Rhetoric in William Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar Essay Essay
Throughout assorted dramas and pieces. rhetoric is used to carry characters into perpetrating to a important action or determination. In William Shakespeare’s plays. rhetoric is used on a regular basis by characters that plan to carry others into making certain actions that satisfy their ain personal sentiments and demands. As it can take to many unsafe results. the art of persuasion. evoked through utilizations of rhetoric. can be seen as a deadly arm that has the power to do harm and injury. Similarly. the usage of rhetoric besides has the power to uncover truths and individualities. that have been hidden and kept secret and are merely able to be discovered through the conventional induction of persuasion. To wholly carry person else. a character must utilize rhetoric to get the better of one of three cardinal decision-making factors: Logos. Pathos. and Ethos. In William Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar. entreaties to Logos. Pathos. and Ethos are efficaciously used to uncover character. as seen in Cassius. Antony. and Brutus severally. throughout the drama.
Cassius chooses to carry different characters through entreaties to Logos. which indicates his true qualities and facets. and how they reflect his motive. To appeal to Logos. one must appeal to the logical side of a person’s outlook ; they must utilize logical thinking and syllogism to carry another individual into believing that their sentiment is wholly logical. and is hence the best determination to do. This can be seen in Cassius legion times. and it establishes how he is ciphering. logical. and cold. In the 2nd scene of the first act. Cassius tells Brutus that Caesar is non the godly king the he sets himself up to be. and persuades Brutus that Caesar must be overthrown. Cassius convinces Brutus that Caesar is non fit for the thrown by utilizing remembrances of past experiences. in which Caesar can be seen as frail and impotent. to diss Caesar and convince Brutus that he is certainly non strong plenty to be crowned the leader of Rome. “His coward lips did from their coloring material fly. and that same oculus whose bend doth awe the universe did lose his lustre” . ( 1. 2. 122-124 )
The message is that Caesar is weak. and is no stronger than the mean mortal Roman. If Caesar is weak and frail. how will he be able to take an full state? This usage of syllogism entreaties to Brutus’ Logos. and convinces him that it is merely logically fit to hold a strong and capable adult male as leader. if there were to be a leader. through the simple cause-and-effect method. This is an illustration of Cassius being ciphering. logical. and cold as he calculates that Brutus can be persuaded through a sensible. syllogistic entreaty. he uses logic to demo Brutus grounds that Caesar is weak. and he is cold to the fact that Brutus is a really close friend of Caesar. and that turning such good friends against each other would be dishonorable. disrespectful. and inconsiderate to the bond they portion and the significance of their relationship.
Antony uses rhetoric through entreaties to Pathos to efficaciously carry others. and this reveals how he can be seen as smart. empathic. and loyal. An entreaty to Pathos is an entreaty to emotion. instead than logic or credibleness. Antony understands the power of one’s emotions. and uses his cognition of this to carry people into fulfilling his demands by converting them that their emotional desires are the most sensible factor in doing a determination. In the 2nd scene of the 3rd act. Antony gives a traveling address to the Plebians about Caesar’s decease. and how he believes it was a faithless act by the plotters. and that his slaying must be avenged. Antony knows full good that the common rabble is non an rational group in the slightest. and chooses to appeal to emotions in an emotionally overwhelmed crowd. demoing that he is smart and clever.
To carry the Plebian audience into to the full believing that Caesar did non merit to decease. Antony decides to render Caesar’s decease as a personal loss to each single Plebian by exaggerating the manner in which Caesar was killed. and by overstating the treachery of Caesar’s close friend. Brutus. “Through this the well-loved Brutus stabb’d. and as he pluck’d his curst steel off. tag how the blood of Caesar follow’d it. as hotfooting out of doors to be resolv’d if Brutus so unkindly knock’d or no. for Brutus. as you know. was Caesar’s angel” . ( 3. 2. 174-179 ) By dramatising Caesar’s decease. Antony convinces the Plebians that Caesar. the adult male they had loved so much. did non merit to decease in such a ghastly mode. betrayed by his close friends. and therefore causes the Plebians to experience resentful and vindictive for the decease of such a apparently guiltless adult male. By carrying the Plebians into believing that Caesar’s decease must be avenged through an development of their emotional laterality in the determination devising procedure. Antony can be seen as empathic. as he understands the emotional connexion between the Plebians and Caesar and uses it to his advantage. and loyal. as he desires. so strongly. for his best friend to be avenged for such a flagitious and unpatriotic offense.
Ethos is Brutus’ rhetorical device of pick. and his assorted utilizations of it to carry other characters shows that he is proud. honorable. and naive. In the first act of the 2nd scene. Cassius brings the plotters to Brutus’ house. where they discuss their program to kill Caesar. Up until this point in the drama. Brutus declares that he is really honorable towards his ethical motives. and merely does what he believes is right after sing both sides of an statement. Thus. Brutus can be seen as honorable. and proud of his ethical motives. honor and the fact that he ever contemplates the right determination by sing the significance of each factor. Much like the manner Brutus presents himself in such a mode during the beginning of the drama. Brutus can besides be seen as honorable and pride through his utilizations of rhetoric.
In this specific scene. Brutus insists that an curse is unneeded. as they are all honorable work forces and program on making what is best for Rome. “No. non an curse! If non the face of work forces. the sufferance of our psyches. the time’s abuse-If these be motivations weak. interrupt off betimes. and every adult male hence to his idle bed ; so allow high-sighted tyranny scope on. till each adult male bead by lottery” . ( 2. 1. 114-119 ) Here. Brutus tries to carry the plotters into going honorable. if they already aren’t. and believing that their lone motive for killing Caesar should be for the greater good of the Roman Republic.
This shows that Brutus has pride. as he believes that his outlook of honor is the best outlook for this determination. and he is honorable. as he believes that their actions should merely be the most honorable 1s. However. Brutus’ pride in his honor causes him to be naive and blind to the fact that non every one of the plotters agrees with his honorable outlook. Brutus’ pride causes him to believe that his personal outlook is the lone possible outlook. and renders him blind to the fact that the plotters are non killing Caesar for Brutus’ honorable grounds. By going wholly absorbed to the belief that their lone possible motive is for honor. Brutus causes himself to be naive. through his ain honor and pride.