The term of globalization
What is Globalization? Discuss with mention to the European Union
During the 1980s and 1900s sociologist became highly interested in globalisations consequence on society. Since sociologist captivation in this procedure has merely increased. As Anthony Gidden ‘s says ‘thirty old ages ago, the term globalisation was comparatively unknown, but today it seems to be on the tip of everyone ‘s lingua ‘ ( 2009: 127 ) . This is because globalisation is seen as a immense societal phenomenon which affects all facets of human life. One of the chief happenings or responses of globalisation could be seen to be the outgrowth of the European Union in 1973. The creative activity of this association led Europe to go a ‘Europe without frontiers ‘ . This was done through the creative activity of a individual market, where goods, services, people and money could be moved between European states freely. Most argue that the creative activity of the European Union has had a great consequence on the kineticss of states within Europe while others are of the position that it is nil more than an international organic structure, like the United Nations. This essay will analyze the term of globalisation and its effects upon Europe. Additionally it will discourse whether Europe was merely a inactive receiver of globalisation. Research by sociologists like Anthony Giddens, Ronald Robertson and Patrick Le Gal & A ; egrave ; s will help in replying these inquiries.
Anthony Giddens defined Globalization as ‘the fact that we are all progressively live in one universe, so that persons, groups and states become of all time more mutualist ‘ ( 2009:126 ) . This is a definition that most would hold on. The procedure of Globalization means that we are now populating in a smaller and better connected universe due to the creative activity of things like the cyberspace and mass production. Beck farther defines the term globalisation by stating ‘Globalization means that boundary lines become markedly less relevant to everyday behavior in the assorted dimensions of economic sciences, information, ecology, engineering, cross-cultural struggle and civil society. It points something non understood and difficult to understand yet at the same clip familiar, which is altering mundane life with considerable force and obliging everyone to accommodate and react in assorted ways ‘ ( 2005:20 ) . Here he is foregrounding that globalisation effects all countries of society. Robertson takes a somewhat different stance on specifying the term globalisation and argues that it ‘refers non to the compaction of the universe and the intensification of the consciousness of the universe as a whole ‘ ( Robertson 1992:8 ) . Robertson negotiations about the construct of ‘unicity ‘ in relation to globalisation to explicate what he means. He states that due to Globalization the universe in now one remarkable topographic point. In this ‘unicity ‘ he argues that all states are ‘orientated to the planetary ‘ and that each 1 has a ‘particular history of the planetary order ‘ ( Kiely and Marfleet 1998:189 ) .
Ronald Robertson farther argues in his book entitled Globalization: Social Theory and Global Culture, that there were five cardinal phases to Globalization in Europe. He entitled the first stage the ‘germinal ‘ stage. He said that this ran from the mid-15th century when thoughts about national communities foremost began to emerge. The following phase was the ‘incipient ‘ stage in the late nineteenth century where these thoughts from the ‘germinal stage ‘ became world and international dealingss began. The ‘take-off ‘ stage ran from the 1870s boulder clay 1920s and was harmonizing to Robertson the most of import stage. This was when the modern-day universe was to the full created and there was a growing of many international links. Events such as the Second World War and creative activity of the atomic bomb which occurred from 1920 to 1965 were classed under the ‘struggle for hegemony ‘ stage. The concluding phase that Robertson labelled was that of the ‘uncertainty ‘ stage which began in the sixtiess. During this stage capitalist economy prevailed as the individual signifier of Globalization procedure. ( Robertson, 1992:58-59 )
There is a acute argument among sociologist as to whether globalisation has had a positive or negative consequence upon societies. Held et Al divided these sociologists into three chief sentiment groups, ‘hyperglobalizers ‘ , ‘sceptics ‘ and ‘transformationalist ‘ . ‘Hyperglobalizers ‘ like Albrow view capitalist economy as being the chief drive force of Globalization and predicted that globalisation would do the terminal of the nation-state. ‘Sceptics ‘ oppose this position and alternatively see authoritiess and markets as the drive force behind globalisation. Additionally they see the universe as being a batch less of an independent topographic point than the 1890s. ‘Transformationalists ‘ such as Rosenau think that the chief cause of globalisation was the corporate forces of modernness. Additionally they argue that globalisation is transforming universe political relations. ( Held et al. 1999:10 )
Globalization has affected the European Union in many ways and across a big range. Globalization can be seen to impact everything from the merchandises that a European Citizen can buy in their local supermarket right up to the political running of full states. However there is an ongoing statement as to whether Europe has been a inactive receiver of Globalization or whether it has shaped the procedure of Globalization. Rumford argues that globalisation has provided Europe with the chances it has needed to spread out. He looks to the economic system and says, ‘Globalization presents the EU and its member provinces with both the motivation and the chance to heighten fight ‘ ( Rumford 2002:19-20 ) . This is an illustration of Europe determining the procedure of globalisation to profit itself.
Whether Europe was a inactive receiver of globalisation or non, it is still clear that globalisation has had a great consequence on the continent. Economic, societal, political and cultural alterations have occurred as a consequence of Europeanization.
Amin and Thrift note that effects of globalisation on the European economic system can be dated back to the early seventiess. They go on to reason that seven cardinal alterations have occurred within the economic system due to globalisation. First, they argue that there has been a immense centralization of the fiscal construction of Europe. The debut of the Euro currency on the 1st January 2002 by 15 member provinces of the European Union is a clear representation of this. Second they declare that cognition had become an increasing driving force of the economic system. They point out that jointly European states were sing instruction as progressively of import in the fiscal universe and that cognition was progressively being shared among states. The transnationalization of engineering was another alteration that they noted. Technology allowed states to pass on much more easy. Fourthly, they said that there was a rise in ‘global oligopolies ‘ ( 1995:4 ) . Companies were holding to travel planetary in really early phases of concern to maintain up. Economic determinations besides have changed due to globalisation. Governments and concerns are now dickering with one another globally. The 5th alteration to the economic system was to make with civilization. They argue that the globalized economic system has lead to the homogenisation of many states through the merchandises that are available. Last they saw how the economic system lead to the dislocation of boundary lines within Europe. This has chiefly been done through the creative activity of a free market, where goods, services and people can be freely circulated among states.
Some sociologists argue that Europe actively used globalisation to profit its economic system.
Held et Al saw the bonding of multiply economic systems as an active effort by Europe to contend laterality from immense economic systems such as the USA and Japan. Castell farther said that Europe had made the determination to created ‘a legalizing individuality ‘ ( 1997:8 ) within the planetary economic system.
The debut of the multi-national Euro currency is seen in a negative visible radiation by many. They worry that states will lose a critical portion of their national individuality. Mark Pittaway uses the illustration of the Maastricht Treaty of 1992 where there was a referendum on the creative activity of a single-currency, to exemplify this hesitancy by many over an inter-national currency.
Europeanisation has besides caused increasing anxiousness within the labour market. The prostration of boundary lines has meant that many states are enduring from a great inflow of cheaper, immigrant workers. Micklethwait and Woodbridge observed that ‘for an increasing figure of workers… it means the possibility that person who lives half the universe off will dump you on the dole ‘ ( 1999: 440 ) . So while the globalisation of the Economy in Europe may hold benefit persons in less developed states, it has taken away chances for those in the more developed 1s.
Globalization in Europe has un-doubtable had an consequence on the function of the nation-states within it. However sociologists can non hold on whether Globalization in Europe has weakened them or made them stronger. Albrow is of the position that the nation-state has non been wholly wiped out by globalisation. Alternatively he argues it still holds a really powerful place within planetary webs. Held et Al on the other manus see a great nexus between the death of the nation-state and globalisation. Patrick Le Gal & A ; egrave ; s in his essay A New Phase of the State Story in Europe lineations seven ways in which globalisation has weakened the nation-state within Europe. First he says that nation-states legal powers have been weakened. This he argues can be seen through the increasing usage of international understandings as beginnings of jurisprudence. Taxation harmonizing to Le Gal & A ; egrave ; s is cardinal to the nation-state and the decrease of its ability to demand revenue enhancements has decreased its disbursement powers greatly. Additionally globalisation has caused a alteration in the running of the province. Globalization has caused the province to go disconnected as everything has to be negotiated with the European Union and there are no longer direct determinations. Many argue that nation-states have wholly lost their military independency. While this may make a more stable Europe, many resent the loss of national military independency. Globalization has besides caused the prostration of frontiers environing nation-states. Le Gal & A ; egrave ; s gave the Schengen zone understanding as an illustration. This understanding was signed by 10 European provinces in 1985 and allowed the free circulation of persons within them. This has had obvious effects on the cultural individuality of nation-states, due to the sudden inflow of immigrants. Finally Le Gal & A ; egrave ; s looked at how the globalized economic system weakened the nation-state. He said that over the past 30 old ages the thought of a national economic system had been undermined with the debut of multi-national currencies like the euro.
Many authors are concerned that Globalization in Europe has taken away single ‘s state ‘s sense of cultural individuality. This is through alterations like the relaxation of boundary line controls and the debut of the Euro as a multi-national currency. Albrow argued that Europeanization was doing the prostration of vicinity ; he said ‘what used to be connected is frequently disconnected. Peoples are separated by main roads where one time there were Fieldss and small town streets. Neighbours no longer come from the same category or even state. One coevals fails to understand another ‘s music. Night is divided from twenty-four hours by danger on the street. This is day-to-day experience of life in a vicinity ‘ ( Albrow 1996:110 ) . He argued that globalisation had changed the function of vicinity due to people being able to fall in assorted groups and communities which have no connexion to their vicinity. He called this withdrawal of individualities from groups the “ relativization of individuality ” .
But other authors such as Robertson argue the opposite and say that globalisation in Europe has really benefitted local communities and their individualities, merely in a different manner. He makes claim that there is a new global-local relationship occurring, which he calls the procedure of ‘glocalisation ‘ . He says that the local is now globally produced, ‘much of the publicity of vicinity is in fact done from above or outside ‘ ( 1995 ) . A high profile illustration of this global-local relationship is that of the eating house concatenation McDonalds. Despite being a high-profile planetary company, their bill of fares vary in different locations to accommodate their client ‘s cultural demands. For illustration in India their ironss do non function beef or porc out of spiritual regard. This illustration highlights how despite being in an age of globalisation, local imposts and traditions are still of import.
Castell farther adds to the statement that globalisation has created stronger local individualities within Europe by indicating out that there has been a rise in nationalist motions in many European states. ‘Thus, confronted with a diminution in democracy and citizen engagement, at a clip of globalisation of the economic system and Europeanization of political relations, citizens retrench in their states, and progressively confirm their states ‘ ( Castells 2000b: 359 ) . An illustration of this increased patriotism would be the rise in popularity of the British National Party in recent old ages. This rise in popularity can chiefly be seen as a response to factors like the addition of unemployment among British citizens due to European immigrants taking the work.
Beck in What is Globalization? puts frontward the position that Europe is in fact non every bit incorporate as we think and that state provinces are still really separately distinguishable. An illustration he gives is that there is ‘no existent European newspaper ‘ . He farther says that the single-market that is in being in Europe has in fact promoted ‘petty and provincial ‘ ( 2005:157 ) . Beck is stating that Europeanization has non created as such an integrated brotherhood as people like to believe.
To sum up globalisation has clearly had a major consequence on the universe and its effects can be particularly seen in the European Union. These effects vary from economic 1s to effects on the national individuality of states. In decision it appears as though Europeanization has had overall a positive consequence on Europe. Aspects such as the opening up of markets has benefitted many through supplying more chances and making better cultural apprehension among different states. However there are undeniable some negative facet to globalisation in Europe. Mass unemployment in some European states due to an inflow of much cheaper immigrant workers would be an illustration. Where or non globalisation is holding a positive consequence on Europe, it is undisputedly go oning to determine it.
- Albrow, M. ( 1996 ) The Global Age: State & A ; Society Beyond Modernity, Cambridge: Civil order Imperativeness
- Amin, A & A ; Thrift, N. ( 1994 ) Globalization, Institutions, and Regional Development in Europe, Oxford University Press
- Beck, U. ( 2005 ) What is Globalization, Cambridge: Civil order Imperativeness
- Castells, M. ( 1997 ) The Power of Identity, Oxford: Blackwell
- ( 2000 ) End of Millennium: Volume III, Oxford: Blackwell
- Giddens. A ( 2009 ) Sociology, Polity Press
- Held, D et Al. ( 1999 ) Global Transformations: Politicss, Economicss and Culture, Cambridge: Civil order Imperativeness
- Janoski, T. ( 2005 ) The Handbook of Political Sociology, Cambridge University Press
- Kiely, R & A ; Marfleet, P ( 1998 ) Globalization and the Third World, Routledge
- Lechner, F. ( 2001 ) Accessed on 26/10/09. Available at hypertext transfer protocol: //www.sociology.emory.edu/globalization/debates.html.
- Nash, K. & A ; Scott, A ( 2004 ) The Blackwell comrade to political sociology, Blackwell
- Pittaway, M. ( 2003 ) Globalization and Europe, The Open University
- Robertson, R. ( 1992 ) Globalization: Social Theory and Global Culture, London: Sage
- ( 1995 ) ‘Glocalization: Time-Space and Homogeneity- Hetregeneity ‘ in M. Featherstone, S. Lash and R. Robertson ( explosive detection systems ) , Global Modernities, London: Sage
- Rumford, C. ( 2002 ) The European Union: a political sociology, Blackwell Publishing