Modern Technology: For Better or Worse Essay Essay
When it comes to the subject of the impact of digital devices or modern engineering on society. most of us will readily hold that engineering has positive and negative effects on our societal and personal life. Where this understanding normally ends. nevertheless. is on the inquiry of does engineering command us? Whereas some are convinced that we need to encompass the engineering. others maintain that we are populating excessively much in the practical. While still others are concerned about how we lose sight of the world because of technology’s capableness to do it go on. Andrew Lam. a Vietnamese journalist and a short narrative author makes a point in his article “I Tweet. Therefore I am” about how engineering is drastically altering the manner we look and react in our society. One of the illustrations he uses to clear up his point is about the professor who collapsed while fixing to give a talk. Lam said. “Instead of assisting him. many pupils in the audience took out their cell phones. snapped exposures. texted and tweeted” ( Lam 1 ) .
The pupils wanted to be the first one to distribute the intelligence so that they could derive popularity or experience proud of themselves for holding the power of entering the extraordinary event that merely happened. As we try to be the first one to state the intelligence. we don’t recognize that we are losing our empathy. The pupils sure did experience severely for their professor. but their first reaction was that they have to enter it alternatively of giving a manus or naming an ambulance. I understand why the pupils reacted by taking images or pictures of their professors. because I besides had those times where I witnessed some unusual occurrences and the first reaction I felt is that I have to take images of it and portion it with my friends by posting the pictures/videos in societal webs I am utilizing. I besides understand why Lam is concerned about this. but this is a world that automatically happens as we immerse in the coevals of engineering.
This is non good because we are allowing the influence of engineering forget one of the most of import facets of socialising. demoing regard and attention to person. We are altering in order to suit in to the digital media and societal universe. Lam references. “Generations have been raised on picture games. spent the majority of their lives in confab suites and on YouTube. on cellular telephones and iPods. They have been conditioned to put the majority of their emotional life in the practical space” ( Lam 5 ) . I agree that most of us. in this coevals. insulate ourselves in our ain topographic point inside the engineering. It makes us busy in non such a productive manner because we can sit in a chair or prevarication in bed merely concentrating on our phones. computing machines or tablets and non recognize that we’ve merely wasted hours or worse. our whole twenty-four hours. I could remain in my sleeping room confronting my laptop. chew the fating my friends for three hours. When I am done with chew the fating. I close my laptop and get down texting.
When I don’t text I watch amusing and interesting picture on my iPod. Therefore. I would state that my day-to-day modus operandi is occupied with engineering and nomadic devices. whether it is good or non. engineering is a portion of every individual twenty-four hours of my life. As we get benefits in the usage of engineering. we besides need to accept the effect that comes with it. Lam besides makes a strong point when he said his position about the societal media and its effects in on our personal lives. “We do non to the full exist without some kind of electronic imprint in the practical universe. a digital projection of ourselves” ( Lam 25 ) . I agree with that because as I see it. we are now in a coevals where people use engineering. our life revolves around it. and we introduce ourselves to others utilizing engineering. We are so get downing to care less and less about our personal lives.
We are now posting what we feel on a Facebook position. we tweet our ideas in Twitter. we even write what we are making and where we are in our personal web logs. Alternatively of merely composing it in our diary or diary. we are now sharing it to the universe which makes us experience portion of the society but doing us care less about what we portion and lets us bury the existent significance of privateness. What I don’t agree with in Lam’s article is when he said that. “…they ( we ) may merely be go forthing something of import and unretrievable behind” ( Lam ) . because although there are certain negative impacts of engineering. I would non state that we are losing empathy as we immerse ourselves into the digital devices because the engineering and its promotion aids the society as a whole and the of import things we want to portion. Whether it is good or bad intelligence. we get the freedom of sharing it. making more people faster. Most significantly is when we find some people who can associate to us doing us experience more of import and better. and that is because of the widespread influence of the engineering.
Another essay that makes a point and shows concern about the impact of engineering is entitled “How Computer Change the Way We Think” by Sherry Turkle. and Abby Rockefeller Mauze Professor of the Social Studies of Science and Technology at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Turkle’s concern is how digital devices change the ways we think. how we are all trusting on the benefits of engineering and as we rely on it. We are losing our true individuality and ability to make deep thought. Technology blinds us with what is most of import. which is basking and doing friendly relationships and relationships through physical interaction. Tukle said. “For those who are lonely yet afraid of familiarity. information engineering has made it possible to hold the semblance of company without the demand of friendship” ( Turkle 603 ) .
Alternatively of run intoing existent friends in the park or promenade. we add “friends” on Facebook. Alternatively of speaking to a individual face to face. we can text or twirp them and they will text/tweet back to us. Technology helps our societal life easier in a manner that we are losing the ability to interact to a individual physically. As a personal illustration. when my household and I are holding a dinner in a eating house and while waiting for our order to come. we hold our iPods and smartphones. texting or playing games and I notice the silence because we are so busy with our appliances and nomadic devices. After reading Turkle’s concerns. I realize how ill-mannered that is. We are in the eating house to bond and talk. yet we are in our appliances speaking to other people who are non in the tabular array by agencies of texting. We are playing games alternatively of chortling with our sisters and brothers.
We are easy burying the importance of holding a face to confront interaction. We depend so much in the computing machine that we are now allowing the computing machines do the work for us and it is doing us make less deep thought. Furthermore on Turkle’s concerns. he said “It does non learn pupils to get down a treatment or concept a narrative. It encourages presentation. non conversation” ( Turkle 603 ) . Though the PowerPoint gives us better expression of what we want to portion. it besides have negative effects particularly to pupils. Because of the PowerPoint. the category has now deficiency of treatment. doing the PowerPoint do all the talk. The “swooshing sounds. alive icons. and flashing trial. a slide show” ( Turkle 603 ) . distracts the pupils from the existent intent of the presentation. Some focus excessively much to the maps of PowerPoint and stop up thought of how can we do it looks attractive to the eyes of the audience alternatively of how they can understand the thoughts behind chief points.
When it comes to privateness. we are non to the full cognizant of the negative and unsafe impacts of sharing our personal information to the populace and to the authorities. We thought that every bit long as it’s the manner to acquire entree on peculiar web sites. it is all right to portion anything they ask for. Turkle says. “Unlike past coevalss of Americans. who grew up with the impression that the privateness of their mail was inviolable. our kids are accustomed to electronic surveillance as portion of their day-to-day lives” ( Turkle 602 ) . When it comes to accessing web services. I besides don’t hesitate giving my personal information such as my name. reference. contact figure and I am willing to type it down as it is the lone manner to acquire in to the web services that I need. particularly for school and work. Besides for societal webs. it is required to set my name. a profile image and some basic information such as birth day of the month and relationship position.
Technology is taking off our privateness. We are giving the universe to entree our life. The dangers of sharing information have been in the intelligence today. There are now people who hack histories and seek to alter or mess with our profile. Although we are cognizant of the danger of sharing personal information on the computing machine. we are still making it because we enjoy its benefits. Whatever negative impacts we get in engineering and nomadic devices. we have to confront the world that we are now in a coevals where engineering will turn and turn and the following coevalss to come will depend on it more than we depend on it now. The lone thing we can make is non to allow engineering to the full command our day-to-day life by appreciating the outside universe and the existent people.
Lam. Andrew. “I Tweet. Therefore I Am” . Reading Culture: Context for Critical Reading and Writing. Ed. Diana George and John Trimbur. New Jersey: Pearson Education. Inc. . 2012 Print. Turkle. Sherry. “How Computers Change The Way We Think” . The Writer’s Presence. Ed. Donald McQuade and Robert Atwan. 7th erectile dysfunction. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin’s. 2012. Print.