Federalism and the French Canadians Essay Example

in the constitutions were proposed since the laws were not favorable. In summary, the author has clearly used pieces of evidence that support the thesis.

The writer puts a very persuasive argument in his article. The article begins by introducing what it takes a country to exercise its sovereignty. He states what a country must have to exercise its sovereignty such freedom, common purpose and differentiated roles if lacking, then country is not free. Such encourage people to demand these essential elements of sovereignty, which are lacking. Telling people what is democratically theirs means he wants them to realize that they are not free, and something must be done to secure the sovereignty. He further explains how a dignity citizen should live. He gives the model of citizens’ dignity by including the political dignity, which he uses as a wake-up call for the citizen to start fighting for equality. Some people are valued more while other have not dignity at all. Such message is a strong call for equality as universal requirements. He argued the country was breaking up due lack of respect for human dignity.
He further gives the meaning of federalism and nationalism. He tries to critic how the nationalism is pursued in French Canada calling for the end of the system were attacking opponents order of the day. He argues that nationalism does not offer equal rights to all citizens hence it is not a good system of governance. He argues that liberalism means equal rights for all citizens, which in practically not available since the government favored some people since it did not put into consideration cultural distinctions. He questions the reason the

federal government was culturally insight.

The respect of human rights, which is universal rights for all citizens was fundamentally ignored he tries to g ive the different case where citizens are denied fundamental right such as in judicial system showing some discrimination in the system. issues of unfair representation in government are people`s constitutional right, but people are denial. He accused the government of making its people slaves. He urges that education is a weapon to fight against injustice and equality hence educated people to need to act.

In his argument, present of Quebec power means present of foreign powers and the country is not free. He argues people have no option rather than fighting for their freedom. His ability brings out advantages of sovereignty make him persuasive.