The Role of the Media Essay Essay

essay A

Get Full Essay

Get access to this section to get all the help you need with your essay and educational goals.

Get Access

The politicians non without good ground see the mass media to be the basic instrument in airing of political orientation. Therefore. apparently. the media so frequently has been found themselves in the centre of het public arguments and non seldom were being charged with arousing societal. political and war struggles. War propaganda is possibly every bit old as war itself. though in recent old ages means for its airing have been perfected with the same mastermind that has improved and made more lifelessly the implements of war.

In ancient times war propaganda was spread by word of oral cavity ; today all the resources of a extremely mechanised civilisation are mobilized to rock the public head. The function of media in disposing required public sentiment can be barely overestimated. particularly during wartime when the mission of the media lies in converting the populace in properness and inevitableness to impose war to achieve the certain ends of the province. In this paper we will see the function of the media in determinations to travel to war by the illustrations of Spanish–American War of 1898 and recent War in Iraq.

To recognize the topographic point of the media among driving forces of these two wars we should size up facets of war propaganda in both instances. uncover the analogues and differences between them. and do the decision. During wartime the political and military leaders can be expected to lead on the enemy and the populace. Not every bit good understood is the function of the mass media. Although sometimes accused of helping the enemy or going advocators. the media really assist governments in a assortment of ways. including maintaining them informed and conveying their propaganda and disinformation.

The mass media can be an ally in doing war and even can do armed struggle appear entertaining ( Smith. 1999 ) . Sing the portion played by the media in two war struggles distant in clip for more than a century from each other we meet the apparent analogy in widespread preparation by the media of the nature of war. In both instances it was presented by the imperativeness as the war of freedom: the Spanish–American War was positioned by the media as a battle for Cuba’s “freedom from Spanish rule” ( Wilkerson. 1932. p. 31 ) . and one of the mottos under which the War in Iraq was initiated – to emancipate Iraqis from oppressive government of Saddam Hussein ( “Why You Should Oppose” . 2002 ) . Unrestricted intelligence coverage helps to guarantee that the armed struggle conforms to international jurisprudence. and to the political and psychological dimensions of national defence. As military public personal businesss analyst Harry Noyes has pointed out. states do non merely fight in wars. they besides “must take sound diplomatic. economic. societal and cultural steps and pass on them well” .

He has argued that the military and the media need each other. and that imperativeness histories are every bit much a portion of war as the arms. because winning in the conflict of public sentiment requires that combat be “credibly communicated to the world” ( qtd. in Smith. 1999. p. 222 ) . In the visible radiation of Noyes’ words we can see public presentation of this undertaking by the media before and during wartime – to fix and organize public sentiment induction and behavior of war – as being successful for both wars concerned.

Therefore. in treatments of the causes of the Spanish-American War. historiographers have made merely go throughing mention to the influence of the ‘yellow journals’ . To province simply that these diaries were active in behalf of the Cuban Rebels is to observe merely a portion of their part to induction of war. Their influence was much more far-reaching than appears on the surface. for their activity in working the Cuban rebellion and in selling their intelligence services to other newspapers made it possible for all parts of the state to acquire partizan histories of the Cuban rebellion ( Wilkerson. 1932 ) .

Similarly. in the instance of War in Iraq the American mass media accustomed the public sentiment to the idea that Iraq develops and manufactures arms of mass devastation which entitles the US to impose war on this state being potentially endangering to international security ( Anderson. 2004 ) . Although the President and military may hold to command district on a map. they should non hold the power to repress the kingdom of idea. Journalists who rely excessively much on official beginnings and underproduce critical information have to portion the incrimination for the nation’s bloopers ( Smith. 1999 ) . It was true for both our instances.

Therefore. for the Spanish–American War the Maine catastrophe may be said to hold been the immediate cause of the war with Spain. For about three old ages sensational newspapers had campaigned smartly for the cause of the Rebels. but prior to the Maine explosion their intelligence. though eliciting understanding for the Cubans. was missing in those elements necessary to crystallise American sentiment in favour of war with Spain. For some clip a big portion of the American populace had indicated their resistance to Spain. but the flicker needed to detonate their repressed feelings against Spanish ‘oppression’ had failed to happen.

This flicker was furnished in the Maine catastrophe. The enigma environing the calamity and the intuition of Spanish perfidy furnished the footing for many rumours and guesss as to the cause of the detonation. which were used to advantage by several newspapers in inflaming the heads of the people ( Wilkerson. 1932 ) . It was proved subsequently that the Spanish were non guilty of the Maine detonation. and the mass media bear duty for feeding disinformation.

Similarly. for the War in Iraq the information about possessing arms of obliteration by Iraq. widely disseminated by the media. subsequently turned out to be unconfirmed. The imperativeness is the watchdog over establishments of power. its occupation is to inform the people about the behaviors of their establishments ( Trainor. 1990 ) . and from the point of view of this mission Wright ( 1965 ) noted that the objects of war propaganda are ever the same regardless of era: the fusion of the battler. the disunion of the enemy and achieving the good will of neutrals.

It is obvious that in both concerned instances the media successfully realized their mission. The bookmans emphasized that the media and the military power influence each other “not in conformity with any ‘master plan’ but instead as their diverse and sometimes contradictory actions influence the perceptual experiences of the persons who combine to do up ‘the military’ and ‘the media’” ( Eccles. 1979. p. 150 ) . The military–media relationship is symbiotic. The media need to see the action while the military demand for them to see it. because conflict is meaningless until it is believably communicated to the universe ( Trainor. 1990 ) .

In coverage of military operations the media used different agencies to execute this communicating. While letter writers covering events of the Spanish–American War used merely telegraph wire. the modern media have complete set of technological agencies to present intelligence to the bulk of people all around the universe – Internet. autotype. cellular communicating etc. hence. the covering of the Spanish–American war can be barely comparable with that of recent War in Iraq. This reflected besides on consciousness of the populace with causes. intents and behavior of war. The media have changed the face of modern warfare.

Revolutionary technological progresss in the last two decennaries provide an instantaneous airing of the intelligence ( Gervais. 1998 ) . and during War in Iraq the American media used all these modern developments to have powerful endorsing from the populace. While the letter writers in the Spanish–American War faced troubles in assemblage of intelligence in Cuba due to controversy between the newspapers and Spanish governments over the rights of letter writers ( Wilkerson. 1932 ) . the legion media accredited in Iraq have carte blanche to roll up and convey intelligence.

The important point in the latter instance was the menace for the letter writers to be killed or kidnapped. but such menace is a world in any war. There is one more difference in the media’s coverage of two concerned war struggles. While the coverage for the Spanish–American War was bit by bit increasing up to the minute of the Main detonation ( Wilkerson. 1932 ) that of the U. S. -Iraqi struggle prior to the war was debatable in two ways.

First. few newspapers and even fewer intelligence broadcasts offered diverse positions on the war. and. second. both newspapers and telecasting intelligence broadcasts were dominated by the voices of Americans. peculiarly American politicians and military functionaries. without hearings from the other side of the struggle ( Leahey. 2004 ) . Sum uping the grounds from two war struggles affecting the American mass media it is sensible to state that whatever the era be the media play significant function in organizing public sentiment and fixing it to endorse governmental determinations to travel to war.

Furthermore. the media themselves bring both the governments and the public to such determinations. As Gervais ( 1998 ) justly noted in the instance of military–media dealingss. history is bound to reiterate itself. We revealed that during both the Spanish–American War and the War in Iraq the American media succeeded in intensifying the public’s outrage towards the actions of Spain in the first instance and those of Iraq in another instance which prepared supportive public sentiment to impose the war.

Although the coverage of the recent War in Iraq was more comprehensive due to modern agencies of communicating that of the Spanish–American War was more balanced and systematic. Although the war-mongering imperativeness demonstrated its great power over the public head when the different media work together in furthering international hatred and distrust. hopefully. the same manner. the united attempts of an enlightened imperativeness would turn out enormously effectual in making the conditions of universe peace and a better apprehension among the states at all times.

Get instant access to
all materials

Become a Member