The Origins of Consciousness Essay Example

the most molecular level forming larger globs of itself, eventually causing supermassive structures. These structures clash into each other just like the particles they are composed of, creating mayhem upon the neighboring materials and themselves. These structures collide and crumble, breaking off pieces of themself over and over again for millions of years until finally the first solar systems are born.

Among the growing population of solar systems is our home star system. Our star system finally calmed down. In this new fashion of unity among celestial neighbors, our earth gradually ceased to be a volcanic lava based planet. Temperatures lowered, allowing water vapor to cool, forming our oceans.

It’s at this point that life has its opportunity to begin. But how it does so is a mystery. The common theory of life’s ascension is due to a billion years of ocean molecules mixing around, being jolted by lightning repeatedly, until one day, the first cell is born, which then multiplies.

“The Urey-Miller experiment suggested that the conditions on earth 4.5 billion years ago led to the formation of certain key organic molecules, which assembled themselves into larger molecules that eventually went on to form the first cell. However, much of the optimism that this experiment generated began to fade under the cloud of an impenetrable paradox.”

According to Joseph Panno, PhD’s book “The Cell” paradoxically, “Modern cells depend heavily on an interaction between proteins and nucleic acids (DNA and RNA). The proteins are used to construct the cell, and a special group of them, called enzymes, control the many chemical reactions that are necessary for cells to live.

DNA is a collection of blueprints, or genes, that store the

information to make the proteins. One kind of RNA, called messenger RNA (mRNA), serves as an intermediary between the genes and the cell’s machinery for synthesizing proteins. Although it is possible for nucleic acids and proteins to self assemble, it is extremely unlikely that the modern relationship between the three developed spontaneously.

It comes down to the age-old question of which came first, the chicken or the egg: the nucleic acids or the proteins? Could DNA, or RNA, have self-assembled and then orchestrated the synthesis of the proteins? Or did the proteins self-assemble and then make their own blueprints using DNA, while ignoring RNA altogether?”

What is it that allows us to perceive reality in the way that we do? Why do chemicals in our brain affect our overall perspective on reality and the things around us? There are many cognitive filters to experience many things through, but why? What’s the point in any of this complex format sense of awareness?

Just like when the ancients asked 'Why does the sun come up every day? Why does the earth exist? why does our body exist? why does our brain exist?” But most importantly here; why does our brain use this format of software to maneuver through reality? Our brain could’ve used any sort of operating system to function, but it landed on this one.

Cats can see ultraviolet, dogs smell things that we could never even attempt to smell, bees perceive the world so abstract from our perception that it’s almost inconceivable, and these are just to name a few. The universe as we know it started up from a single point. it expanded, things cooled, energy turned into

heavy elements, eventually leading to the earth.

Where did the first source of life come from? I don't mean from an asteroid, or the possibility of certain elements just creating life. No. My question is why the Universe allows more than just elements and entropy. Why does life exist at all? Why did WE come from this seemingly mechanical bubble of reality? The universe has evolved through it’s stages just like life itself. Everything we know and love is all derived from a single point of energy.

It then expanded, which allowed everything to cool, our form of reality came to be, and eventually, there will be a heat death once all this energy is dispersed evenly throughout the universe. What sentient/non-sentient purpose could the universe have for life's existence? We came from the universe just like all the elements on the periodic table. It just happened later on. Why? My hypothesis is geared towards consciousness because I suspect our consciousness has access, though limited, to higher dimensions.

Let’s say you’re on the ground. Can you see the town right over? No. You cannot. But if you went higher up in altitude you could. Same with consciousness. If we were the size of a virus, would we be able to see clouds and trees? probably not because our plane of existence would be in between the molecules that comprise the clouds and trees. Our reality would be of a different plane.

So let’s go in the other direction; let’s start in a normal human size, and go macro. If we were to become giants, we would be able to see more of the universe at a time, but in

a more concentrated scale.

I suspect the universal dimensions are loosely relatable to a pyramid. If we go higher on this pyramid, we can see more of it at a time. What I’m basing this off of is using the thought frame that the universe is indeed comprised of many MANY layers that we can’t even comprehend with our little five-pound brains.

We can perceive so much more than basic creatures like germs or jellyfish. As time goes on, life has become more and more complex due to various forms and demonstrations of entropy. The universe is also this way. Being that we are comprised of the very material of the universe, yet we are able to consider things that may only potentially exist in the future, it's a sound theory that human consciousness is five-dimensional (most animals are limited to approximately four-dimensions of consciousness.

A dog doesn't premeditate much, though they are capable of it. Most creatures, at least mammals can tap into this framework of thought if attempted, but premeditation is just intuitive to the root of human existence. Using history as a demonstration, it’s a reasonable assumption that life will only get more and more complex as it is allowed to exist.

Throughout eons people have dabbled with the thoughts of god or gods, then we finally became more scientific as a species and landed on our existence as being mere chance, and it probably is, but there's more to that question.

We have a sound theory as to how we exist, we have a theory as to what we are to an extent, though not fully, and what we have even less grasp on is why

we exist. To sum it up, since we are innately part of the universe ; a complex part of it at that and not just merely visitors from outside the universe, secrets of the universe surely can be found in us in some way.

The ultimate question is why the universe exists, then why life exists and what our connection to is. It seems once humanity started going towards science more universally, spirits, consciousness and such were brushed under the table because the technology wasn't there yet to figure any of it out.

Now, we still haven't quite reached that paradigm, but I suspect that our bodies and minds may emit a sort of radiation that our tools of science have yet to tap into the frequency of. I want to find it, because I feel at least finding more forms of radiation in organisms, especially the human brain is our best bet to finding our connection to the universe itself.

In this article, they discuss theory-based data to create a potential model of our world’s future social structures. What will the general perspectives of man be regarding the world around them? How malleable will these perspectives be? What value will time hold for society? How will human interaction be? These are all valid sociological questions that may bring a sort of light to the overall question: Where are we going?

This article holds a refreshingly internally analytical sense as to what consciousness is; spiritual if you will. It suspends the evidence-analyzation approach but instead goes at it in a philosophical, very introspective breakdown. Consciousness is not an object but a medium for us to be able to perceive

objects the way we do.

This article attempts to use the modern technology of quantum dots to analyze both the brain and DNA. It theorizes the ability to scan DNA pairs to predict psychological development using these tools of science. The goal here is to bring psychology to a more serious scientific forefront than ever before.

How may we contrast the validity of the thought of one individual against the other? Perhaps through the coherence of the individuals’ thoughts and ideas; responses. Why are we able to contrast them at all? What paths were taken by our ancestors that would lead to such diverse levels of intellect but evergrowing perception via consciousness? Does intellect even play a role in the clarity of one’s consciousness at all? Perhaps the answers lay in the fundamental space-time based nature of our universe.

Using tools of science to acquire evidence, this article puts philosophical jargon on the back burner and provides an unrelenting stream of evidence to support their claim that consciousness is merely a tool our brains use to keep us alive. It’s a collaboration of multiple parts of our brains working together to create the byproduct that is consciousness.

This Book breaks down the history of the Cell and how life itself began and is maintained on our planet.