Supreme Court Cases/De jure Segregation/De facto Segregation – Flashcards

Unlock all answers in this set

Unlock answers
question
Miranda v. Arizona
answer
Supreme Court held that criminal suspects must be informed of their right to consult with an attorney and of their right against self-incrimination prior to questioning by police.
question
Griswold v. Connecticut
answer
married couple wanted to get contraceptives; struck down a Connecticut law prohibiting the sale of contraceptives; established the right of privacy through the 4th and 9th amendment
question
Engel v. Vitale
answer
banned formal prayer in schools, government would not make any religion the official religion.
question
Engel v. Vitale
answer
banned formal prayer in schools, government would not make any religion the official religion.
question
Gideon v. Wainwright
answer
a landmark case in United States Supreme Court history. In the case, the Supreme Court unanimously ruled that state courts are required under the Sixth Amendment of the Constitution to provide counsel in criminal cases for defendants unable to afford their own attorneys.
question
Escobedo v. Illinois
answer
1964--Ruled that a defendant must be allowed access to a lawyer before questioning by police.
question
Roe v. Wade (1973)
answer
-Warren Burger
-The court legalized abortion by ruling that state laws could not restrict it during the first three months of pregnancy. Based on 4th Amendment rights of a person to be secure in their persons.
question
Death Penalty
answer
-Warren Burger
-Furman v. Georgia 408 U.S. 238: Court ruled that the death penalty, as applied, was an arbitrary punishment and thus unconstitutional under the 8th and 14th Amendments
question
De jure Segregation
answer
segregation that is imposed by law
question
De facto Segregation
answer
segregation resulting from economic or social conditions or personal choice
Get an explanation on any task
Get unstuck with the help of our AI assistant in seconds
New