Understanding Research Philosophy and its importance Essay

essay B
  • Words: 1856
  • Category: Database

  • Pages: 7

Get Full Essay

Get access to this section to get all the help you need with your essay and educational goals.

Get Access

Many of us believe that ‘research ‘ is ever related to activities that are hidden and largely purely confidential from our cognition and in our day-to-day life ( Altinay and Paraskevas, 2006 ) . In add-on, bulk of us besides believed that these activities are held in research labs, in some facet this is partially right, in a sense that the research done by people in research labs follows certain scientific schemes and methodological analysiss. However, there are besides a turning figure of persons such as concern directors, sellers, faculty members and pupils who at the present clip behavior a thorough research outside research labs in order to develop and bring forth cognition relevant to the concern universe or any peculiar involvement. With this respect, the difference between the research workers are in their research attacks, schemes and doctrines. These differences are “ their perceptual experience of how the cognition can be created and constructed in a strict and meaningful manner in order to reply a research job. ” ( Altinay and Paraskevas 2008:69 ) .

Research doctrine is defined as “ the development of cognition and the nature of cognition ” ( Saunders, et al. , 2009 ) . The significance might sound instead profound, nevertheless, the writer further explained that the basic significance of the definition is exactly the exact thing every research worker is making when he or she is carry oning a research and that is the will to develop cognition in a peculiar field.

Harmonizing to Crossan ( 2003 ) on paper about “ Research Doctrine: Towards and Understanding, ” ( Crossan 2003 ) , there are several grounds on why research workers needs to understand philosophical issues before shiping themselves in a peculiar field. Easterby-Smith, et Al. ( 2002 ) , identifies three grounds on why there is significance on understanding doctrines in mention to research methodological analysis. The first ground the writer added is that by understanding research doctrine the research worker may polish and clear up the research method to be used in their survey and accordingly assist the research workers to garner their grounds and to reply their research inquiries. Second, the cognition of

research doctrine will enable to help the research workers with different types of methodological analysiss and as such avoiding inappropriate and unrelated plants. Last, by understanding the basic significance of research doctrine and understanding its advantages and benefits, it helps the research worker to be more originative and exploratory in their method of research.

Saunders, et Al. ( 2009 ) added, that in research doctrine each research worker follows of import positions on how they perceived the universe. Furthermore, this positions and premises will greatly impact the research scheme and methodological analysis a research worker chooses as portion of its attack.

Research methods can be described and classified into different degrees ( Clark, 1998 ) . In add-on, Saunders, et Al. ( 2009 ) besides pointed out that the degrees of research methods a research worker should follow will incorporate his or her positions about the universe. These positions will really back up the research worker ‘s judgement on which research method the research worker should take as a portion of its scheme ( Saunders, et al. , 2009 ) .

In the societal scientific discipline universe nevertheless, there is an on-going argument to which is the most appropriate point of view from the positions of positivism and the non-positivism/ interpretativism ( Saunders, et al. , 2009 ) .

Harmonizing to Saunders, et Al. ( 2009 ) , if a research worker reflects the doctrine or the positions of positivism, so most likely the research worker will take on the philosophical case of natural scientist. Positivism harmonizing to Veal ( 2006 ) is a model of research similar to the positions and premises adopted by natural scientist, in which the research workers view the people and its behavior as phenomena to be studied, utilizing facts and observations as its scheme to explicate the phenomena.

Saunders, et al. , ( 2009 ) besides added that positivism positions largely prefer working in an discernible societal world and will hold an terminal merchandise research similar to those produced by a natural scientist. Furthermore, research worker with positivism positions will merely detect a phenomenon which is discernible and will stop up bring forthing believable

informations. In add-on, the writer besides argued that one of the indispensable elements of a positive attack is that the positions of the research worker are non influenced on value of opinions.

Interpretivism on the other manus, strongly believes that it is imperative for a research worker to understand the factors and “ differences between worlds in our function as societal histrions ” ( Saunders, et al. , 2009 ) . To clear up, the writer further discussed that these belief is obviously to underscore the difference between carry oning research among people instead than stuffs or object.

Saunders, et Al. ( 2009 ) besides argued that the complexness of the place of interpretivism comes from two rational traditions viz. ; phenomenology and symbolic interactionism. To explicate, the writer identifies phenomenology as mentioning to the manner the human existences make sense to the universe and the surrounding, while the symbolic interactionism, the human being are in the continual procedure of construing the environing societal universe.

In societal universe, Smith ( 1998 ) argued that positivism is most likely the most of import effort in order to hold ‘authoritative cognition. ‘ The writer besides added that the positive attack to societal scientific disciplines is more of a scientific method because a research worker with positivism doctrine will ever presume that everything and every phenomenon can be studied as difficult facts and as such set up scientific Torahs.

Although, for some research workers they believe that it is imperative to utilize the traditional attack of research such as the naturalist or scientific method in order to explicate phenomena or any happening in the physical and life scientific discipline ( Remenyi, et al. , 1998 ) . The writer besides argued that many bookmans nevertheless, have proven a point that this is non wholly appropriate to analyze human existences or the administrations they have created. This point was clearly illustrated on Carr 1967 ( cited in, Remenyi et al. , 1998:94 ) .

“ I do non wish to propose that the intervention of the societal scientist or of the historian can fit that of physical scientist in preciseness, or that their lower status in this regard is due simply to the greater retardation of the

societal scientific disciplines. The Human being is on any position the most complex entity known to us, and the survey of his behavior may good affect differences in sort from those facing the physical scientists. ”

With this respect, many would reason that the survey of phenomenology or sometimes called non-positivism is more appropriate method or scheme in order to analyze people ‘s behavior and their administration ( Remenyi, et Al, 1998 ) . The writer further argued that research workers that has phenomenological positions does non deny the importance and relevancy of positivism in the survey of physical life and scientific disciplines, after all, if non because of positivism there will be no enlightenment to the development stuff world of the twentieth-century, such as bosom graft and infinite travels. However, despite the importance of the positivism positions, they have hapless penetrations when explicating, why people hate their occupations and most of the clip complains about everything, why client service is usually hapless, or why is it that most of employees are motivated with accomplishment and some are non ( Remenyi, et al. , 1998 ) .

Research Approach

Harmonizing to Saunders, et Al. ( 2009 ) research attacks are chiefly based on the research doctrines, whereby the deductive attack is normally used by research workers with traditional natural scientific positions ( positivism ) , while inductive attack is normally based on phenomenology ( interpretivism ) . Sometimes these research paradigms or attacks are used together in research to explicate better an happening or phenomena ( Gilner, et al. , 20000 ) . Furthermore, a deductive attack is an highly influential and rational attack, in which conceptual and theoretical model is developed and tested utilizing empirical observation ( Hussey and Hussey, 1997 ) . An inductive research on the other manus is an attack whereby, the theory is developed from detecting an empirical world, which is typically oppose the deductive method ( Hussey and Hussey,1997 ) .

Research Schemes

“ Choosing an appropriate research scheme is cardinal to guaranting that research inquiries are addressed in a manner which has value and is congruous with the overall subject, inquiries and intent of research ” ( Palliative Medicine 2004 ; 18:677-684 ) .In relation to, Saunders, et Al. ( 2009 ) added that most of the research strategies belongs to deductive attack. The writer besides argued that even it is imperative to apportion schemes, it is of import to retrieve that there is no superior or inferior type of scheme, all schemes are of import to every research worker ; nevertheless, their usage will wholly depend on the field of survey the research worker will ship on.

Harmonizing to Robson ( 1993 ) there are three traditional research schemes, viz. ; Experiment, Survey and Case Studies. However, Saunders, et al. , ( 2009 ) added that research schemes should non be restricted on one scheme per survey ; it is besides possible that study scheme can be as portion of instance survey.

Apart from the relation of experiment to natural and societal scientific disciplines, Saunders, et Al. ( 2009 ) besides defines experiment as, the survey of insouciant links between an independent and dependent variable. Therefore, experiments are normally use as a footing of explanatory research in replying the inquiries ‘how ‘ and ‘why ‘ .

Survey is a popular scheme in carry oning a research, as it allows a big sum aggregation of informations from a chosen sample ( Saunders, et al. , 2009 ) . Additionally, the writer besides pointed out that study is indispensable in the aggregation of quantitative informations whereby the research worker can analyze the informations quantitatively by utilizing illative statistics.

The last on the tradition research schemes harmonizing to Saunders, et Al. ( 2009 ) , is the instance survey ; the writer identifies this research method as normally used in societal scientific disciplines in order to hold a more in-depth survey of a peculiar person or a group for that affair.

Approach for this Survey

In the past, many bookmans and research workers considered positivism as the right scientific paradigm to the survey of selling ( Carson, et al. , 2001 ) . This statement

has besides been supported by European Journal of Marketing, 28 ( 3 ) 1994, whereby the writer suggested that the research workers needs to rethink the selling research methods and reply inquiries such as, “ why do qualitative surveies lack of credence in selling? ” ( Hunt,1994:13-25 ) .

Harmonizing to ( Carson, et al. , 2001 ) , after the aggressive and long clip argument about the relevancy of the attacks of scientific theories on the selling survey ( see for illustration the European Journal of Marketing, 28 ( 3 ) 1994 ) , the writer considers the qualitative research method in the position of selling as a suited research attack for this survey. In add-on, Carson, et Al. ( 2001 ) besides discussed that interpretivsim is more suited in the survey of selling as its attack to is in a more personal degree in replying the jobs in societal field such as understanding the world. Furthermore, the writer besides identified its place to marketing research as skewed toward interpretative terminal of the spectrum.

( See figure 1 )

Figure 1. The writers place to selling research

( Adapted from Carson, et Al. ( 2009:14 )

In footings or research scheme, Bonoma ( 1985 ) argued that instance survey is a popular method amongst many sellers. In add-on, the writer defines instance survey as a well-suited attack to selling, furthermore, the form of instance survey scheme in the field of selling is extremely recognise as agencies to bring forth explorative penetrations.

Get instant access to
all materials

Become a Member