Utopian Socialists Essay Essay

essay A+

Get Full Essay

Get access to this section to get all the help you need with your essay and educational goals.

Get Access

Robert Owen was one of the laminitiss of socialism ad concerted motion. which in later old ages. Karl Marx had named as Utopian Socialist.

Utopian ideals were derived from the three pillars his idea: ( 1 ) “no one was responsible for his will and his actions because his whole character is formed independently of himself” ; this thought nevertheless. has earned him as a innovator in the publicity of human capital ; ( 2 ) he believed that “all faiths were based on the same absurd imagination” ; and though he did encompass spiritualism at the terminal of his life. still he was one amongst those who opposed faith ; and ( 3 ) he supported the bungalow system. and disliked the mill system.

His first of his pillars of idea. the impression of environmentalism wherein he believed that all worlds are merchandise of the environment and that our human nature could non be changed. has become a basis of all socialist theories. On his 2nd thought. he rejected Christianity and its imposts. and alternatively he relied on the counsel of Reason and Nature. And the tierce of his pillars. Owen revolutionized the mill system. As such he believed that mill system encouraged societal duty. hardhearted individuality and destructive competition.

Contrastingly. he recommended that a field and simple program will incorporate less danger to the society and persons which will promote the hapless to go independent and self-supporting. Further. he instituted the constitution of small towns and communities as a possible manner of relieving poorness. He besides adopted the thought of private ownership and net income motive despite of other humanistic steps that he had. And until his deceasing yearss. he proceeded on forming the working categories in England ( The History Guide ) . Saint-Simon Saint Simon was the laminitis of the Gallic Socialism.

His ideas have greatly influenced the theories of industrialisation and the worlds of industrialism. In contrast to other socialist theoreticians. Saint Simon welcomed industrialisation and capitalist growing. Further he found expertness and endeavor on the evidences of industrialism. One of his thoughts “the Hand of Greed” described the basic greed of the human existences. He believed that in the simplest signifier of society. adult male will ever happen a manner to last. Therefore. he believes that all work forces strive to achieve a higher topographic point in the society’s innate hierarchy.

Therefore. his thought in accomplishing his Utopian socialism. is for the society to extinguish this greed and manner of thought of human existences. The Gallic Revolution became a get downing point of his ideas. when the resistance against destructive liberalism was strong. he advocated for a fresh societal rebellion and made entreaties to the male monarch to convey a new societal order. Furthermore. he found the dangers of uncontrolled individuality. therefore he propagated the thoughts towards an addition in productiveness. organisation. invention. efficiency and technological find.

Though. still he was non self-satisfied plenty to believe that these thoughts are to be achieved in a free market economic system. Further. he was an elitist in nature. While he condemned male monarchs. Lords and clergies as useless and parasitical. he placed the highest of glorification. prestigiousness and authorization towards the technocrats. He believed that male monarchs and Lords merely should function at a necessary and limited function. he distinguished technocrats with the function to take and direct the development of the society ( The History Guide ) .

Charles Fourier was regarded as the “most utopian” amongst all the Utopian Socialists. He was cognizant of all that was go oning in England after the Industrial Revolution. Further. he rejected the thoughts of industrialisation. laissez faire. and the mill system. due to what these can do to the human society. And although he rejected the ideals behind industrialism. he made no actions to rectify the dangers incorporated in industrialism. his lone action against it was to disregard it. But however. he had his ain portion of his philosophical Hagiographas.

His thoughts had told enormous thoughts for the hereafter. His fable of the Four Apples. reflected a certain type of Enlightenment subject. wherein he used ground and nature as the chief dogmas of his Hagiographas. He besides criticized bourgeoisie society for making an “unnatural civilization” . and accordingly added his paradigm for a “non-repressive society” wherein it shall supply an avenue for the look and cultivation of human growing. For he believed. human nature was God-created. and that it must follow that the society should esteem all avenues for human development instead than contending it.

Furthermore. his thought of societal success is come-at-able through concern and cooperation amongst worlds – this besides prompted him to form “phalanxes” which he believed shall nurture cooperation among human. He besides blamed poorness and inequality as the chief perpetrator for upset in the society. therefore conveying into the light the proposal to raise rewards into sufficient degree in order to eliminate poorness. His chief concern was to emancipate all persons through instruction and the release of human passion ( The History Guide ) .

John Stuart Mill’s plants were frequently perceived as plants in contradiction. He was a advocate of authoritative liberalism. utilitarianism and held a Utopian socialist facet. He wrote “utility” as the greatest felicity rule. at which he regarded that actions are proportionally translated into felicity or its contrary consequently. He besides proposed for the hedonic construct of felicity. as he equated it with the absence of hurting. In his discourse of society growing. he consequentially failed to integrate the procedure of human development. but instead extensively focused on his pleasance rule.

Although he considered single autonomy as merely secondary values. he true related the debatable constructs of single autonomy in the class of economic entities. He regarded limitations on trade and production as “evil” restraints. and accordingly. he regarded the plants of free trade as “one sided freedom” . He besides believes that at any point in clip wherein single autonomy clangs with autonomy of economic entity. economic sciences shall ever predominate because it shall ever supply for the greatest sum of felicity.

And though he believes that given the opportunity. the best of human nature shall predominate. still he felt that single autonomy was merely a secondary option and their demands are merely 2nd to be fulfilled. Further. he besides developed an elitist outlook and formed his Utopian construct rooted from his utilitarianism. He explicitly expressed disdain against the multitudes and expressed his uncertainty in the rules of democracy and alternatively suggested the regulation of rational blue bloods ( Galloway. 1996 )

Get instant access to
all materials

Become a Member