Climate Change and Policies in Canada Essay Example
Climate Change and Policies in Canada Essay Example

Climate Change and Policies in Canada Essay Example

Available Only on StudyHippo
  • Pages: 4 (1094 words)
  • Published: November 19, 2021
View Entire Sample
Text preview

Climate change affects countries globally, including Canada, and has detrimental effects on living organisms.

The environment in Canada has been greatly affected by industrialization, resulting in negative climate consequences. Those involved in industrial activities have shown little regard for the environment, leading to uncontrolled generation of waste products (Dupuis, & Biesbroek, 2013). These substances are discharged into the ecosystem, causing increased pollution and harm to the environment.

The environment's vulnerability to disease and the unsuitability of the air for breathing were caused by a common problem. The implementation of federal regulations played a crucial role in mitigating the impact of human actions on the environment. Climate change resulted in the development of unpredictable weather patterns. This was primarily caused by pollution.

Climate change has significant implications in various domains. In the scientific realm, it plays a crucial role in generating predictions and devising effec

...

tive strategies. The challenge posed by climate change has pushed scientists to develop innovative approaches to address its many facets. From a political perspective, climate change entails an increase in the cost of implementing mitigation policies, which can add to the government's financial burden (Kasischke & Stocks, 2012). Philosophically, climate change necessitates philosophers to formulate theories and methods to improve people's perceptions and facilitate positive transformations. Considering these different aspects, it becomes evident that climate change has a detrimental impact on countries in scientific, philosophical, and political contexts.

Every sector has a crucial role in preventing climate change issues from dominating the state.

Canada’s Commitment

The Canadian government acknowledges the recommendations of global climate organizations. Recently, it has implemented legislation and regulations that organizations must adhere to in order to safeguard the environment. The pollution bill, as identified

View entire sample
Join StudyHippo to see entire essay

by Wolf, Allice, and Bell (2013), is particularly significant for Canadians as it controls the impact of industrialization on climate. These stringent laws have established an eco-friendly ecosystem that prevents industries from engaging in unprofessional activities. Additionally, the government has allocated extra funds to raise awareness about environmental protection as part of its efforts to address climate concerns (Schmidt, Ivanova, ; Schafer, 2013).

Increased funding has led to a greater understanding and awareness of the importance of protecting and preserving the environment. Civil education is empowering society to plant more trees, which aids in reducing the harmful effects of greenhouse gases. There is an ongoing debate about discontinuing pipeline transportation of oil due to its negative impact on marine life in case of accidental spills. The government is considering replacing fossil fuels with renewable energy sources like solar power to address their toxic gas emissions and contribution to climate change.

INDC Commitment

The Canadian government may face challenges in achieving their Intended Nationally Determined Contributions (INDC) target of reducing emissions by 30%.

Greenhouse farming is becoming more popular because of its high productivity, surpassing other farming methods (Cameron, 2012). However, this trend has resulted in increased greenhouse gas emissions, which have a negative impact on atmospheric air circulation. Despite the fact that the $10 taxes do not significantly affect the country's operations, they impede the achievement of INDC by 2030 according to the stated vision.

Critics of the policy argue that it was implemented without consulting locals, which hampers its feasibility and leads to disagreements. Countries worldwide have different goals for addressing climate change. Third world countries, in particular, set higher targets surpassing Canada's 30% due to more significant environmental

pollution levels. Victor (2012) states that Saskatchewan and Manitoba provinces in Canada had divergent opinions on the INDC targets. While Saskatchewan strongly disagreed with the proposed degradation control rate by 2030, Manitoba expressed support for it.

The divergence arose because of divergent thinking by policy regulators in the two provinces. Several other provinces were enthusiastic about the matter as they recognized the enduring advantages. The taxes levied are deemed unjust by Saskatchewan residents, causing concern about the progress of INDC (Intended Nationally Determined Contributions). The province placed minimal emphasis on the environment and the importance of promoting an eco-friendly and equitable environment. They believed that citizens had little role to play in realizing the INDC and were only responsible for their own tasks.

Manitoba residents had motivation and were eager to monitor progress and control the environment to keep it hospitable and meaningful. However, politics in the province of Saskatchewan spread the belief that the INDC policies were a conspiracy designed to limit the execution of provincial functions by dictating which projects to undertake. These factors contributed to widening the gap in views towards the INDC policy. On the other hand, Manitoba and other provinces had a positive attitude towards the INDC, believing it would help mitigate environmental problems. They wanted to experiment and hear positive responses about efforts to reduce pollution dominance.

Through strong provincial leadership, the leaders acknowledged the benefits of economic integration. The provinces in support argued that a better world is possible by 2030 if all stakeholders remain committed and focused on success. The high level of acceptance greatly contributed to the commitment to achieve the projected visions of the INDC. In my opinion,

I see the INDC as positive because of its long-term economic benefits. Therefore, its implementation should be gradual, even if it means extending the set timelines, to ensure all parties involved in the greenhouse effect have enough time to adapt. Continuous awareness campaigns and government support will encourage the development of environmentally friendly projects by showcasing better investment opportunities.

In the process, the rate of pollution shall become mitigated making prevalence of illness resulting from climatic changes to decline to a quantifiable extent.

References

  • Cameron, E. S. (2012). Securing Indigenous politics: A critique of the vulnerability and adaptation approach to the human dimensions of climate change in the Canadian Arctic. Global Environmental Change, 22(1), 103-114.
  • Dupuis, J., ; Biesbroek, R. (2013). Comparing apples and oranges: the dependent variable problem in comparing and evaluating climate change adaptation policies. Global Environmental Change, 23(6), 1476-1487.
  • Kasischke, E.

S., & Stocks, B. J. (Eds.). (2012).

The text discusses a book titled "Fire, climate change, and carbon cycling in the boreal forest" published by Springer Science & Business Media. Additionally, it mentions a research paper titled "Media attention for climate change around the world: A comparative analysis of newspaper coverage in 27 countries" by Schmidt, A., Ivanova, A., & Schafer, M. S.

Global Environmental Change, 23(5), 1233-1248.

  • Victor, P. A. (2012). Growth, degrowth and climate change: A scenario analysis.
  • The text includes a citation from the journal Global Environmental Change (volume 23, issue 5) with the page numbers 1233-1248. The citation also includes an article by Victor, P.A. titled "Growth, degrowth and climate change: A scenario analysis" published in 2012.

    Ecological Economics, 84, 206-212.

    Global Environmental Change, 23(2), 548-562.

    Get an explanation on any task
    Get unstuck with the help of our AI assistant in seconds
    New