Teacher Dismissal – Flashcards
Unlock all answers in this set
Unlock answersquestion
A teacher is entitled to procedural due process if termination of employment impairs a property or liberty interest.
answer
Procedural Due Process
question
a legitimate claim of entitlement to continued employment that is created by state law (granting tenure, conveys such a right)
answer
Property interest
question
when termination created a stigma or damage to an individual's reputation in a manner that forecloses future employment opportunities. Wrongfully fired for being a child molester.
answer
Liberty interest
question
The "due process" must be substantial enough to substantiate the cause. Fair and reasonable in application and protect from unreasonable, capricious, arbitrary actions of the government (schools included)
answer
Substantive Due Process
question
cause of any tenured teacher, probationary teacher within the contract period.
answer
Dismissal - Termination
question
ensure not only that a teacher is informed of the specific reasons and grounds for dismissal but also the school board bases its decision on evidence substantiating those grounds
answer
Dismissal - Procedural safeguards
question
Procedural protections are not accorded the probationary teacher when the employment contract is not renewed. -Most common requirement is notification of nonrenewal -- Teacher is simply provided the reasons
answer
Nonrenewal
question
Board of Regents v. Roth (1972) Perry v. Sinderman (1972) Addressed whether the infringement of a liberty or property interest entitles a probationary teacher to due process rights similar to tenured teachers
answer
Establishing property and liberty interests
question
1 year teacher Teacher must show that the employer's action 1) Resulted in damage of his or her rep or standing in community 2) Imposed a stigma that foreclosed other employment opportunities Determined Roth was not deprived of liberty -Rejected claim that he had protected property interest Court held that in order to establish a valid property right, and individual must have more than a "abstract need or desire" for a position. There must be a legitimate claim of entitlement
answer
Boards of Regents v. Roth
question
Nontenured 4th year of teaching Notified without reason or hearing Procedural due process should be afforded Supreme Court said that a non-tenured teacher does not have a constitutionally protected property right to employment requiring procedural due process before denial of reappointment BUT certain actions of the school board may create conditions entitling a non-tenured teacher to notice and a hearing similar to a tenured teacher.
answer
Perry v. Sinderman
question
Nonrenewal decisions damaging an individual's reputation and integrity. Nonrenewal decisions foreclosing other employment opportunities. Policies and practices creating a valid claim of rem-employment and nonrenewal decisions violating fundamental constitutional guarantees.
answer
Actions include
question
Non tenured employee does not have a property claim to reappointment unless government action has established a right
answer
Property interest
question
Fundamental constitutional guarantee such as freedom of expression and privacy right
answer
Liberty interest
question
If government action in the nonrenewal of employment threatens the exercise of these liberties, procedural due process must be afforded. A liberty interest may be implicated if the nonrenewal of employment damages individual reputation (charges must be serious against character - immorality, dishonesty)
answer
Establishing property and liberty interests
question
Judiciary looks for certain basic elements of teacher facing a severe lass; must be afforded procedural due process
answer
Procedural Requirements in Discharge proceedings
question
1) Notification of charges 2) Opportunity of a hearing 3) Adequate time to prepare a rebuttal 4) Access to evidence and names of witnesses 5) Hearing before an impartial tribunal 6) Representation by legal counsel 7) Opportunity to present evidence and witnesses 8) Opportunity to cross-examine adverse witnesses 9) Decision based on evidence and findings of the hearing 10) Transcript or recording of hearing 11) Opportunity to appeal an adverse decision Doesn't have to be in this order
answer
Steps for full procedural due process
question
as an impartial tribunal
answer
School boards acts
question
informs teacher of specific charges and allows the teacher time to prepare a response Clark Co. School District v. Riley (2000)
answer
Procedural Requirements timely
question
Hearing (before termination): -- A teacher facing a severe loss such as termination must be afforded full procedural due process Adequate notice of hearing Reasonable time Can waive hearing (if so, probably guilty and damned if it goes public) Impartial
answer
Procedural Requirements
question
Hortonville Joint School District v. Hortonville Ed. Assoc.: U.S. Supreme Court established school board is a proper review body to conduct dismissal hearings
answer
Impartial Hearing
question
Burden of proof is placed on school board to show cause for dismissal -Preponderance of evidence -- If school fails to meet this burden of proof, judiciary will not uphold the termination decision
answer
Procedural Requirements Evidence
question
last step before court
answer
Arbitration
question
Identified by statutes: incompetency, immorality, insubordination, unprofessional conduct, neglect of duty, other good cause, reduction in force, physical or mental incapacity, conviction of a felony or of a crime involving moral turpitude, inadequate performance, evident unfitness for service, failure to comply with such reasonable requirements as a board may prescribe; failure to show normal improvement and evidence of professional training and growth
answer
Dismissal for cause
question
lack of ability, quality of fitness, based on a number of factors
answer
Incompetency
question
generally not defined. Unacceptable conduct that affects teacher's fitness.
answer
Immorality
question
willful disregard or refusal to obey school regulation - Teachers cannot ignore reasonable directive/policies of administrators/boards
answer
Insubordination
question
vague and overbroad?
answer
Other good cause
question
employee that challenges a RIF disclosure shoulders the burden of proof. Courts have not defined due process for RIF
answer
Reduction in force
question
Grounds for suspension, demotion, dismissal and refusal to reemploy teachers and administrators; consideration of evaluations and standards of performance
answer
NRS 391.312
question
advocating the overthrow of the federal or state gov'ts through any means, any cause which constitutes grounds for the revocation of a teacher's license; willful neglect or failure to observe and carry out the requirements of this title; dishonesty; breaches in the security or confidentiality of the questions and answers of the achievement and proficiency examinations that are administered pursuant to NRS 389.015; intentional failure to observe and carry out the requirements of a plan to ensure the security of examinations adopted pursuant to NRS 389.616 or 389.620; an intentional violation of NRS 388.5265 or 388.527. Gross midconduct or an intentional failure to reporrt a violation of NRS 388.135 if the teacher or administrator witnessed the violation.
answer
Dismissal for Cause con't
question
wrongfully terminated employees may be entitled to compensatory and punitive damages -reinstated with back pay and attorney fees Can be held personally liable; can't be held liable for subordinates; Qualified immunity in good faith
answer
Remedies for violations of protected rights
question
school districts can be assessed when action taken pursuant to official policy violates federaly protected rights
answer
Liability of school officials
question
Any person who acts under state law to deprive another individual of rights is subject to personal liability
answer
42 USC sec 1983
question
1 year minimum or 2 year maximum probation 3 satisfactory evaluations may waive the 2nd year
answer
Educator Employment
question
Told own children that they did not have to attend school; not rehired for cause
answer
Meinhold v. Clark Co. School District
question
Principle dismissed for taking leave of absence while son on a mission: court returned matter to school board and reversed his dismissal
answer
Rust v. Clark Co.
question
Teacher performance designations - Highly effective - Effective - Minimally effective - Ineffective 50% of teacher/principle evaluations based on pupil achievement
answer
New Laws Effective July 1, 2013
question
If unsatisfactory or ineffective or minimally effective, only if you have an evaluation left can you get another person. The second and third time, no.
answer
New Laws Effective July 1, 2011
question
If unsatisfactory, teacher can request another administrator conduct subsequent evaluation - Another district administrator -- Of 3 selected by the superintendent - If teacher request assistance -- Administrator that conducted the evaluation shall "ensure that a reasonable effort is made to assist the probationary teacher or probationary administrator is correcting the deficiencies
answer
New Laws Effective July 1, 2011 - Unsatisfactory
question
Admonition, demotion, suspension, dismissal, and nonreemployment. Current laws do NOT apply apply to probationary employees. Gross misconduct added to list of reasons warranting disciplinary action
answer
New Laws Effective July 1, 2011 Current laws
question
if 1 unsatisfactory evaluation, - 3 evaluations in the next year - If 1, 2, or both evaluations are unsatisfactory -- Same "appeal" process as above regarding choosing another administrator to conduct evaluation - Effectiveness rating replaces satisfactory/unsatisfactory after 7/1/2013
answer
New Laws Effective July 1, 2011 Probationary Teachers
question
A licensed employee is subject to immediate dismissal or a refusal to reemploy according to the procedures provided in NRS 391.311 to 91.3197, inclusive, and section 9 of this act without the admonition required by this section, on grounds contained in paragraphs b, f, g,h, and p and t of subsection. Without admonition.
answer
New Laws Effective July 1, 2011 Immediate Dismissal
question
Dismissal before completion of the year - Can request an expedited hearing 3 1-year probationary periods If dismissed prior to years end, same "rights" as postprobationary teacher Failure to notify by a certain date isn't equal postprobationary status any more 2 out of 3 "satisfactory" (effective or higher) = postprobationary status (reemployment)
answer
New Laws Effective July 1, 2011 - Probationary teachers
question
No longer solely based on seniority Now must consider - Hard to fill position - National Board Certification - Performance evalutions - Disciplinary record - Criminal record (if applicable) - Type of licensure - Type of degree
answer
Reduction in Force (RIF)
question
If "below average" 2 out of 3 years (evaluations) - Must serve another probationary period Collective bargaining agreements no longer supersede state law
answer
New Laws Effective July 1, 2011 Probationary teachers con't
question
Local Board designed Enhanced compensation -Recruitment -Retention Focused on improving student achievement
answer
New Laws Effective July 1, 2011 Performance Pay
question
No more "tenure" as we know it Postprobationary teachers can become probationary again - Based on Satisfactory/unsatisfactory (Effectiveness scale) - Probationary teachers -- 3 1-year contracts with no right to reemployment -Evaluations are multifaceted -RIFs based on individual teacher qualifications
answer
Effectively
question
If dismissed during school year, some -Expedited hearing If simply a nonrenewal - No recourse if notified on or before May 1 2013 - Effectiveness scale 2014 - Performance pay
answer
Limited due process
