Negotiation Exam 1 – Flashcards

Unlock all answers in this set

Unlock answers
question
Distributive bargaining
answer
win-lose bargaining
question
Target/aspiration point
answer
point at which negotiator would like to conclude negotiations; optimal deal
question
resistance point
answer
price beyond which someone will not go; most they will pay as a buyer/smallest amount they will as seller
question
bargaining range
answer
spread between resistance point
question
positive bargaining range
answer
buyer's RP above seller's
question
negative bargaining range
answer
seller's Rp above buyer's; likely to lead to stalemate
question
BATNA
answer
best alt to a negotiated agreement
question
settlement point
answer
both parties want to end up better than their RP
question
bargaining mix
answer
several factors in a deal,e ach with their own RP's, targets, and startings
question
the higher the other party's estimate of your cost for delay, the ____ their RP will be
answer
stronger; if they see you really need something, they can sieze the advantage
question
the higher the other party's estimate of their own cost for delay, the ____ their RP will be
answer
weaker; convince them that the cost of not doing the deal is high, and they will be more modest in their RP
question
the less the other party values an issue, the ___ their RP will be
answer
lower; make them think things aren't as important, and they will deem it less important
question
the more the other party believes you value an issue, the ___ their RP may be
answer
lower; you put more pressure on them to set more modest RP
question
Tactical tasks - 4 steps
answer
Assess, Manage, Modify, Manipulate
question
Tactical tasks - Assess
answer
assess other party's RP, target, cost of termination; indirect (observations, talk to others), direct (info they give you)
question
Tactical tasks - Manage
answer
manage their impressions; screening activities (silence, say/do as little as possible), selective presentation
question
Tactical tasks - Modify
answer
modify other party's perceptions; one approach is to explain that their desired outcome actually has different effects than what they want; conceal info
question
Tactical Tasks - manipulate
answer
manipulate actual costs of delaying or terminating negotiations; disruptive action (increase cost for them not to settle), alliance with outsiders, schedule manipulation
question
Role of concessions
answer
people are less satisfied when they aren't made; immediate perceived as less valuable, bigger concession the more likely they are further from TP
question
Closing the deal
answer
SEAPS - split the difference, exploding offers, assume the close, sweeteners
question
Hardball tactics - how to deal with them
answer
ignore, discuss, respond in kind, befriend other party
question
Typical hardball tactics
answer
BLAINS CC - Bogey, Low/Highball, Agressive, Intimidate, Nibble, Snow job, Chicken, Cops
question
Bogey
answer
pretending that an issue is extremely important even when it isn't; can be bad as other party will try and get you to care about something you don't
question
Low/Highball
answer
suggest outrageous offer; risk of other party thinking negotiation is a waste of time; good counteroffer is asking the person for a more realistic offer
question
Agressive
answer
can combat by halting negotiations to address process itself
question
Intimidation
answer
guilt/legitimacy can be used; to combat you can pretend it doesn't affect you or say you want a fair negotiation
question
Nibble
answer
ask for something in exchange at the end...something that party won't risk deal over but that will help you
question
Snow job
answer
releasing huge amount of info when only a little is needed; combat, ask questions/don't be afraid to continue
question
Chicken
answer
making big bluffs until someone calls someone else out; to counter you can make your own chicken bluffs or call them out
question
Cops - bad/good
answer
can sometimes backfire because it's distracting to put all that effort into it; can combat by calling them out
question
4 steps to integrative negotiation
answer
IUGE - identify/define, understand, generate solutions, evaluate alternatives
question
Integrative - identify/define problem
answer
set broad parameters for what negotiation is about, provide initial framework for approaching discussion
question
Integrative - understand problem
answer
bring interests/needs to surface; clearly define all problems; state problem as goal and then find out how to work towards it
question
Integrative - generate alt solutions
answer
brainstorming; avoid jumping/evaluating solutions, separate problem from people, ask outsiders
question
Integrative - evaluate
answer
evaluate alternatives and select among them
question
Pareto efficient frontier
answer
when there is no agreement that would make any party better off without decreasing outcomes to any other party
question
Position vs interest
answer
interest is what you want, position is what you're doing to get it
question
types of interest
answer
substantive, process relationship
question
substantive interest
answer
what issues are
question
process interest
answer
how issues are resolved
question
relationship interest
answer
related to how parties value each other
question
why is integrative negotiation difficult
answer
old conflicts die hard, fixed-pie bias, mixed-motive nature of negotiations, short time perspectives, extreme cooperation
question
ways to generate win-win solutions
answer
ELMS N' BCC expanding pie, logroll, modify pie, superordination, nonspecific compensation, bridge, compromise, cut costs
question
logrolling
answer
when there are multiple issues, splitting them up so both parties can benefit
question
modifying resource pie
answer
changing resources available
question
expanding resource pie
answer
adding resources so both can benefit
question
bridge
answer
inventing new options that meet all respective needs
question
cuttings costs for compliance
answer
where you make it so that the party that agrees has cut costs for doing so
question
nonspecific compensation
answer
compensate the other person for accommodating interests
question
superordination
answer
occur when differences in interest that gave rise to conflict are superseded or replaced by other interests
question
common vs shared vs joint goals
answer
common - all parties share equally shared - one both parties work toward but benefits each differently joint - individuals with different personal goals agreeing to combine them in collective effort
question
Strategy vs tactics
answer
tactics are short-term, adaptive moves designed to enact or pursue broad strategies
question
unilateral vs bilateral approaches
answer
unilateral means it is a choice made without active involvement of other party
question
dual concerns model
answer
substantive/relational, both either important or unimportant collaboration (YY) accommodation (NY) competition (YN) avoidance (NN)
question
planning process
answer
check notes
question
perception process
answer
S A R T B stimulus, attention, recognition, translation, behavior
question
halo effects
answer
occur when people generalize about variety of attributes based on knowledge of one attribute
question
selective perception
answer
occurs when perceiver singles out certain info that support or reinforces prior belief
question
projection
answer
people assign to others characteristics they themselves are feeling
question
substantive framing
answer
what conflict is about; parties taking substantive frame have a particular disposition about key issue/concern
question
outcome framing
answer
party's predisposition to achieving a specific result; more likely in distributive than integrative
question
aspiration framing
answer
predisposition toward satisfying broader set of interests/needs in negotiation; rather than focus on outcome, focus on basic interests/needs/concerns; more likely in integrative
question
process framing
answer
how parties will go about disputing; less concerned about specific negotiation issues but more about how deliberation will proceed
question
identity framing
answer
how parties define "who they are"
question
characterization framing
answer
how they define other parties
question
loss-gain framing
answer
how parties define risk of reward associated with particular outcome
question
frames - interests, rights, power
answer
interests - people often concerned about what they need, desire, want rights - people concerned about who is right - that is who has legitimacy, who is correct, what is fair power - people may elect to frame negotiation on basis of power
question
Escalation of commitment
answer
tendency for individual to make decisions that stick with a failing course of action; helpful to have another person to help you avoid this
question
mythical fixed-pie beliefs
answer
people who believe it's win-lose situation; introduce accountability to help avoid this
question
anchoring/adjustment
answer
once anchor is defined, parties tend to treat it as real...avoid by having thorough prep
question
issue framing and risk
answer
way issue is framed influences how negotiators perceive risk in relation to it; risk-averse when something is gain and risk-seeking when loss
question
availability heuristic
answer
how easy something comes to mind
question
winner's curse
answer
tendency of negotiators to settle quickly and then feel as if they came too easily; best way to avoid is to do research beforehand so your first offer isn't possible to get this
question
overconfidence
answer
tendency to believe that their ability to be correct is greater than it actually is
question
law of small #'s
answer
tendency of people to draw conclusions from small sample sizes (negotiators relying on their own experience)
question
self-serving biases
answer
FAE, tendency to think things were more unfair to yourself than others
question
endowment effect
answer
once something is yours, you overvalue it
question
ignoring others' cognitions
answer
ignoring what other party is thinking, which is done probably because it makes the complex task of decision making under risk a lot easier
question
reactive devaluation
answer
devaluing other party's concession simply because they made them; minimize by maintaining objective view
question
pre-negotiation stage of multiparty negotiations
answer
characterized by great deal of informal contact; participants agree on who is going to be invited to talks, coalitions, defining group member roles
question
formal negotiation stage - multiparty negotiations
answer
appoint a chair, use/restructure agenda, ensure diversity of information,
question
3 ways to achieve good discussion during multiparty negotiations
answer
delphi technique - moderator structures initial questionnaire/sends it out to all parties, back and forth brainstorming nominal group - after brainstorming, rank/rate alternatives
question
Four steps to integration
answer
IBGE - identify/define problem, bring interests to surface, generate multiple solutions, evaluate alternatives and select among them
question
Integration steps - define the problem
answer
is definition of problem acceptable to both sides? separate problem from solutions, set specific goals, depersonalize
question
Integration steps - bring interests to surface
answer
with goals, focus on interests and not positions
question
integration steps - generate multiple solutions
answer
position accommodation/achievement, interests achievement/substitution
question
position accommodation
answer
logrolling/compromise
question
position achievement
answer
modifying/expanding pie
question
interest achievement
answer
cost-cutting/bridging
question
interest substitution
answer
nonspecific compensation/superordination
question
integration steps - evaluate/select alternatives
answer
narrow your final option range; be able to justify your preferences; watch out for intangibles; take a break
Get an explanation on any task
Get unstuck with the help of our AI assistant in seconds
New