Abstract
In this experiment, a simply supported beam is used and the variations of deflection of a simply supported beam with load, beam thickness and material are investigated. It is found that the deflection of the beam changes linearly with the load and as the beam thickness increases, the beam deflection decreases. In addition, since different materials have different modulus of elasticity, deflection of different materials under a specific load is different. Depending on the results of the experiment, it is observed that the measured deflection values under different loads and for different materials overlap the Euler-Bernoulli Beam Theory.
Introduction
Beams can be described as a structural element that withstands load. Although beams are considered mainly as building
...structural elements, automobile or machine frames also contain beams to support the structure. Some applications require beams to support loads that can bend the beams, therefore it is important to observe the behavior of the beams under bending forces and which parameters have an effect on this behavior. If the maximum deflection that the beam can resist were not taken into consideration in the design process, there would be some serious failures in structures that can lead to some serious outcomes. In this experiment, an overhanging beam is used, which can be defined as a beam simply supported at two fixed supports and having both ends extended beyond the supports. In order to conduct this experiment and to investigate the variation of deflection of a simply supported beam, an apparatus that contains two support points is used. During the experiment, the relationship between the deflection and the load is to be observe
by changing the load applied to the same beam. At the end of the experiment, it is expected that the deflection of the beam is linearly proportional to the applied load as Euler-Bernoulli Beam Theory suggests. The equation of Euler-Bernoulli Beam Theory is as follows:
In this equation, w represents the deflection of the beam, E represents the modulus of elasticity of the material, I represents the second moment of area of the beam and q represents the distributed load, which can also be described as force applied per unit length.
In addition, the effect of the beam thickness on the deflection is another effect to be investigated. Depending on the beam theory, it is anticipated that the deflection of the beam is inversely proportional to the third power of the beam thickness. By this experiment, the relation between the deflection and beam thickness can also be observed and proved. Lastly, the effect of material on the deflection of the beam is to be examined, as well. Euler-Bernoulli Beam Theory suggests that deflection of the beam is inversely proportional to the modulus of elasticity. Since different materials have different elastic modulus, through this experiment, it will be proven that the materials having higher elastic modulus deform less under the same load than the ones having lower modulus of elasticity.
Theory
In construction industry and literature a beam is usually referred to a structural member which is generally horizontal and used to support generally horizontal loads such as floors, roofs, and decks. Similarly, in mechanical engineering applications and in science literature, a beam is explained as a component that is designed to
support transverse loads, that is, loads that act perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of the beam. In order to make the building and structure more stable and stronger against impacts and loads, beams are generally applied as a solution. Since there are numerous material types and numerous different shapes of materials, beams can also be found in different shapes. It can be also observable that some properties of beams can also vary from one to another due to the type difference such as ductility, stiffness and so on. Since beams are used to compensate the loads within the structures, there are different types of beam loads available. For instance; there are uniform beam loads, varied beam loads by length, single point beam loads and combination beam loads which include all types of loading.
Sometimes beams are experienced some deflections from their equilibrium states towards a completely new state due to loads applied. The direction of the deflection highly depends on the direction of load applied. There are different beam theories postulated up to now to describe the behaviour of beams under loading. The theory that is accepted and applied for this experiment is named as Euler-Bernoulli Beam Theory.
There is a requirement for this theory to be applied on a beam. Namely, the length of the beam should be at least 20 times of the thickness of it. Actually the more the ratio gets higher, the more the theory and calculations are valid.
There are also some assumptions made with respect to this theory. In fact, they are all related with normals of the beam itself. First assumption is that normals do
not bend. Secondly, normals remain unstreched. If we take into consideration both two assumptions, it can be easily obtained the conclusion that normals remains normal. If the Euler-Bernoulli Beam Theory is applied on a beam, this means that these assumptions are done and the requirement is met.
In all theories, there are also some formulas used in this theory. Some of the formulas needed to apply the Euler-Bernoulli Beam Theory are as follows;
where p is the distributed loading (force per unit length) acting in the same direction as y (and w), E is the Young's modulus of the beam, and I is the area moment of inertia of the beam's cross section.
Experimental Procedure In this experiment, there are different beams lenghts and types are used. The reason for this experiment is carried on is to learn the applicability of the Euler-Bernoulli Beam Theory on loaded beams. There are 3 different steel beam are used to see the effect of different thickness to deflection. There also 3 different types of materials are used such as brass, steel and aluminum to see the effect of modulus of elasticity to deflection.
As the first step; the steels beams are selected to be tested in an order as 3 mm, 4.5 mm and 6 mm. Before testing each steel beam, the deflection gage is set at zero (0) value. After placing the 3 mm steel beam on the experiment apparatus and the gage is set to zero value, the beam is subjected to some loading right in the middle section. Firstly, 2N load is applied and the displacement gage' s value is read.
Then 2N more is applied, and total load achieved to 4N and the displacement value is read. This procedure is repeated by 2N weights until the total load is 8N. After measuring the 3 mm steel' s displacement values, we proceeded to 4.5 mm steel beam. The same procedure is also applied for both 4.5 mm and 6 mm steel beams.
Secondly, different types of beams (different modulus of elasticities) are selected. Initially the displacement value of aluminum beam is measured with the very same procedure as in steel beams. The values in the displacement gage are read after each 2N weight addition. As final step, the brass is experienced. It is placed on the apparatus and displacement values read repeatedly.
After carrying out all these steps, we get some displacement values of same materials with different thicknesses and different materials with the same thicknesses to see the effect of different properties of materials on displacement according to the Euler-Bernoulli Beam Theory. Finally we are expected to have some graphs showing these relationships and some calculations regarding this theory.
Figure B : Max Deflections of Different Materials Under Various Loads Figure B : Max Deflections of Different Materials Under Various Loads Using the tabulated data, the following graph can be obtained to show how each sample deflected under various loads. The graph shows us that under the same applied load, 3 mm Steel deflects the most, followed by 6 mm Aluminum, 4.5 mm Steel, 6 mm Brass, 6 mm Steel respectively. As mentioned above, the theory suggests that the deflection can be expressed as PL/48EI. If this equation is used to calculate
the theoretical deflections, the following graph is obtained.
Figure C : Theoretical Deflections of Different Materials Under Various Loads.
Figure C : Theoretical Deflections of Different Materials Under Various Loads Figure C also shows a similar trend in terms of the amount of deflection of the materials under the very same load. Although Figure B and Figure C seem similar at a first glance, a closer look reveals that the slopes of the graphs are different. However, since the trends are exactly the same, some error should have been made in the experimental setup or there was a calibration mistake. The errors will be discussed thoroughly in the upcoming pages.
Figure D : Variation of Maximum Deflection With Thickness
Figure D : Variation of Maximum Deflection With Thickness The next aspect to consider is the effect of thickness in deflection. To observe this phenomenon, steel samples should be observed. If the steel data are isolated, the following graph is obtained.
Figure D clearly shows that as the thickness of the beam increases, it is harder to deflect it. This statement also agrees with the theory, which suggests that deflection is inversely proportional with the moment of inertia of the beam. The moment of the inertia of the beam increases as its thickness increases, therefore deflection should decrease.
The experiment also aims to show how the material property affects maximum deflection. To look at this effect, the thickness is standardized at 6 mm and steel, aluminum, brass data are extracted from Table A to obtain the upcoming graph.
Figure E : Variation of Maximum Deflection With Material Type.
justify;">Figure E depicts the effect of elastic modulus (E) on the maximum deflection of a beam under the same loads. As the elastic modulus increases, it is harder to deflect the beam. This conclusion also coincides with the theory since it also suggests that the elastic modulus and the deflection amount are inversely proportional.
To see the effects of moment of inertia and elastic modulus on the maximum deflection, it is important to examine the slope vs. moment of inertia and slope vs. elastic modulus graphs. Since the moment of inertia depends and varies with h3, it is enough to observe the change in slope with varying h3. To obtain Figure F, the slopes of Figure D are recorded and graphed accordingly.
Analysis of results
The outcome of this experiment showed that some factors play an important role in beam deflection. Elastic modulus and the moment of inertia are two of the key important parameters in beam deflection. As they increase, beam’s deflection decreases. The data showed the same trend with the theory, but lacked precision. However, if a more generalized theory (equation) is used, such as mPL3/EI, the results are really close. This equation is also appropriate because the configuration of the experiment just differs the m values. By doing such, the error is minimized and much more accurate data may be obtained.
There might have been some uncertainties in the results due to the calibration errors, setup errors and such. Also load calibrations were not checked prior to the experiment so they might have been inaccurate as well.
The results of the experiment came out just as they
were expected. It was easy to bend thinner beams and also the ones with a lower elastic modulus. These predictions were both inferred from common sense and from the theory itself.
Conclusion
To conclude, a simply supported beam is used and the changes of deflection of a simply supported beam with load, beam thickness and material are analyzed. It is observed that the deflection of the beam changes linearly with the load and as the beam thickness increases, the beam deflection decreases. Moreover, deflection of different materials under a specific load is different, because different materials have different modulus of elasticity. Depending on the results of the experiment, it is observed that the measured deflection values under different loads and for different materials are consistent with the Euler-Bernoulli Beam Theory.
- Automobile essays
- Bus essays
- Civil engineering essays
- Cycling essays
- Electric Car essays
- Genetic Engineering essays
- Hybrid essays
- Innovation essays
- Internal Combustion Engine essays
- Invention essays
- Mechanical Engineering essays
- Mechanics essays
- Software Engineering essays
- Telephone essays
- Experiment essays
- Explorer essays
- Hypothesis essays
- Observation essays
- Qualitative Research essays
- Research Methods essays
- Theory essays
Unfortunately copying the content is not possible
Tell us your email address and we’ll send this sample there.
By continuing, you agree to our Terms and Conditions.