Organizational structure as a determinant of performance: Evidence from mutual funds Essay Essay
Management is an of import facet of any organisation. For an organisation to be successful. it is of import that there should solid direction carried out by directors. All companies that are successful have frequently ensured that they have a sound and strong direction system every bit good as capable directors that can assist in accomplishing the aims of companies.
A director can be described as an person that has been placed in a place of authorization to supervise the operations of an organisation. Management is the art of supervising the operations of an organisation by guaranting that all operations are in line with the aims of the company ( Csaszar. 2012 ) . An organisation is any entity that is focused in accomplishing a corporate aim. Directors as mentioned are individuals in places of authorization within an organisation that are tasked with the duty of supervising the operations of a peculiar organisation. Directors are the determination shapers within an organisation and every determination that they make is frequently implemented with an purpose of run intoing the aims of the organisation ( Aquinas. 2010 ) . The success of any organisation greatly depends on the directors as they are the determinations shapers that influence success. For illustration. when there are operational alterations to be made such as the rate of production within an organisation. a director is profoundly involved in supplying the much needed counsel every bit good as doing the concluding determination on what stairss to set about ( Aghina. Smet. & A ; Heywood. 2014 ) . With the blessing of the director. the rate of production can be increased which can so assist the company to achieve more gross.
Furthermore. directors are of import within organisations since they perform the map of planning. It is the responsibility of the director to be after how operations will be carried out and how each undertaking within the organisation will be undertaken. For illustration. if an organisation has an aim of bettering on its gross revenues. the director will be involved in the planning procedure by make up one’s minding the necessary stairss that need to be taken for the undertaking to be accomplished ( Aquinas. 2010 ) . Furthermore. it is of import to observe that directors are of import in that they play the function of forming. This involves formation of squads every bit good as supplying the appropriate resources that can be used in finishing undertakings ( Janicijevic . 2013 ) . Forming besides involves giving authorization every bit good as delegating the staffs in the company several responsibilities. Directors are besides of import within organisations because they provide the staffing and do determinations on human resources. After measuring the demands that certain operations within an organisation require. a director will take the duty of sourcing for the right employees. recruiting every bit good as guaranting that they are capable of managing the responsibilities ( Aghina. Smet. & A ; Heywood. 2014 ) . The human resource director is frequently the individual in charge of staffing and ensures that there are adequate staffs that can transport out the operations for the success of an organisation.
Apart from the above of import functions of a director. they are besides of import because they provide leading. The success of an organisation will greatly depend on the type of leading that is offered within the company ( Koontz. & A ; Weihrich. 2007 ) . Directors frequently motivate. usher. communicate every bit good as promote the employees under their leading to execute good within the company. The directors besides are of import towards the success of an organisation since they help employees in work outing jobs that they may confront in the class of transporting out their responsibilities. Therefore. through the leading qualities. directors are able to assist a company or concern become successful. Finally. directors are importance within an organisation since they provide control within an organisation ( Janicijevic . 2013 ) . It is of import that there must be frequent and uninterrupted cheques to guarantee that operations of an organisation are in line for the success of the company. Therefore. to guarantee that all things run every bit needed and that there are no loopholes in the operations of an organisation. a director must be available.
Organizational construction refers to the agreement in a hierarchal order which depicts the lines of authorization as they are supposed to be within an organisation. Furthermore. organisational construction depicts the channels of communicating. responsibilities every bit good as the rights as they should flux within the organisation from the top ranking officers to the lower or junior employees. Organizational construction is of great importance because it helps in sketching how an organisation operates in footings of functions. duties every bit good as the powers and how they are assigned to each individual in the company ( Koontz. & A ; Weihrich. 2007 ) . It helps in guaranting that there is proper coordination of operations within an organisation and proper control is maintained to avoid struggles. Furthermore. it is besides to be noted that organisational constructions within organisations are of import in placing how information flows within the organisation.
Figure 1: Organizational chart
The different degrees of direction. that is the top degree. in-between degree. every bit good as the bottom degree direction frequently work closely with each other to guarantee that the primary aims of an organisation are net both in the short tally and in the long tally. It is of import to detect that the organisational construction of any given company will chiefly depend on the aims of the organisation every bit good as its schemes ( Krot. & A ; Lewicka. 2012 ) . When an organisation has a centralised construction. it means that the overall determination devising within the organisation is made at the top degree direction of the company. Furthermore. under a centralised construction. the top direction has great and tight control over all the divisions every bit good as the sections within the organisation and frequently those sections have different degrees of independency.
An organisational construction is of import in that it helps to sketch what steps different stakeholders need to take when covering with the organisation. Furthermore. it is to be noted that organisational construction helps in keeping answerability ( Aquinas. 2010 ) . Through an organisational construction. one is able to cognize who is supposed to be held responsible in instance certain things happen in the company. Every individual has their functions outlined in the construction therefore high degree of answerability is maintained. It is besides of import in the success of an organisation because it helps in the maximization of resources ( Rolinek. Vrchota. Kubecova . & A ; Svarova . 2014 ) . The organisational construction is of import because the resources can be allocated decently by following the right channel of communicating as outlined by the construction.
In an organisational construction. the different degrees of direction are involved in doing different types of determinations for the benefit of the organisation ( Chisa. 2014 ) . It is to be noted that the strategic determinations which are frequently long term determinations of an organisation are made by the top degree direction. These are determinations which shape every bit good as direct the operations of an organisation as a whole and hence the senior directors are the 1s that make such determinations. The top degree direction frequently make their determinations which affect the stakeholders of the organisation such as the stockholders every bit good as the internal stakeholders. The impact of the strategic determinations can be said to be greater than the impact of the operational determinations since the strategic determinations influence the tactical and the operational determinations to be made by other directors. On the other manus. the tactical determinations within an organisation are frequently made by the in-between degree direction. These are determinations which are made and assist in the execution of the schemes of an organisation ( Aquinas. 2010 ) . The in-between degree direction work closely with the top degree direction so that the schemes formulated and the tactical determinations made by the in-between degree direction can ensue in to positive consequences.
The tactical determinations will frequently trust on market research and information to guarantee that the execution of the schemes provide positive consequences in the long tally. Finally. the operational determinations within an organisation are frequently made by the center or the junior direction in an organisation ( Takahara. & A ; Mesarovic. 2003 ) . These determinations frequently involve the day-to-day modus operandi activities that are performed within the organisation. For illustration the determination to alter displacement for employees from clip to clip is an operational determination made by a junior director.
Unilever Plcis one of the transnational corporations that deal in consumer merchandises every bit good as services across the Earth. The vision and mission of Unilever Plc is “helping people to look good. experience good and acquire more out of life. ” The vision and mission of the company is to supply client with consumer merchandises that are of high quality and low-cost ( ain web site ) . The corporate scheme which Unilever has continued to utilize is that of supplying merchandises that meet the outlooks of the consumers every bit good as guaranting that the monetary values are low-cost therefore attractive to clients. Packaging and stigmatization is another corporate scheme the company has been utilizing. guaranting that all its merchandises are packaged in a alone manner ( ain web site ) .
SWOT analysis refers to the analysis conducted on a company to look into on its strengths. failings. the assorted chances it has every bit good as the menaces that it faces in the class of transporting out its operations ( Unilever SWOT Analysis. 2012 ) . This analysis helps in finding whether a company is in a better place as compared to its rivals and can assist in doing of import determinations. It helps in placing chances which a company can take on every bit good as the failings which a company can construct on to better its public presentation. Unilever makes usage of the SWOT analysis to assist do major concern determinations such as the pricing of its merchandises every bit good as packaging and how to manage competition ( Unilever SWOT Analysis. 2012 ) . Under SWOT analysis. the strengths of the company include invention and new merchandises establishing. a strong portfolio for its trade names every bit good as it has made strategic acquisitions. The failing of the company is remembering of its merchandises which affects its gross. The chances include turning new markets such as place and personal attention ( Unilever SWOT Analysis. 2012 ) . However. it is faced with the menace of forgery merchandises in the market. Organizational civilization is besides of import in public presentation of a company. In the instance of Unilever. the company can better its public presentation if its alterations its civilization of holding a broad scope of merchandises under one trade name ( Unilever SWOT Analysis. 2012 ) . The company needs to rebrand and hold different portfolios for its merchandises categorized for each consumer group.
Aghina. W. . De Smet. A. . & A ; Heywood. S. ( 2014 ) . The past and hereafter of planetary organisations. Mckinsey Quarterly. ( 3 ) . 97-106.
Aquinas. P. G. ( 2010 ) . Organization construction and design: Applications and challenges. New Delhi: Excel Books.
Chisa. E. ( 2014 ) . Development of the Product Manager. Communications Of The ACM. 57 ( 11 ) . 48-52. doi:10. 1145/2669480
Csaszar. F. A. ( 2012 ) . Organizational construction as a determiner of public presentation: Evidence from common financess. Strategic Management Journal. 33 ( 6 ) . 611-632. doi:10. 1002/smj. 1969
Janicijevic . N. ( 2013 ) . THE MUTUAL IMPACT OF ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE AND STRUCTURE. EkonomskiAnali / Economic Annals. 58 ( 198 ) . 35-60. doi:10. 2298/EKA1398035J
Koontz. H. . & A ; Weihrich. H. ( 2007 ) . Necessities of direction: An international position. New Delhi: Tata McGraw-Hill.
Krot. K. . & A ; Lewicka. D. ( 2012 ) . THE IMPORTANCE OF TRUST IN MANAGER-EMPLOYEE RELATIONSHIPS. International Journal Of Electronic Business Management. 10 ( 3 ) . 224-233.
Rolinek. L. . Vrchota. J. . Kubecova . J. . & A ; Svarova . M. ( 2014 ) . THE LEVEL OF PROCESS MANAGEMENT PRINCIPLES APPLICATION IN SMEs IN THE SELECTED REGION OF THE CZECH REPUBLIC. Serbian Journal Of Management. 9 ( 2 ) . 203-217. doi:10. 5937/sjm9-6376
Takahara. Y. . & A ; Mesarovic. M. ( 2003 ) . Organization construction: Cybernetic systems foundation. London: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
Unilever SWOT Analysis. ( 2012 ) . Unilever SWOT Analysis. 1-10.