Why Did the Us Lose the War in Vietnam? Essay Essay

essay A
  • Words: 1513
  • Category: Database

  • Pages: 6

Get Full Essay

Get access to this section to get all the help you need with your essay and educational goals.

Get Access

Answer with mention to the construct of insurgency/guerrilla warfare. The longest war in the history of the United States of America has taken topographic point in Vietnam during the Cold War. “The US fright of a Communist Europe led them to step in in a war that was non seen in a critical importance or that would non be in the country`s involvement to derive any advantage” ( Bernstein 1987/8. p. 86 ) . One of the chief grounds why the United states lost the war in Vietnam was the deficiency of readying and apprehension of the Vietnamese civilization. The Vietnamese combatants had several advantages due to the states geographical location and linguistic communication barrier. Furthermore. the insurgence in Vietnam was about impossible for the US soldiers to contend off as they seldom encountered any enemy. On the other manus the Vietnamese military personnels were ready to give themselves in the name of the greater good for the fatherland. Furthermore. the US support to the unstable political system in South Vietnam and the media influence over the American society had turned to be the western world power major drawbacks.

Throughout this essay. the chief statements of why America lost the war and what guerilla war is. will be evaluated in footings of books and diaries. When the Gallic forces were defeated by the ground forces of Ho Chi Minh in the fiftiess. the American president Dwight. D. Eisenhower refused to accept the peace retreat of France. and the division between South and North Vietnam. The US president chose to assist South Vietnam in contending with the Communist motions in Southeast Asia. The US fright of excessively strong Soviet Union led them to acquire involved in Vietnam War. with purpose to avoid the Communist spread in Asia and so in Europe. what Berman called the “Domino thesis” . In 1950 the US started to back up France economically and sent military advisers. Soon after the Gallic military personnels were defeated. the US took the mission to forestall Ho`s program of a communist state. In the undermentioned old ages the US engagement escalated and in 1965 the US president Lyndon Johnson sent American military personnels.

The US authorities had subsidized and politically simulated the constitution of the province of South Vietnam. to compensate the inhibitory government. which intended to glorify Vietnam into a subnational Soviet democracy. One of the cardinal points that the war experts in this period did non step is why France was defeated so significantly. What was the important advantage that Minh`s little ground forces had? The Vietnam struggle can be reviewed like unconventional and insurgency war. The Guerrilla warfare was decidedly the chief Vietnamese benefit. The US battalions faced plentifulness of troubles while seeking to make their enemy due to the fact that the Viet Cong ground forces had no uniforms. front lines and it consisted of a few 100 work forces. The biggest issue for the American commanding officers was non how to get the better of the enemy. but how to turn up them. The US tactic “search and destroy” puts 1000s of American military personnels seeking the Viet Cong ground forces into the jungle. The intents were to happen and destruct every bit much as possible enemies and capture their resources. By busying these chief points the Americans were able to weaken the enemy.

Plenty of the war experts and the functionaries argued that the western world power forces should hold used counter-insurgency scheme. which allowed to set guerillas in to a conventional war. Nevertheless. the Vietnamese leaders were to the full prepared to defy the US invasion. The Viet Cong and The North Vietnamese ground forces habitues may non hold been supported by an heavy weapon. armored combat vehicles or aircraft ( except in rare cases ) . but however they conducted large-scale conventional operations against the US military personnels. ( Rottman G. 2006. p. 7 ) The radical forces had big cyberspace of resistance tunnels which were located all around the state and were immensely used for distribution of all types of things that were utile for the resistance such as medical specialties. arms and nutrient. Peoples were indispensable for the Guerrilla war as they were bases and providers. The Vietnamese ground forces used tactic called “Hit and Run” . They were formed in little groups which were easy to replace in instance of casualties.

Their onslaughts were non aimed to diminish enemy Numberss. but to undermine cardinal figures such as high ranked diplomats. politicians and influential capitalists. The Vietnamese commanding officers had the important advantage because they knew where the American soldiers were. On the other manus the Vietnamese were about unseeable. really good concealed and ready for surprise onslaughts. This benefit gave the Vietnamese war leaders better places when it came to taking the location and the clip of the conflict. The conventional war that the US was put to deathing did non give them a opportunity to travel fast in the jungle. This slow motion of the US military personnels gave the radical the chance to derive the provincials support with anti-imperialism political orientations or even force. As the war progressed the co-operation between the Viet Cong and the North Vietnamese military personnels became far more organized and structured. therefore doing some of the most important impacts upon the US forces.

The Tet offense of 1968 was one of the great events of the Vietnam War. a high point military action. and. in all likeliness. the lone conflict in the war that will be long remembered. ( Schandler. 1977 p. xi ) On January 31 1968 Viet Cong and North Vietnamese launched a series of coincident and co-ordinated onslaughts against the major population countries. towns and metropoliss. all around South Vietnam. The violative was aimed chiefly at civilian centres of authorization and military bid installings. General William Westmoreland. who commanded the US military operations in Vietnam in this period. acknowledged: “The extent of this offense was non known to us. although we did experience it was traveling to be widespread. The timing was non known. I honestly did non believe they would presume the psychological disadvantage of hitting at Tet itself. so thought it would be before or after Tet. I did non expect that they will strike at the metropoliss and do them their targets” . ( Schandler. 1977. p. 64-75 ) Another of import factor related with the US failure was the unstable political state of affairs in South Vietnam.

Diem`s direction was successful in the beginning of the war when the US started to back up them economically. In this short period of clip betterments were rapidly made. Nonetheless. Diem`s leading shortly turned into a government which was perceived as a monolithic repression amongst the people of South Vietnam. Consequently. the domestic support decreased quickly and the population was easy manipulated from the guerillas who were “feeding their heads with anti-imperialism and incredulity towards democracy” ( Jaimeson L. . 1993. p238 ) . Besides. the US attempts to win the “hearts and minds” of the South Vietnamese population were unsuccessful. One other important factor because of which the US lost the war was the media. The US leaders faced plentifulness of protests and anti-war motions.

It was the first war broadcasted on the telecasting. The intelligence could non conceal the intolerable truth of the US battle and failure in the Vietnam war from the audience. Throughout huge assortment of beginnings such as exposures. short movies and intelligence studies the American populace was able to pull its ain decision of the events happening in Vietnam. It was obvious for the US society that the war continued without clear way and aims. The pandemonium. the sum of casualties and the devastations in Vietnam decreased the domestic support for the war. In contrast. the continued buffeting of a little state by a world power gave the North Vietnamese a powerful propaganda tool. ( McNamara R. . 1996. p. 244 )

In decision. there were plentifulness of grounds why the United states lost in Vietnam. The insurgence war fought was the chief benefit of the Vietnamese. In many occasions the western world power was non able to make the enemy. Although. the American battalions had an advantage in footings of military equipment and figure of soldiers. the Vietnamese managed to compensate the superior US military personnels by the usage of the thick flora and the guerilla tactics. which antecedently worked cleanly against the Gallic forces. Furthermore. the delicate political system of South Vietnam had a important function over the result of the war.

High degrees of corruptness and unstoppable propaganda against the western enemy. by the Viet Cong. complicated more and more the state of affairs for the American war disposal. The fiscal loses of the US had resulted in long term negative economic effects. Due to the fact that the war in Vietnam was broadcasted on the telecasting. the people were able to see the existent face of the struggle. The public support in the US decreased quickly and large-scale anti-war protests influenced the American disposal. To sum up. the Vietnam War was one of the biggest errors in the history of the US. which was based on political prevarications and hapless direction determinations.

Get instant access to
all materials

Become a Member