Debate Vocabulary – Flashcards

Unlock all answers in this set

Unlock answers
question
The opposite of a hasty generalization. A fallacy that asserts that something generally considered true applies to all of the examples.
answer
Accident
question
Trying to debate in a way that pleases the judge.
answer
Adapting
question
An attack on the debater, not the argument. This type of attack can also be used to attack someone for the group she belongs to.
answer
Ad hominem attack (Attack on the person)
question
The part of the affirmative's policy case that demonstrates the positive effects of the affirmative's plan.
answer
Advantage
question
The side or team in a debate that supports the resolution.
answer
Affirmative
question
When explaining a plan of action, this describes who will perform the action.
answer
Agent of action
question
A statement in which faulty grammar confuses the situation.
answer
Amphiboly
question
An argument that supports associations between things based on their similarity or dissimilarity.
answer
Analogy
question
When you make statements to show how the facts are connected to the claim or provide the reasoning for your arguments. Also called a warrant.
answer
Analysis
question
A fallacious argument that occurs when a person's opinion of something is considered the last word without allowing an argument against it.
answer
Appeal to authority
question
A fallacious argument that occurs when a debater uses the popularity of a person, product, or belief to justify a conclusion about that person, product, or belief.
answer
Appeal to the people
question
What is the most suitable or fitting for the time and place.
answer
Appropriate
question
A controversial statement, frequently called a claim, supported by grounds (evidence) and a warrant. The standards of a logically good argument are acceptability, relevance, and sufficiency. See also standard of acceptability, standard of relevance, standard of sufficiency.
answer
Argument
question
The process of creating an argument that occurs when you are "making" an argument for or against some viewpoint.
answer
Argument construction
question
To pronounce or say words clearly and slowly.
answer
Articulate
question
A point in an argument.
answer
Assertion
question
An argument that supports a claim with the opinions of experts in the field.
answer
Authority
question
A sheet of paper on which the judge records the decision (who won the debate), the reasons for the decision (why that team won), and speaker points awarded to each debater.
answer
Ballot
question
A fallacy of acceptability that occurs when a debater introduces evidence that is the same as the claim.
answer
Begging the question
question
A process of listing as many ideas on a topic as you can think of.
answer
Brainstorming
question
A legal term for a written, shortened version of an argument; arguments with evidence prepared in advance of a debate for quick reference.
answer
Brief
question
What a team (usually the affirmative but not always) must do to prove its case and win the debate.
answer
Burden
question
The requirement to provide evidence to support a claim.
answer
Burden of proof
question
The requirement to provide an argument against an argument advanced by the other team.
answer
Burden of refutation
question
The requirement to provide the latest argument in a chain of arguments.
answer
Burden of rejoinder
question
One or more arguments sufficient to support a proposition.
answer
Case
question
When the affirmative presents their arguments to accept the proposition.
answer
Case argument
question
In a refutation against an off-case argument, this is a type of disadvantage The plan is the cause; the effect is the negative impact of the argument.
answer
Cause-effect argument
question
A definition in which a term is defined by using the same term.
answer
Circular definition
question
A controversial statement an arguer supports using reason. Claims can be fact claims, policy claims, or value claims.
answer
Claim
question
Directly answering the other team's argument in a debate.
answer
Clash
question
A proposition where more than one thing needs to be proved.
answer
Complex statement
question
The two person negative team in Public Forum debate.
answer
Con
question
To make comments about a performance in a positive way to motivate and educate.
answer
Constructive criticism
question
A speech that presents a debater's basic arguments for or against a resolution; new arguments are allowed.
answer
Constructive speech
question
See observations.
answer
Contentions
question
The words, phrases, or passages that come before and after a word in a speech that helps to explain its meaning.
answer
Context
question
The specific definition for the value term considering the time, place, and context of the argument at hand.
answer
Contextual definition
question
Another term for Public Forum debate. See Public Forum.
answer
Controversy
question
A false cause fallacy is an argument that incorrectly contends that two things are causally related when in fact they are not linked but simply related to a third thing that caused them both.
answer
Correlation
question
A case presented by the negative to respond to the affirmative.
answer
Counter-case
question
The negative's specific points in their counter-case
answer
Counter-contentions or counter-observations
question
A plan proposed by the negative team as an alternative to the affirmative plan.
answer
Counter-plan
question
Given when a debater asserts a point without providing evidence and the other side asserts the opposite.
answer
Counter-point
question
Something you have when the audience thinks you know what you are talking about.
answer
Credibility
question
Something that must be proven to win; the most important values or standards in a debate.
answer
Criteria
question
A person who is able to listen carefully to what other people and the other team say and remember necessary bits of information.
answer
Critical listener
question
A process or skill that involves thinking about how you think. It is the process of asking and answering questions and trying to understand the process and reasons why you came to the conclusions that you did.
answer
Critical thinking
question
A judge's written comments on a ballot
answer
Critique
question
A period during the debate when a member of one team asks questions of a member of the opposing team.
answer
Cross-examination
question
A part of Public Forum debate when both teams are allowed to question each other in a brief period of time.
answer
Crossfire
question
The process of arguing about claims in situations where a judge must decide the outcome.
answer
Debate
question
The arrangement of a debate with rules establishing time limits, speaking order, and manner in which a debate will be conducted. Various formats of debate exist, each with its own way of debating.
answer
Debate format
question
The win or loss given by a judge in a debate; speaker points for each debate may also be part of the decision.
answer
Decision
question
To provide for the judge a way to weigh the round and decide who won the debate.
answer
Decision rule
question
To read evidence word for word to support a claim.
answer
Direct quotation
question
A refutation in which you point out the flaws in the opponent's argument.
answer
Direct refutation
question
The harm that will come from a plan.
answer
Disadvantage
question
A statement in which the speaker denies responsibility or connection.
answer
Disclaimer
question
Discussion.
answer
Discourse
question
Categories in a competition such as novice, junior, or open.
answer
Divisions
question
For example
answer
e.g.
question
In describing a plan, the person or agent who will make sure the plan is carried out.
answer
Enforcement
question
A fallacy of language that occurs when a word is used in two different ways and the meaning of the word shifts during the argument.
answer
Equivocation
question
Different types of information (facts, statistics, theories, opinions, or narratives) that are used to support arguments; evidence can be divided into two categories: that relating to reality (facts, theories, and presumptions) and that relating to preference (values, value hierarchies, and value categories).
answer
Evidence
question
Evidence given to support a claim from a source that has credibility because of education, study, research, or experience in the field.
answer
Expert opinion
question
Observed or observable data.
answer
Facts (evidence)
question
When the proposition has enough arguments on both sides so that the debate is fair.
answer
Fair ground
question
An argument that does not have good reasoning and that fails to meet any one of the standards of acceptability, relevance, or sufficiency.
answer
Fallacy
question
All analogies are false analogies, as they provide no warrants or evidence to support a claim.
answer
False analogy
question
A fallacy involving warrants; includes post-hoc fallacies and correlations. See post-hoc fallacies; correlations.
answer
False cause
question
A response dating from our ancestors who had to protect themselves from wild animals by fighting or running away. In modern times your brain thinks a speaking situation is a dangerous situation, so your body tries to find a way to increase your strength through a faster heartbeat, increased oxygen in the body, and anxious movements.
answer
Fight or flight response
question
The method of paying for a proposed plan.
answer
Financing
question
When you write down the arguments in a debate.
answer
Flow/Flowing
question
Notes taken during a debate, usually written in columns so that arguments from each team can be written next to each other and can flow across the page.
answer
Flow sheet
question
The speaking positions and times in a debate.
answer
Format
question
See Financing.
answer
Funding
question
The process of a judge deciding who did a better job of debating.
answer
Gives a win
question
The proposition or opposition side of a debate, Is also referred to as gov
answer
Government
question
The team affirming the resolution in a Parliamentary Debate. Also called the gov.
answer
Government team
question
See evidence.
answer
Grounds
question
To answer a set of arguments with one or more arguments rather than a line-by-line refutation.
answer
Grouping
question
A problem that currently exists in the status quo because of attitudes or laws that permit it.
answer
Harm
question
A fallacy of reasoning whereby a conclusion is based on one or a few examples that may be too few or not like the rest of the larger group being discussed.
answer
Hasty generalization
question
The minimal value at which a condition is acceptable.
answer
Highest Value
question
That is. (in other words)
answer
i.e.
question
To explain why an argument is important.
answer
Impact
question
Unstated reasoning process that explains the relationship between the evidence and the claim.
answer
Implied warrant
question
When you speak with little to no preparation time.
answer
Impromptu speaking
question
Attitudes or laws that allow a condition (harm) to exist; the cause of the problem.
answer
Inherency
question
A wrong statement of measurement.
answer
Invalid
question
Tournaments in which debate teams participate by invitation.
answer
Invitational tournaments
question
An observer of a debate who has the responsibility of deciding which team has done a better job of debating.
answer
Judge
question
An experienced debater who is no longer a novice but has not won at the junior level.
answer
Junior
question
Authority.
answer
Jurisdiction
question
A debate format that matches two three-person teams against each other: one team affirming the proposition and the other team opposing it; each team has one constructive speech presenting its basic arguments for and against the proposition and two constructive speeches refuting the opposing team's arguments and summarizing its own.
answer
Karl Popper Debate
question
The final one-minute speech allowed by both sides in a Public Forum debate.
answer
Last shot
question
A judge who has never seen a debate before or is not an expert debate judge.
answer
Lay judge
question
The first oppositional speaker in Parliamentary Debate.
answer
Leader of the opposition
question
This debate format has only one person on a team (affirmative or negative). The same topic can be debated throughout the year. In college, a policy topic is used, whereas in high school a separate value topic is debated.
answer
Lincoln-Douglas Debate
question
The presentation of something in a straight line. The linear way of organizing means that you present one idea after another in a specific way so that the audience can follow the line of ideas you are using to prove your arguments.
answer
Linear
question
When a team refutes every point in the opponent's case.
answer
Line-by-line refutation
question
The specific action a plan requires.
answer
Mandate
question
The affirmative speaker who speaks after the Leader of the Opposition in Parliamentary Debate.
answer
Member of the government
question
The negative speaker who speaks after the Member of the Government in Parliamentary Debate.
answer
Member of the opposition
question
A manner of speaking in which everything sounds the same.
answer
Monotone
question
When it is still uncertain who will win the argument.
answer
Moot
question
A topic of argument.
answer
Motion
question
A way of presenting information by telling a story in your own words.
answer
Narrative
question
The part of the affirmative case about policies that identifies a certain problem in the status quo that the existing system cannot solve.
answer
Need
question
The side in a debate that rejects the resolution.
answer
Negative
question
This general term is used when anyone provides an argument in which the claim or conclusion does not follow from the reasoning or grounds provided.
answer
Non sequitur
question
A beginning debater, usually having debated less than 30 rounds or not having won a tournament.
answer
Novice
question
A statement involving something that can be proved by observable phenomena or measurable facts.
answer
Objective statement
question
This occurs when we make a statement and then have some agreed measurement to prove the truth of that statement.
answer
Objective verification
question
Specific points addressed in a debate.
answer
Observations
question
Negative argument against a plan that would have its own organization, usually flowed on separate paper from the case.
answer
Off-case argument
question
Negative argument against the issues that were defended in the first affirmative speech
answer
On-Case Argument
question
A debater with the highest level of experience in tournaments, separate from the novice and junior divisions. Anyone can compete as an open debater, even a novice, but it is generally harder for a novice to win as an open debater.
answer
Open debater
question
The term used for the other team, regardless of what side you are debating.
answer
Opponent
question
The team negating the propositional team in Parliamentary Debate.
answer
Opposition
question
Spoken, not written.
answer
Oral
question
The judge's oral explanation of the decision right after the debate.
answer
Oral critique
question
Writing notes in an organized way.
answer
Outlining
question
A version of policy debate in which no cross-examination is allowed.
answer
Oxford-style debate
question
Explaining evidence in your own words.
answer
Paraphrasing
question
A debate format in which the two teams take on the role of governmental leaders. This format requires a different topic for every round.
answer
Parliamentary Debate—NPDA
question
A version of Parliamentary Debate in which four teams compete at the same time: two teams on the propositional side and two teams on the oppositional side.
answer
Parliamentary Debate—World's Style or European/British Parliament)
question
The ability to talk to others with ease.
answer
People skills
question
Role playing to present the best arguments for an issue.
answer
Perspective taking
question
A course of action proposed by the affirmative when debating a proposition of policy intended to solve the problems identified by the "need" or "harm" arguments.
answer
Plan
question
The individual points of a plan, which include the agent of action, the mandates, financing, and enforcement.
answer
Planks
question
A significant, outstanding, or effective idea, argument, or suggestion; an assertion.
answer
Point
question
When a team calls for a point of order and the judge decides to allow the argument to stay in the round.
answer
Point not well taken
question
To seek permission to interrupt the speaker for the purpose of asking a question or clarifying or making a point during a Parliamentary Debate.
answer
Point of information
question
To interrupt a speaker in a rebuttal speech to ask the judge to make a decision about whether a new argument was offered in a rebuttal speech.
answer
Point of order
question
When a team calls for a point of order and the judge decides that it is a new argument and does not allow the argument.
answer
Point well taken
question
A debate format in which opponents debate a policy (usually a governmental policy) currently in effect. Typically debaters have the same topic for the entire school year and read evidence, word for word.
answer
Policy Debate
question
Occurs when a debater assumes that because one thing happens before another, the first must have caused the second.
answer
Post hoc fallacy
question
The beginning rounds in a tournament before the elimination rounds. All teams compete in the preliminary rounds. Six preliminary rounds are standard for most tournaments in the United States.
answer
Preliminary rounds
question
The time allotted to each team for preparation during the debate (eight minutes in Karl Popper Debate).
answer
Preparation time
question
The assumption that current policies will be maintained until someone makes a case that another policy is a better option.
answer
Presumption
question
A statement concerning what people ordinarily expect to happen in the course of normal events.
answer
Presumption (evidence)
question
Latin for "on first face"; a requirement of cases presented that means that all necessary issues are present.
answer
Prima facie
question
The first propositional speaker in Parliamentary Debate.
answer
Prime Minister
question
The two-person affirmative team in Public Forum debate.
answer
Pro
question
A claim made by a debater and supported by a combination of claims: a statement to be proven (fact, value, or policy).
answer
Proposition
question
See government team.
answer
Propositional team
question
A statement that can be proven with some kind of a measurement.
answer
Proposition of fact
question
A statement that makes a recommendation that a certain action should be taken.
answer
Proposition of policy
question
A statement that tries to prove an opinion.
answer
Proposition of value
question
A debate forum that is audience-oriented usually without expert debate judges allowed. Topics are new each month and are chosen for their balance of evaluative arguments on both sides. Evidence is encouraged but usually not read directly, and should be part of the decision by the judge.
answer
Public Forum
question
This statement describes in words why a value is important in a debate.
answer
Qualitative significance
question
This statement provides numerical or statistical evidence of why an issue is important in a debate.
answer
Quantitative significance
question
When an adjective or adverb is added to a term to form an additional argument.
answer
Question-begging epithet
question
The process used to connect evidence to a claim; providing reasons for something. See also warrant.
answer
Reasoning
question
The speeches in a debate that challenge and defend arguments introduced in the constructive speeches; no new arguments are allowed.
answer
Rebuttal speeches
question
Three tests for all evidence that examine the age of the evidence, whether the evidence proves a point, and whether the source can be trusted.
answer
Recent, relevant, and reliable
question
A fallacious argument that shifts the focus from the original argument.
answer
Red herring
question
The process of attacking and defending arguments.
answer
Refutation
question
To prove something wrong.
answer
Refute
question
An argument given, regarding the last argument of the other team, about why they are wrong, why you are right, and the impacts of your argument.
answer
Rejoinder
question
The process of locating and selecting evidence in preparation for debate.
answer
Research
question
A debate topic specifically worded to make for fair debates.
answer
Resolution
question
An observation that provides the framework for the affirmative's case; it may include definition of terms, context, criteria, value, and decision rule.
answer
Resolutional analysis
question
A statement at the beginning of a speech letting everyone know the order of a debater's speech.
answer
Roadmap
question
When all of the teams are debating at the same time.
answer
Rounds
question
A system of writing that uses abbreviated words and symbols to rapidly record what is being said.
answer
Shorthand
question
An issue that is important.
answer
Significance
question
To provide the order of the organization of the arguments to be presented.
answer
Signposting
question
Arguments that explain why a plan will cure the harm.
answer
Solvency
question
Nervousness about speaking or giving a speech in public.
answer
Speech anxiety
question
Means of evaluating a term or value accepted by all parties.
answer
Standards
question
What a judge says when a team calls out, "point of order." When a judge calls for a team to state its point, then the team must explain why the argument from the other team was not mentioned in the constructive speeches and is therefore new.
answer
State your point
question
Evidence expressed in numbers.
answer
Statistics
question
The course of action currently in use (i.e., the present system).
answer
Status quo
question
The main arguments necessary to prove a case; in Policy Debate the stock issues for the affirmative are need, significance, inherency, plan, and solvency.
answer
Stock issues
question
To prevent something bad from happening.
answer
Stop a harm
question
A fallacy that occurs when an arguer, intentionally or unintentionally, misinterprets an opponent's argument and then proceeds to refute the misinterpreted argument as if it were the opponent's actual argument.
answer
Straw argument
question
See straw argument.
answer
Straw man
question
The language, voice, and body language used by a debater.
answer
Style
question
A belief or attitude that cannot be proven and that is typically biased.
answer
Subjective opinion
question
When a team calls for a point of order and the judge decides later if the argument is new or not.
answer
Taken under consideration
question
The act of constantly moving your hands when you talk.
answer
Talking with your hands
question
See circular definition.
answer
Tautology
question
See Public Forum.
answer
Ted Turner Debate
question
Word or phrase
answer
Term
question
A statement in support of a fact or claim. An expert opinion.
answer
Testimonial
question
A statement that explains other facts or that predicts the occurrence of events.
answer
Theory
question
At the beginning of a debate or speech, a statement given to let the audience know exactly what your speech is about. It consists of only one sentence to tell the audience the purpose: to inform, to persuade, or to entertain.
answer
Thesis statement
question
The point in an argument at which you have provided enough evidence to prove your argument.
answer
Threshold
question
A term that means that it is best to stay with the status quo since the affirmative has not proven that its plan is better.
answer
Tie goes to the negative
question
An area for discussion or debate.
answer
Topic
question
An instance where the affirmative team does not debate the resolution.
answer
Topicality
question
A model of argument developed by philosopher Stephen Toulmin. The basic model includes claim (statement), ground (evidence), and warrant (analysis).
answer
Toulmin Model
question
A series of debates in which a number of teams or debaters compete to win.
answer
Tournaments
question
Three main parts of an argument: claim, grounds, and warrant.
answer
Triad
question
True or legitimate.
answer
Valid
question
Evidence based on the audience's preferred value.
answer
Value
question
A case supporting a proposition of value; three principal elements of such a case are describing, relating, and evaluating.
answer
Value case
question
Ways that the other team has not met the standard of the topic.
answer
Violations
question
An instance when the judge does not have jurisdiction or when a debater will summarize the winning arguments in a rebuttal speech.
answer
Voting issue
question
Stated or unstated reasoning process that explains the relationship between the evidence and the claim.
answer
Warrant
Get an explanation on any task
Get unstuck with the help of our AI assistant in seconds
New