Role Of An Analytical Framework Sociology Essay Essay

essay B

Get Full Essay

Get access to this section to get all the help you need with your essay and educational goals.

Get Access

Before I begin on my analytical reappraisal of the selected article, I foremost, feel that it is important to sketch and specify what an analytical model is and what it consists of. Due to the nature of the topic we are measuring, that being ‘social scientific discipline ‘ , it is clear that research workers have to postulate with many different variables from different theoretical point of views to the huge differing ideological paradigms of this topic. If a survey does non possess a proposed analytical model within its chief organic structure of authorship, it will frequently be criticised for being excessively descriptive and missing a precise probe, therefore intending the academic work will miss clear focal point and suffer from being obscure.

Second, analytical models are many and varied, some utilise discernible world within society from establishments such as household, instruction and the province. These are ideal if the research worker intends on garnering grounds from that peculiar establishment, leting the research worker test their hypothesis of Y affects X etc. However many analytical models within the societal scientific disciplines are normally intertwined to identify rational theories ; these include countries such as Marxism, Rational pick and Network theory. Research workers utilizing these types of model allow for a focussed papers, which adopts a peculiar rational theory and consistently evaluates it to the chosen subject country from that point of view.

All analytical models do portion one peculiar tendency whether it is measuring political orientations or the assorted establishments, their first initial undertaking is to call up the rational attack through the organic structure of literature. Furthermore this analytical model must be chosen with careful consideration by faculty members, as within their chosen model at that place will dwell of theoreticians who portion similar positions on that peculiar issue. E.g. Rational pick theoreticians believe that we make picks based upon our personal penchant, holding theoreticians back up your statement increases cogency and strengthens construction of your statement, therefore leting you to raise peculiar inquiries such as ‘is there reason of extremist Islam? ‘ In short these models consist of a set of rational tools that guide the research worker through his/her research for illustration, how to roll up, kind, and construe the consequences found, evidently steering is non the lone application within the theoretical model but it besides has close links with the peculiar sub-questions asked within that theory.

First, an of import item to cite about the peculiar article, is the rubric of the article itself ‘The Rationality of Radical Islam ‘ this shows a clear indicant of the writers analytical point of view The usage of ‘Rationality ‘ within the rubric suggests that Wiktoro & A ; Kaltenhaler are taking a Rational Choice position attack within the article. Before I begin on researching how Wiktoros has employed this rational pick theory to terrorist act, it is of import to turn to what rational pick theory truly is and its premises.

Throughout much of the western hemisphere in the early portion of the twenty-first century, we have witnessed a displacement in the manner we analyse human behavior. This displacement was at big partially due to the outgrowth of RCT which has been dominant within economic sciences but has spread to other subjects. This Rational pick theory consists of three independent theories at its nucleus including ‘social pick theory, game theory and economic sciences. Basically RCT is really three things at the same clip, because non merely does it possess a logical construction to which many usage it as a cardinal political orientation to speculating. But it is both a normative & A ; empirical method of probe into the actions and behaviors of the person.

RCTs primary implicit in focal point begins with the clear recognition of the person, non the interaction between several persons. RCT would therefore recommend a minimalist province which is merely used for continuing single autonomies and non invasive on the person. Furthermore RCT is besides concerned with the account of all societal phenomenons within society whether it be conforming, or aberrant Acts of the Apostless, it views worlds as ‘rational animals ‘ significance there are deliberate mental procedure that exist within our picks. Because rational pick is derived from economic sciences it acknowledges all societal exchanges are like that of economic exchanges to which ‘an histrion will take an action rationally, based on a hierarchy of penchants, that promises to maximise benefits and minimise costs ‘ ( Zey 1998 p.2 ) these basic premises of worlds, portray that our determinations are reared towards the exclusive purpose of net income or pleasance.

This article explores the ‘The Rationality of Radical Islam ‘ it specifically asks the inquiry ‘Why do Islamist groups engage in high-cost/risk activism ‘ ( Wiktorowicz 2006 p.296 ) and the inducements behind it. This peculiar analytical model is perfect to utilize as, terrorist act throughout the general population is widely considered extremely irrational, particularly in the instance of Jihadist terrorist act, as how can you give yourself and others for a greater good? The grounds many see terrorists and their sympathisers as irrational is due to that their beliefs are so unlikely and dogmatic, ( Wiktorowicz, cited 2004 in Caplan, 2006 p.97 ) and what factual grounds do Jihadist terrorists have for deriving a topographic point directly into Eden where they can bask the company of 72 virgins? We foresee this ‘certain ‘ attack as being nil more than obviously foolish, due to the dependence on belief. However Wiktrorowicz believes that we can non judge an action such as this, as irrational merely because we do n’t hold with it, and if the person is optimising their top penchant so they are moving rationally ( Wiktorowicz 2006 p.300 ) .

The 2nd major point tackled by these two writers, is the appraisal on the assorted inducements terrorist administrations offer, as all groups ‘proffers its political orientation as an efficient way to redemption, which serves as a heuristic device for in-doctrinal histrions to weigh the costs & A ; benefits of certain behavior ‘ ( Wiktorowicz 2006 p.301 ) . In other words most administrations do n’t offer ‘material or worldly goods ‘ which by western civilization does non reflect economic or personal benefit for the person, but it shows that religious good are more of import to some. But there is grounds that those who joined Algeria ‘s armed Islamic groups chose to make so to profit economically from insurgence, such as smuggling ( wiktorowicz 2006 p.302 ) .

Mentioning back to the old point, a instance survey brought up in the article was on the ‘Al-Muhajiroun ‘ which proved to be a popular group throughout the UK, but after the onslaughts on 9/11 the British province condemned the group for showing extremist positions. However during its clip this instance survey provides a perfect illustration of final payments, as the Al-Muhajiron merely offered religious final payments for such a high hazard activity, many in this group ‘viewed activism and even put on the line itself as agencies to accomplish redemption and entryway to paradise ‘ ( Wiktorowicz 2006 p.302 ) . These points articulate that RCT does n’t supply an account of penchant formation, but explains a scheme of picks under a set of ordered penchants ( Wiktorowicz 2006 p.302 ) so RCT is non concerned with why persons prioritise terrorist act to the top of the list but it merely wants to understand why we rationally choose to make something extremely illegal and unsafe.

Last Bruce Hoffman in respects to reason of terrorist act defines ‘terrorism as the deliberate creative activity and development of fright through force or the menace of force in the chase of political alteration. All terrorist Acts of the Apostless involve force or the menace of force. ‘ ( Hoffman 1998 ) his usage of literature such as ‘deliberate ‘ & As ; ‘creation ‘ dorsums up the statements of Wiktorowicz that terrorists pre-plan and fix every measure of terrorist act, this could be in footings of subscribing up for Jihadist onslaughts or the readying of bombs, the terrorists know what they are making and lief do it prosecuting their ain ego involvement at any cost.

Diging into the theoretical underpinnings of the article, I foremost, came across within the literature a mention to Mother Teresa in which she advocated that faith was self-sacrificial and was n’t motivated by external wagess ( Wiktorowicz 2006 p.302 ) . This has one of two benefits ; one the usage of a similar theoretician strengthens Wiktorowicz ‘s statement, as the writer is admiting a principle in the thought that material goods are non the lone driving force of an person. And secondly, within this article by Kwilecki & A ; Wilson we can see a clear running subject for RCT as in the gap abstract they province that ‘this paper applies rational pick to the faith of Mother Teresa ‘ ( Kwilecki 2000 p.205 ) .

Last, upon sing Wiktorowicz ‘s endnote system, we can see the stuff they used to cite and steer their analysis is to a great extent interlinked to the analytical model of RCT, such as ‘the economic attack to human behavior ‘ & As ; ‘an debut to rational pick ‘ by Jon Estler clearly shows that the theoretical underpinnings all point to a RCT position attack and has been applied to the subject of terrorist act.

With RCT being a major ideological rival within the societal scientific discipline universe over the past six decennaries, there is now a immense library of literature attacking and supporting RCT and is presently still turning. To get down I want to discourse the advantages of this peculiar attack in general. First, RCT has survived this long due to its echt cardinal strengths e.g. ‘rationality agreements with common sense in certain simple scenes. For illustration, see a pick between $ 5 and $ 10, no strings attached. ‘ ( Herrnstein 1990 p.357 ) On this footing of behavior, we would ever take the larger amount of money no affair what, so in a sense reasoning against RCT is like reasoning against the principal of incontestable truth and against common sense in general.

Second, the sheer power of this theory is an incontestable strength of its ain, as it has manifested itself into all subjects that examine behaviour from political doctrine to the behaviorism in psychological science ; it is difficult to review such a coherent model. So it ‘s ‘generality ‘ in other words allows premises to be placed into a broad assortment of subject countries, without them being splintered into a mix of complicated sub-theories. This common deductive base detaches them from other chief theories as by cut downing the country of dissension it can work much more expeditiously.

Before 9/11 probes into terrorist cells were minimum, so excessively were activities sing anti-terrorism. However after the onslaughts on the World Trade Centre in New York, we witnessed a major inflow with both participants in high hazard activities every bit good as counter terrorist act bureaus look intoing these extremist motivations. One thing is clear in footings of terrorist act is the fact that RCT has opened up extremist motions who were ‘previously described as imperturbable, ideological Zealots trapped by stiff attachment to dogma, are now regarded as strategic minds. ‘ ( Wiktorowicz 2005 p.13 ) This attack breathes life into the survey of terrorist ‘s actions and how to antagonize such activities e.g. ‘Deterrence ‘ , there is small uncertainty that antique disincentive reduces the sum of terrorist act, and in theory increasing the hazard and badness of being caught should besides go on to drop the sum of people who adopt extremist beliefs.

Second traveling on to the general unfavorable judgment of this theory, which has seen a broad scope of claims made against it, for case RCT can non explicate the being of assorted societal phenomenon ‘s such as trust, reciprocality and particularly charity, as in such administrations the multitudes are the 1s profiting from the persons actions, and the person is n’t rationally taking to maximize their personal benefits. Furthermore in footings of the person ‘s picks, it is safe to state that persons do non possess all cognition and information on everything & A ; anything, so basically worlds rely on heuristics to steer our idea processes which basically intelligent guessing.

This restriction can besides travel further into the fact that in society today and even in the past, people ‘s picks are constrained by the many societal establishments of society ‘the average person will happen his or her actions checked from birth to decease by familial and school regulations ; Torahs and regulations ‘ ( Freidman 1991 p.208 ) . Continuing on from the last point it ‘s seems clear that it ‘s non merely establishments & A ; structures keeping persons back, but the force per unit areas of so called ‘acceptable ‘ behavior as these societal norms are basically a barrier to the chase of opportunism. Last on the general unfavorable judgment towards RCT I ‘d wish to discourse a point raised in the book by Paul Anard who wrote ‘if reason is about consistence, including logical consistence, so human agents can non be considered rational in a full sense. ‘ ( Anard 2002 p.22 ) This quotation mark articulates a really interesting point of view against the cardinal underpinnings of this theory as if RCT states we are so rational in head & A ; organic structure so why do we hold incompatibilities of ideas, and why are these behaviors such a common happening within our society.

A failing RCT has in relation to terrorist act is that RCT by and large operates in a post-hoc mode where research workers normally examine past case in points to rationalize and foretell similar event of the hereafter, ( Lindauer 2012 p.8 ) but in the country of terrorist act this is non a good thought, as one terrorist act is irrational that mathematically people can non ever predict events and secondly, if a error was to be made the effects could be lay waste toing and traumatic as people ‘s lives are at hazard.

As discussed antecedently within this essay, RCT has a high figure of loyal followings and a broad literature on all topics, so as RCT is focused upon behavior, it has made of import inroads to other subject countries non merely the survey of terrorist act. One cardinal country RCT is dominant in, is the low turnout rate within elections. RCT states that ‘turnout is, for many people most of the clip, a low-priced, low-benefit action. ‘ ( Aldrich 1993 p.261 ) so will ever endure. This theory has been the anchor of reform and inducements to return elector apathy and re-engage people back into political relations. For illustration it is of import for a political run to sketch what benefits it will hold on the single causation it to be a high benefit action.

Second RCT is outstanding within criminology and the reason of felons, this subject is similar to terrorist act in regard that, RCT argues ‘the determination to perpetrate an discourtesy is negatively related to the sensed costs of offense and positively related to the sensed wagess of offense ‘ ( Nagin 1993 p.479 ) therefore intending there is a rational mental procedure taking topographic point within the person before a offense is committed. Like junior-grade offense is frequently committed at dark or during quiet hours as felons mentally calculate the benefits, such as they will be less likely to be disturbed or be seen perpetrating a offense. RCT creates a fantastic overview to the behavior of offense and the persons within it.

In decision the analytical model utilised within the article of terrorist act allows for a elaborate and alone position on why persons choose to perpetrate terrorist actions. The writer ‘s usage of instance surveies back up the RCT theory, adding non merely depth but lying out clear empirical grounds of Rational pick for the reader to chew over. Because RCT is a ‘more coherent group defined by a really clear methodological analysis ( Burnham 2008 p.26 ) allows the theory to be implemented into other countries. To give an illustration, the reason within perpetrating offense can be straight compared and contrasted towards terrorist act complecting the mental procedure that go with it, therefore in bend making a powerful theory of analysis which has much literature and backup. Last, reasoning with my ideas on utilizing an analytical model within academic research. I feel utilizing a model is important in order obtain an essay that consists of structural cogency. Analyzing a topic country can be a dashing undertaking particularly a really wide subject like many in the societal scientific disciplines, but utilizing an analytical model can assist interrupt down the subject of your pick assisting you research, gather & A ; present your findings into a consistent statement. Furthermore without a set model the article will try to reply more inquiries than it can reply doing it a weak descriptive academic piece of work.

Get instant access to
all materials

Become a Member