Public Oral Communications Lecture 7 – Flashcards
Unlock all answers in this set
Unlock answersquestion
starting points (empirical, topical)
answer
common grounds you locate between yourself and your composite audience that will allow you to build conviction toward your conclusion
Empirical Starting points: Dealing in certainty, concrete evidence
Topical Starting points: Are able to establish a consensus to build on in areas where there is no certainty
question
warrant (enthymematic, syllogistic)
answer
what motivates the leap from something familiar or acceptable that your audience feels comfortable with, to your claim that is unfamiliar, strange, or difficult to accept.
Enthymematic warrants: Ethos (argue by example) Pathos (argue by implication)
Syllogistic warrants: Logos (Argue by inference)
question
topoi (i.e., topical starting points, 'persuadables', premises)
answer
establishes common ground
question
indubitable (certain) starting points
answer
certain, factual
question
topical discourse
answer
These float around our communities, circulate through our lives, are picked up and used by all of us, and inform our judgments. They can be prejudicial and narrow minded, but they also index the values of community and provide resources for thinking.
question
example
answer
brings a vivid picture to our eyes that makes the argument compelling
question
sign
answer
Can the sign be found without the thing
question
cause (and difficulty of inference from cause)
answer
Answer to why something happened--we can't always determine the direct cause of things
question
analogy
answer
Clarify an unfamiliar subject by comparing an unknown relationship with a known relationship
question
fallacies
answer
False or misleading arguments
question
lecture criterion for testing an analogy
answer
1. Compare the relevant similarities of the relationship.
2. Compare the relevant dissimilarities of the relationship.
3. Weigh the strength of (1) against (2).
question
strengths & weaknesses of argument from example
answer
A good example brings a picture before our eyes that makes its inference compelling.
Examples may not be statistically sound
question
degrees of support
answer
unlike mathematical proofs, rhetorical proofs haves degrees of support ranging from strong to weak. As a result, both speakers and listeners must evaluate proofs critically, testing them rather than taking them for granted.