilitary operation in Colombia. The film was directed by Phillip Noyce and also stars Willem Dafoe, Anne Archer, Harris Yulin, Joaquim de Almeida, Miguel Sandoval, Thora Birch and Raymond Cruz.The story follows Ryan as he discovers that his former mentor has become involved with Colombian drug lords in an attempt to overthrow their government. He is forced into a mission to save his friend and stop the operation before it is too late. Along the way he not only faces danger from enemies but must also grapple with his own moral convictions regarding his role in such an undertaking. The themes of Clear and Present Danger are complex yet relevant to this day particularly when considering how governments are often faced with difficult decisions in their fight against crime and terrorism abroad while balancing their need for security with protecting civil liberties at home. In the film’s climax, Ryan makes the ultimate sacrifice in order to prevent more innocent lives from being taken; choosing justice over revenge for those responsible for all that has happened up until that point. Ultimately Clear and Present Danger serves as both an exciting thriller as well as thought-provoking examination of difficult governmental dilemmas making it a classic action movie worth revisiting time after time.

We've found 31 Clear And Present Danger tests

Clear And Present Danger Corrections Costs And Benefits Criminology Cruel And Unusual Punishment

Mid Term Corrections – Flashcards 139 terms

Matthew Carle

139 terms

Preview

Clear And Present Danger Due Process Clause

special supreme court cases for a college government class 20 terms

Steven Ramirez

20 terms

Preview

AP Government Civil Rights Act Of 1964 Clear And Present Danger District Court Judges Full Faith And Credit Necessary And Proper Clause Politics of the United States Rational Basis Test

Ap us history college board Hughesville 19 terms