Amnesty for Illegal Immigrants Is Not in the Best Interest of the Tax Payer Essay Example

more of it, which is a common sense and historical fact. The attached photograph depicts a US Border Patrol Officer apprehending five illegal immigrants. Unfortunately, the use of forged paperwork by illegal immigrants has become rampant these days and should not be condoned. McAuliffe and Munoz (2005) pointed out that immigrants, many undocumented but with phony documents, are increasingly becoming the ones doing agricultural and construction work among others, and employers are not required to investigate their authenticity.

Both native-born Americans and aspiring citizens from other countries highly cherish the status of being a United States citizen. It is crucial that this status carries weight, which requires gaining knowledge and understanding of the nation's laws, as well as abiding by them.

Prospective citizens should possess an inherent desire to acquire English proficiency and embrace our customs. Although preserving their own traditions is significant, rejecting the language and culture of the society they aspire to become a part of is not tolerable. In certain areas such as Texas and California that border Mexico, migrants affirm their roots while simultaneously impeding their endeavors for legal status.

On the U.S. side of the border, it's not rare to spot an American flag hanging upside down beneath a Mexican one, which is a mockery of American citizenship. It's surprising that people who seek America's opportunities would do this. Legalizing immigration through amnesty can have negative effects on the economy, as demonstrated by the Bingaman amendment allowing around 66 million legal immigrants into the country in twenty years.

Rector (2006) notes that taxpayers are often uninformed about various forms of amnesty, which can cover a span of 20 years. These categories - the Spouses

and Children of Amnesty Recipients, the Spouses and Children of guest Workers, and the Parents of New naturalized Citizens - make up almost 14 percent but tend to be overlooked.

The number of people impacted by amnesty, which does not include qualified immigrants or guest workers, exceeds 5 million. As research continues, this number is anticipated to rise significantly. Those who qualify for amnesty may receive benefits including Social Security, Earned Income Tax Credit, union wages, and reduced college rates. Offering benefits unavailable to citizens to those who entered the country illegally is inappropriate. The financial impact of amnesty on taxpayers is staggering and difficult to grasp.

During their retirement years, the illegal immigrants who receive amnesty through S.1348 are anticipated to place a financial burden of no less than $2.6 trillion on taxpayers in the United States.

According to Rector (2007), every category of expenditure such as healthcare, education, and law enforcement would experience a surge in costs. These supplementary expenses would ultimately be borne by taxpayers. As a result, the United States would incur increased financial obligations.

It is contradictory to American principles and honor that citizens should cover the living costs of illegal immigrants within our nation. Through diligence, we support our families and it is unreasonable to anticipate us to subsidize individuals who are not citizens and who refuse to comply with lawful procedures for obtaining citizenship.

The question arises as to why American citizens should be responsible for funding the residency of illegal immigrants who refuse to comply with the laws. Granting amnesty to these individuals would cause a surge in the National Deficit, estimated at around 29 billion dollars. The chart provided depicts more

common increases at 9.6 billion dollars. As the National Debt continues to increase rapidly, offering amnesty will only exacerbate this issue. Negotiations with foreign nations for credit arrangements must take place, further contributing an unknown amount towards our current national debt which already exceeds $8.

Williamson (2006) warns that giving amnesty to undocumented immigrants could result in a significant increase in the national debt, which would adversely affect the economy and restrict foreign credit. Moreover, as prices of essential items like fuel and food continue to escalate, while the housing industry struggles with high rates of foreclosures, it is crucial to ponder over the future implications for succeeding generations of US citizens.

The American public perceives that the current funding for the war in the Middle East is being done through credit by the US government.

As American citizens, we are aware of credit limits and the possible outcomes if they are exceeded. This causes us to question both a card's limit and our proximity to it. However, we must reconsider the notion of adding to this financial burden by granting amnesty to undocumented immigrants. The present economic situation is already problematic, and forcing U.S. taxpayers to cover the costs of amnesty for these individuals exacerbates matters.

The U.S. government must avoid imposing high expenses on American taxpayers as a result of immigration, even though immigrants who strive to improve their lives and families deserve acknowledgement and assistance. It is crucial that they abide by the law, and those who do not should be promptly deported.

On June 18, 2008, a news article titled "Sneaky Amnesty Tricks In Iraq Supplemental Bill" was retrieved from HumanEvents.com and authored by

Anderson, E. (2008).

The House of Representatives in Washington is the subject of an article by R. Keller on humanevents.com, published on May 11, 2006. The text is contained within

tags.The source information for US Congressman Ric Keller from the 8th District of Florida can be found at http://keller.house and was retrieved on June 5, 2008. The information is enclosed within a HTML paragraph tag.

Visit the website gov/News/DocumentQuery.aspx?Year=2006 to read an article from McAuliffe and Munoz published on September 7, 2005 in The Republican.

A study examining the economic effects of undocumented immigrants on the country is detailed in a report sourced from http://www.masslive.com/news/republican/index.ssf?news/immigrants/090705immigrants, accessed on June 18, 2008.

According to R. Rector from The Heritage Foundation on June 6, 2007, providing amnesty to immigrants will result in costs for the United States.

The web page titled "Taxpayers at Least $2.6 Trillion" (WebMemo #1490) by R. Rector can be found at http://www.heritage.org/research/Immigration/wm1490.cfm. This information was accessed on June 5, 2008.The website HumanEvents.com reported on May 19, 2006 that a Senate bill had been passed which would result in the addition of 66 million immigrants to the population. The article can be found by accessing the following URL: http://www and was retrieved on June 18, 2008.The article with the identifier of 14998 on humanevents.com was written by Williamson, K and published on May 26, 2006 by BNet Business Network.

Examining the Expenses of Granting Amnesty: A significant number of our country's leaders advocate for conferring permanent residency and amnesty.