PSY Chapter 12: Social Psychology – Flashcards

Flashcard maker : Aiden Boyd
Stanford (Zimbardo) Prison Study: What was his motivation to conduct the study?
See how many ordinary men, chosen to be healthy and normal, would respond to a radical change in their normal roles in life.

Stanford (Zimbardo) Prison Study: Population of people
24 College students made the cut, divided into two groups, guards or prisoners, by coin flip.

Stanford (Zimbardo) Prison Study: Attire
Prisoners: A dress, smock with no underclothes with a prison ID number, bolted chain and covered hair
Guards: Guard uniform, weapons

Stanford (Zimbardo) Prison Study: Psychological Tactic
Privilege Cell: 3 prisoners involved in riot given special privileges in order to turn prisoners against each other.
Switched out good with bad prisoners in order to break alliances, divide and conquer.

Stanford (Zimbardo) Prison Study: Resulting effect on both groups
Produced greater solidarity amongst guards, began to really think prisoners meant harm, no longer just an experiment

Stanford (Zimbardo) Prison Study: Actual Vs. Intended Duration
5 Prisoners had to leave earlier, experiment lasted 6 out of 14 days

Stanford (Zimbardo) Prison Study: Dehumanization
Turning them into objects and instilling in them feelings of hopelessness

Stanford (Zimbardo) Prison Study: De individuation
State of reduced individuality, reduced self awareness and reduced attention to personal standards

Milgram Obedience Study: Theory behind research
Why were the soldiers, ordinary men, coerced into committing such heinous crimes against the Jewish population?

Stanford (Zimbardo) Prison Study: Maximum voltage and response
65%, 26/40 participants administered the 450 volt shock.

Stanford (Zimbardo) Prison Study: Think Vs. Actual
Think: Small fraction would be prepared to inflict the maximum voltage
Actual: 65%

Stanford (Zimbardo) Prison Study: Result
When facing the dilemma of obeying an authority figure, most people find it very difficult to disobey authority

Robber’s Cave Study (Sherif)
Groups naturally develop their own cultures, status structures and boundaries, roots of conflict are created, conflict can be resolved by introducing these superordinate goals, stretching beyond the boundaries of the group itself

Robber’s Cave Study (Sherif): The Other studies
1. Boys ganged up on a common enemy (an individual member)
2. Both groups ganged up on the Experimenters

Zimbardo Stanford Prison Study: Overall Result
Power of social roles and the situation/context/environment in which you are placed

Milgram Obedience Experiment: Overall Result
Power of authority on conforming to expectations over moral judgements

Robbers Cave Experiment: Overall Result
Dynamics of intergroup conflict and conflict resolution

Social Psychology main concern
How people influence other people’s thoughts, feelings and actions

Non-Verbal Behavior
Initial impressions largely determined by facial expressions, gestures, mannerisms and movements

Thin slices of behavior
-Seconds long observations provide lasting and often accurate impression
-Soundless 30 second film clips of college teachers lecturing, asked to rate teaching ability, ratings corresponded very highly with the ratings given by the instructor’s actual students

Attributions
Explanations for events or actions, including other people’s behavior

Just World Hypothesis
When bad things happen to people, we make sense of it by blaming the victim, victims must have done something to justify what happened to them

Fritz Heider: Personal Attributions
Things within people, such as abilities, moods or efforts (internal or dispositional)

Fritz Heider: Situational Attributions
Outside events, such as luck, accidents or the actions of other people (external)

Self-Serving Bias: Failures Vs. Successes
F= Situational, unstable or uncontrollable factors in a way that casts us in a positive light
S= Personal, permanent factors in a way that gives us credit for doing well

Fundamental Attribution Error
Overemphasis of personality traits and underemphasize the importance of the situation

Actor/Observer Discrepancy
Our own behavior= focus is on the situation
Other people’s behavior= focus is on dispositions
IE being late to class

Self Fulfilling Prophecy
Tendency to behave in ways that confirm our own or others’ expectations (Bloomers Experiment)

Prejudice
Negative feelings associated with a stereotype

Discrimination
Inappropriate and unjustified treatment of people as a result of prejudice

Cooperation and Prejudice
In working together toward a greater purpose, people can overcome intergroup hostilities

Superordinate Goals
Robbers cave experiment: People who work together achieve a common goal often break down subgroup distinctions as they become one larger group

Aronson’s Jigsaw Classroom
-Students work together in mixed race or mixed sex groups
-Each member of their own groups is an expert on one aspect of the assignment and teach their team members

How are attitudes formed?
Through experience and observation

Mere exposure effect
The more we are exposed to something, the more we tend to like it

Explicit Attitudes
Attitudes that a person can report

Implicit attitudes
Attitudes that influence a person’s feelings and behavior at an unconscious level

Festinger: Cognitive Dissonance
An uncomfortable mental state due to a contradiction between two attitudes or between an attitude and a behavior
Ex: People who smoke even though they know smoking might kill them

Insufficient Justification
Changing attitudes can be done by changing behaviors first, using as few incentives as possible ($1 lied more then 20$)

Justifying Effort
When people put themselves through pain, embarrassment to join a group, they experience a great deal of dissonance, to resolve the dissonance, they inflate the importance of the group and their commitment to it.

Social Facilitation
The presence of others enhances performance

Social Loafing
People work less hard when in a group than when working alone
Participants did not shout as loudly when they believed that others were shouting with them

Conformity
Altering one’s behaviors and opinions to match those of other people or to match their expectations
IE. Participant in the middle doubting his own answers

Aggression
Any behavior that involves the intention to harm someone else
-Common in young children but relatively rare in adults

Prosocial Behavior
Acting for the benefits of others

Why are humans prosocial?
Selfless: Motivated by empathy
Selfishness: To relieve one’s negative mood
Inborn tendency to help others

Altruism
Helping when it is needed without any apparent reward for doing so

Why do we behave altruistically?
-Evolutionary Perspective
-Reciprocation

Bystander Apathy: Kitty Genovese
Murdered while walking from work in NYC and witnesses did nothing to help

Bystander Intervention effect
The failure to offer help by those who observe someone in need

What do people find most attractive?
Symmetrical Faces

Averaging faces result
Participants rated the averaged faces as more attractive

Get an explanation on any task
Get unstuck with the help of our AI assistant in seconds
New