The Conflict Of World Wide Racism Sociology Essay Essay

essay B

Get Full Essay

Get access to this section to get all the help you need with your essay and educational goals.

Get Access

Racism is one cause of struggle the universe over. In order to seek to restrict the negative effects of racism the affair must be addressed with the grownups of tomorrow. As the UK continues to go one of the most widely distributed planetary societies a more multicultural position of race must certainly be adopted for a harmonious society to boom. The purpose of this literary reappraisal is to critically analyze certification environing the rating of immature kids on the subject of racism. It has been claimed that, ‘child morality throws visible radiation on grownup morality. If we want to organize work forces and adult females, nil will suit us so will for the undertaking as to analyze the Torahs that govern their formation. ‘ ( Jean Piaget, The Moral Judgment of the Child. )


Before traveling any farther it is of import to specify what Racism really is. The word itself has assorted intensions and therefore a individual definition is difficult to get at. It would be just to propose that the bulk of the definitions point to the societal high quality of some persons over other groups of people due to unalterable factors such as race, civilization or ethnicity. John Rex ( 1986 ) described his described his theory of racism saying, ‘It does n’t truly count whether this is because of work forces ‘s cistrons, because of the history to which their ascendants have been exposed, because of the nature of their civilization or because of Godhead edict. Whichever is the instance it might be argued that this adult male is an Ten and that, being an Ten, he is bound to hold peculiar unwanted qualities. ‘ He besides differentiates between racism and racism, which he describes as ‘unequal intervention of assorted racial groups. ‘ while racism is a ‘belief about a racial group ‘ . It is the Rex thought of racism which leads to the formation of bias and finally leads to favoritism. ( All cited from Haralambos p169 )

With these definitions in head it would look that Racialism is to keep person in disdain due to their credo, coloring material or cultural background while to racism is more of a lived experience. The earliest division of society through race was the scientific classification of people within the Caucasoid, Mongoloid and Negroid divisions. The obvious differences in the groups could non be ignored although this corporate nomenclature has become less popular through the old ages and is considered a more racialist point of view. Scientific differences in the classs have been used by extremists throughout history to back up ideals of the high quality of one group over another with Nazism being a premier illustration.


The thought that racism is an experience that an person may populate through is proposed by Albert Memmi ( 2000 ) . It must be the instance for many kids that their experiences of racism are first manus and that they are on the having terminal of person else ‘s racist positions. While the Early Years Foundation Stage ( 2007 ) course of study looks to turn to proviso for equality and equal chances it has to be the instance that some kids ‘s earliest familiarity with racism is at school. Memmi would recommend that every clip a human being meets an person or group of people who is different or non understood that it would be the natural reaction to organize, could be conceived as, a racist sentiment. His sociological research has looked into contradicting impressions of racial bias and understanding how they are formed with a position to antagonizing racism. This is a impression which is reflected in the EYFS who guarantee that suppliers of early kid attention should hold positive attitudes towards diverseness and difference in order that the kids should value diverseness. Memmi, unlike some other societal scientists ( call some ) does non back up the angle which suggests that everybody has racist positions nevertheless he does admit that ‘racism is the most normally shared thing in the universe ‘ ( p129 ) and goes on to province that irrespective of race, ethnicity or faith the potency for racism exists in all societal groups. Evidence would propose that racism is a natural happening and although grouping occurs as portion of the developmental curve it does non ever have to take to the formation of bias ( Memmi ) . While scientific grouping has been partly accredited to the promotion of the Social Darwinsim theory the theory itself was recently applied to race.

Memmi and Piaget are both of the sentiment that racism is a subject which, if addressed at an early adequate phase in a kid ‘s development, can be taught and to a point controlled so that as the kid becomes a immature grownup it will hold a broad apprehension of diverseness and will be able to lend positively to society. These positions are besides mirrored in the EYFS. The denial of obvious racial differences would be naA?ve and recognition of them is non racist and supports the childhood developmental norm of grouping to heighten cognitive development. Piaget ‘s cognitive development theory leads us to believe that kids, during the preoperational phase, do label things in one time they have experience of them and will so it follows that kids will group people harmonizing to the coloring material of their tegument. The theory would besides province that kids are non able to earnestly understand the deductions of cultural grouping during the early, egoistic phases of development. This ‘colour sightlessness ‘ has been viewed by some as a progressive manner to counter the growing of racism within kids.

But how do kids go racialist? It has been acknowledged that a big portion of the development of a kid is taken up with developing one ‘s ain individuality. If this is the instance so it is imaginable that a kid can non organize bias against others as they are egoistic. Not the instance harmonizing to ausdale & A ; feagin, the 1st R. The premise that kids are incognizant of racial difference and that they do non split society into cultural groups has been referred to as ‘colour sightlessness ‘ nevertheless Derman-Sparks et al carried out research which drew the decision that ‘children are really much aware of racial differences ‘ and even went every bit far as to province that ‘many are besides cognizant of racism ‘ . Their paper inquiries kids from a battalion of cultural backgrounds, all of them within Piaget ‘s preoperational phase and the findings highlight the different position points of race posed by kids from oppressed racial or cultural backgrounds to those held by white kids. The research reflects the Memmi proposal that racism is a lived experience. Children from a ‘third universe ‘ background asked inquiries about Whites and racism while white kids showed involvement in people of coloring material nevertheless their remarks reflected stereotypes and, in some, a negative attitude. This consequence conflicts Piaget ( 1932 ) and Kohlberg ( 1969 ) who both import that kids below the age of seven do non hold the cognitive development to blossom the societal and moral concluding behind their groupings. As a consequence the kids are non exposing the impression of high quality necessary to go classed as racialist. The work of Denman-Sparks highlighted the early marks of grouping although it is difficult to estimate how dependable their findings were. When seeking to estimate the kids ‘s behavior as the presence of a research worker has been proven to alter a kid ‘s reaction ( Agar, 1980 ; Murphy 1985 ) ( How immature kids perceive race p17 ) . It has been recognised that the sort of inquiries asked can change the type of reply received. Where kids have been asked specifically about an single the replies received contain properties of the individual in inquiry. Questions about groups frequently get replies loaded more by ethnicity. ( Holmes ( How immature kids perceive race p18 ) .

If the Law in the UK would non do kids accountable for their actions in a condemnable sense so it would stand to ground that, by the same logic, kids could non be accountable for any racialist positions which they may express.


While many have researched the subject of racism amongst kids at that place seems to be small, if anything, written to propose that research workers have struggled to garner informations due to barriers created by their ain cultural background and unfavorable judgment persists on the dependability of informations which has been harvested by grownups. It would be interesting, hence, to collate responses on and around the subject of race from kids if the information appeared to be collected by a kid. It has been proved that kids do non move usually when there is an grownup in the room whether a bond exists or non. If a kid could be primed to inquire inquiries on the subject or possibly even observations carried out on kids in their familiar milieus when confronted with racial or cultural differences whether reactions would be different. This is unfavorable judgment which has been levelled at Piaget among others by Van Ausedale ( p7 ) who has besides inquiry whether, finally, Piaget ‘s cognitive development theory can be applied to kids ‘s apprehension of racial/ethnic difference.

Get instant access to
all materials

Become a Member