PSY Chapter 12: Social Psychology – Flashcards
Flashcard maker : Aiden Boyd
Stanford (Zimbardo) Prison Study: What was his motivation to conduct the study?
See how many ordinary men, chosen to be healthy and normal, would respond to a radical change in their normal roles in life.
Stanford (Zimbardo) Prison Study: Population of people
24 College students made the cut, divided into two groups, guards or prisoners, by coin flip.
Stanford (Zimbardo) Prison Study: Attire
Prisoners: A dress, smock with no underclothes with a prison ID number, bolted chain and covered hair
Guards: Guard uniform, weapons
Guards: Guard uniform, weapons
Stanford (Zimbardo) Prison Study: Psychological Tactic
Privilege Cell: 3 prisoners involved in riot given special privileges in order to turn prisoners against each other.
Switched out good with bad prisoners in order to break alliances, divide and conquer.
Switched out good with bad prisoners in order to break alliances, divide and conquer.
Stanford (Zimbardo) Prison Study: Resulting effect on both groups
Produced greater solidarity amongst guards, began to really think prisoners meant harm, no longer just an experiment
Stanford (Zimbardo) Prison Study: Actual Vs. Intended Duration
5 Prisoners had to leave earlier, experiment lasted 6 out of 14 days
Stanford (Zimbardo) Prison Study: Dehumanization
Turning them into objects and instilling in them feelings of hopelessness
Stanford (Zimbardo) Prison Study: De individuation
State of reduced individuality, reduced self awareness and reduced attention to personal standards
Milgram Obedience Study: Theory behind research
Why were the soldiers, ordinary men, coerced into committing such heinous crimes against the Jewish population?
Stanford (Zimbardo) Prison Study: Maximum voltage and response
65%, 26/40 participants administered the 450 volt shock.
Stanford (Zimbardo) Prison Study: Think Vs. Actual
Think: Small fraction would be prepared to inflict the maximum voltage
Actual: 65%
Actual: 65%
Stanford (Zimbardo) Prison Study: Result
When facing the dilemma of obeying an authority figure, most people find it very difficult to disobey authority
Robber’s Cave Study (Sherif)
Groups naturally develop their own cultures, status structures and boundaries, roots of conflict are created, conflict can be resolved by introducing these superordinate goals, stretching beyond the boundaries of the group itself
Robber’s Cave Study (Sherif): The Other studies
1. Boys ganged up on a common enemy (an individual member)
2. Both groups ganged up on the Experimenters
2. Both groups ganged up on the Experimenters
Zimbardo Stanford Prison Study: Overall Result
Power of social roles and the situation/context/environment in which you are placed
Milgram Obedience Experiment: Overall Result
Power of authority on conforming to expectations over moral judgements
Robbers Cave Experiment: Overall Result
Dynamics of intergroup conflict and conflict resolution
Social Psychology main concern
How people influence other people’s thoughts, feelings and actions
Non-Verbal Behavior
Initial impressions largely determined by facial expressions, gestures, mannerisms and movements
Thin slices of behavior
-Seconds long observations provide lasting and often accurate impression
-Soundless 30 second film clips of college teachers lecturing, asked to rate teaching ability, ratings corresponded very highly with the ratings given by the instructor’s actual students
-Soundless 30 second film clips of college teachers lecturing, asked to rate teaching ability, ratings corresponded very highly with the ratings given by the instructor’s actual students
Attributions
Explanations for events or actions, including other people’s behavior
Just World Hypothesis
When bad things happen to people, we make sense of it by blaming the victim, victims must have done something to justify what happened to them
Fritz Heider: Personal Attributions
Things within people, such as abilities, moods or efforts (internal or dispositional)
Fritz Heider: Situational Attributions
Outside events, such as luck, accidents or the actions of other people (external)
Self-Serving Bias: Failures Vs. Successes
F= Situational, unstable or uncontrollable factors in a way that casts us in a positive light
S= Personal, permanent factors in a way that gives us credit for doing well
S= Personal, permanent factors in a way that gives us credit for doing well
Fundamental Attribution Error
Overemphasis of personality traits and underemphasize the importance of the situation
Actor/Observer Discrepancy
Our own behavior= focus is on the situation
Other people’s behavior= focus is on dispositions
IE being late to class
Other people’s behavior= focus is on dispositions
IE being late to class
Self Fulfilling Prophecy
Tendency to behave in ways that confirm our own or others’ expectations (Bloomers Experiment)
Prejudice
Negative feelings associated with a stereotype
Discrimination
Inappropriate and unjustified treatment of people as a result of prejudice
Cooperation and Prejudice
In working together toward a greater purpose, people can overcome intergroup hostilities
Superordinate Goals
Robbers cave experiment: People who work together achieve a common goal often break down subgroup distinctions as they become one larger group
Aronson’s Jigsaw Classroom
-Students work together in mixed race or mixed sex groups
-Each member of their own groups is an expert on one aspect of the assignment and teach their team members
-Each member of their own groups is an expert on one aspect of the assignment and teach their team members
How are attitudes formed?
Through experience and observation
Mere exposure effect
The more we are exposed to something, the more we tend to like it
Explicit Attitudes
Attitudes that a person can report
Implicit attitudes
Attitudes that influence a person’s feelings and behavior at an unconscious level
Festinger: Cognitive Dissonance
An uncomfortable mental state due to a contradiction between two attitudes or between an attitude and a behavior
Ex: People who smoke even though they know smoking might kill them
Ex: People who smoke even though they know smoking might kill them
Insufficient Justification
Changing attitudes can be done by changing behaviors first, using as few incentives as possible ($1 lied more then 20$)
Justifying Effort
When people put themselves through pain, embarrassment to join a group, they experience a great deal of dissonance, to resolve the dissonance, they inflate the importance of the group and their commitment to it.
Social Facilitation
The presence of others enhances performance
Social Loafing
People work less hard when in a group than when working alone
Participants did not shout as loudly when they believed that others were shouting with them
Participants did not shout as loudly when they believed that others were shouting with them
Conformity
Altering one’s behaviors and opinions to match those of other people or to match their expectations
IE. Participant in the middle doubting his own answers
IE. Participant in the middle doubting his own answers
Aggression
Any behavior that involves the intention to harm someone else
-Common in young children but relatively rare in adults
-Common in young children but relatively rare in adults
Prosocial Behavior
Acting for the benefits of others
Why are humans prosocial?
Selfless: Motivated by empathy
Selfishness: To relieve one’s negative mood
Inborn tendency to help others
Selfishness: To relieve one’s negative mood
Inborn tendency to help others
Altruism
Helping when it is needed without any apparent reward for doing so
Why do we behave altruistically?
-Evolutionary Perspective
-Reciprocation
-Reciprocation
Bystander Apathy: Kitty Genovese
Murdered while walking from work in NYC and witnesses did nothing to help
Bystander Intervention effect
The failure to offer help by those who observe someone in need
What do people find most attractive?
Symmetrical Faces
Averaging faces result
Participants rated the averaged faces as more attractive