Please enter something

Business Law 5 & 6

question

Intentional Tort
answer

A category of torts that requires that the defendant possessed the intent to do the act that caused the plaintiff’s injuries.
question

Assault
answer

1. The threat of immediate harm or offensive contact or 2. any action that arouses reasonable apprehension of imminent harm. Actual physical contact is unnecessary.
question

Battery
answer

Unauthorized and harmful or offensive direct or indirect physical contact with another person that causes injury.
question

Transferred Intent Doctrine
answer

Under this doctrine, the law transfers the perpetrator’s intent from the target to the actual victim of the act.
question

False Imprisonment
answer

The intentional confinement or restraint of another person without authority or justification and without that person’s consent.
question

Merchant Protection Statutes (Shopkeeper’s privilege)
answer

Statutes that allow merchants to stop, detain, and investigate suspected shoplifters without being held liable for false imprisonment if 1. there are reasonable grounds for suspicion, 2. suspects are detained for only a reasonable time, and 3. investigations are conducted in a reasonable manner.
question

Misappropriation of the Right to Publicity (tort of appropriation)
answer

An attempt by another person to appropriate a living person’s name or identity for commercial purposes.
question

Invasion of the right to privacy
answer

The unwarranted and undesired publicity of a private fact about a person. The fact does not have to be untrue.
question

Defamation of Character
answer

False statement(s) made by one person about another. In court, the plaintiff must prove that 1. the defendant made an untrue statement of fact about the plaintiff and 2. the statement was intentionally or accidentally published to a third party.
question

Libel
answer

A false statement that appears in a letter, newspaper, magazine, book, photograph, movie, video, etc.
question

Slander
answer

Oral defamation of character
question

Disparagement (trade libel, product disparagement, and slander of title)
answer

False statements about a competitor’s products, services, property, or business reputation.
question

Intentional Misrepresentation (fraud or deceit)
answer

The intentional defrauding of a person out of money, property, or something else of value.
question

Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress (tort of outrage)
answer

A tort that says a person whose extreme and outrageous conduct intentionally or recklessly causes severe emotional distress to another person is liable for that emotional distress.
question

Malicious Prosecution
answer

A lawsuit in which the original defendant sues the original plaintiff. In the second lawsuit, the defendant becomes plaintiff and vice versa.
question

Unintentional tort (negligence)
answer

A doctrine that says a person is liable for harm that is the foreseeable consequence of his or her actions
question

Duty of Care
answer

The obligation people owe each other not to cause any unreasonable harm or risk of harm.
question

Reasonable Person Standard
answer

A test used to determine whether a defendant owes a duty of care. Measures the defendant’s conduct against how an objective, careful, and conscientious person would have acted in the same circumstances.
question

Actual Cause (causation in fact)
answer

The actual cause of negligence. A person who commits a negligent act is not liable unless actual cause can be proven.
question

Proximate Cause (legal cause)
answer

A point along a chain of events caused by a negligent party after which this party is no longer legally responsible for the consequences of his or her actions.
question

Professional Malpractice
answer

The liability of a professional who breaches his or her duty of care.
question

Negligence Infliction of Emotional Distress
answer

A tort that permits a person to recover for emotional distress caused by the defendant’s negligent conduct.
question

Negligence per se
answer

A tort in which the violation of a statute or an ordinance constitutes the breach of the duty of care.
question

res ipsa loquitur
answer

A tort in which the presumption of negligence arises because 1. the defendant was in exclusive control of the situation and 2. the plaintiff would not have suffered injury but for someone’s negligence. The burden switches to the defendant to prove that he or she was not negligent.
question

Good Samaritan Law
answer

A statute that relieves medical professionals from liability for ordinary negligence when they stop and render aid to victims in emergency situations.
question

Superseding Event (intervening event)
answer

An event for which a defendant is not responsible. The defendant is not liable for injuries caused by the superseding or intervening event.
question

Assumption of the risk
answer

A defense a defendant can use against a plaintiff who knowingly and voluntarily enters into or participates in a risky activity that results in injury.
question

Contributory Negligence
answer

A doctrine that says a plaintiff who is partially at fault for his or her own injury cannot recover against the negligent defendant.
question

Comparative Negligence (comparative fault)
answer

A doctrine under which damages are apportioned according to fault.
question

Strict Liability
answer

Liability without fault; a tort that makes manufacturers, distributors, wholesalers, retailers, and any others in the chain of distribution of a defective product liable for the damages caused by the defect.
question

Product Liability
answer

The liability of manufacturers, sellers, and others for the injuries caused by defective products.
question

Negligence of Product Defect
answer

A tort related to defective products in which the defendant has breached a duty of due care and caused harm to the plaintiff.
question

Intentional Misrepresentation (fraud)
answer

A tort in which a seller or lessor fraudulently misrepresents the quality of a product and a buyer is injured thereby.
question

Punitive Damages
answer

Monetary Damages that are awarded to punish a defendant who either intentionally or recklessly injured the plaintiff.
question

Defect in Manufacture
answer

A defect that occurs when a manufacturer fails to 1. properly assemble a product, 2. properly test a product, or 3. adequately check the quality of a product.
question

Defect in design
answer

A defect that occurs when a product is improperly designed.
question

Crashworthiness Doctrine
answer

A doctrine that says automobile manufacturers are under a duty to design automobiles so they take into account the possibility of harm a person’s body striking something inside the car in case of a car accident.
question

Failure to warn
answer

A defect that occurs when a manufacturer does not place a warning on the packaging of products that could cause injury if the danger is unknown.
question

Government Contractor Defense
answer

A defense which provides that contractors that manufacture products to government specifications are not usually liable if such product causes injury.
question

Abnormal Misuse
answer

A defense that relieves a seller of product liability if the user abnormally misused a product.
question

Supervening Event
answer

An alteration or a modification of a product by a party in the chain of distribution that absolves all prior sellers from strict liability.
question

Statute of Limitations
answer

A statute that requires an injured person to bring an action within a certain number of years from the time that he or she was injured by a defective product.
question

Statute of Repose
answer

A statute that limits the seller’s liability to a certain number of years from the date when the product was first sold.
question

Contributory Negligence for a Defective Product
answer

A defense that says a person who is partially responsible for causing his or her own injuries may not recover anything from the manufacturer or seller of a defective product.
question

Comparative Fault for a Defective Product
answer

A person who is partially responsible for causing his or her own injuries is responsible for a proportional share of the damages and the manufacturer or seller of the product are responsible for the remainder of the plaintiff’s damages.