Managing Cultural Diversity due to Globalisation Essay

essay A+
  • Words: 4385
  • Category: Database

  • Pages: 16

Get Full Essay

Get access to this section to get all the help you need with your essay and educational goals.

Get Access

Equally far as the cognition in natural philosophies is concerned, by and large we know that, Galaxies that one survey is all controlled by the same jurisprudence. The fact is besides non wholly true that, the universe is created by worlds merely, therefore we can give prominence to another fact that there are different civilizations in the universe, which operates harmonizing to their ain kineticss, rules & A ; Torahs, and clip & A ; infinite are alone for each civilization ( Hall and Hall, 1990 ) .

Restricting the constellation to human civilization, it can be said that people belonging from different civilizations have different attitudes, behavior, values and beliefs, these differences can largely be seen at the clip when they make determination, in fact the state of affairs acts most efficaciously in the instances when people from different civilization come together for a same intent seemingly can be understood as extract of Cross-Culture for a valuable consequence or to make a set end. Taking the state of affairs in consideration with any big multi-site or multi-national administration, the determinations taken are likely to act upon other people in the administration like the directors, sub-ordinates, spouses, equals, etc. therefore it can be realized that for an international director it is necessary to first recognize and so react to the chances and menaces they face. Taking into history The Globalisation, there has been an outgrowth in the planetary, information-oriented civilization because of the progress telecommunication, mass transit, engineering and alterations in the planetary political sphere.

Sing the Multi-national administration, which is defined by Mead ( 2005 ) as those companies that ain and manage investings located in states other than that of caput office. Pull offing the peoples belonging to different civilizations on a same platform largely come in vision through these companies in normally known as cross-culture direction.

Culture is the most diversified portion with limitless definitions sing different facets like the political, faith, economical, educational, national, organizational, corporate, etc. In general, it is said to be the values held by the members belonging to a peculiar civilization. This is besides a noticeable point that it is rather hard to analyze civilization and fundamentally the national civilization. Tayeb ( 2003 ) says, “ A changeless threadaˆ¦through our lives which makes us distinguishable from others particularly those in other states: this yarn is our national civilization ” . Harmonizing to her there are two elements which are lending towards the edifice of state and the creative activity of the national civilization:

The physical environment ;

History the state had undergone ;

She has besides referred to the establishments that refer to the constitution of national civilization which include Family, Religion, Education, Mass communicating media, and the multi-national companies.

Despite of the great diverseness in human civilizations there are few features which are basically common fundamentally for the scientific analysis. Murdock ( 1969 ) has specified these features as ; Culture is learned, inculcated, societal, conceptional, satisfying, adaptative and integrative. To apologize these features Murdock stated, civilization is non natural, unconditioned or transmitted but it is the erudite inclinations to respond which are acquired by single from his life ‘s experience. All the human existences compared with other animal are considered to larn and instill or go through on their wonts to their progeny. These wonts are non merely inculcated but transmitted over clip and are societal as they are shared by human existences populating in organized societies and maintain unvarying due to societal force per unit area. Traditionally recognized thought is an component of civilization, every person demo some grade of consciousness to cultural norms, an ability to distinguish them from strictly single wonts and a installation in gestating and describing them in item. Culture well satisfies the basic primary and secondary demands, the elements are considered to be tested accustomed techniques which gratify human urges in adult male ‘s interaction with the external universe. As clip alterations, civilization alterations i.e. people adapt alterations in their civilization as per the state of affairs like globalisation, modernisation, engineering, etc nevertheless the nucleus values remain the same, likewise several parts of civilizations are in perfect equilibrium doing it an incorporate system.

Cleary ( 2003 ) describes that there are specific cognition and beliefs that form a content of a peculiar civilization which differ from other civilizations ensuing in different groups holding different values, forms and behavior, normally known as the cultural difference. If the difference in civilization is high so the communicating between these civilizations becomes harder, ensuing in creative activity of misinterpretation and misperception. Thus it is necessary for peoples and sooner peoples who are working across civilization to analyze the civilization in which they work.

There are different models followed to analyze the national civilization and one of the recognizable model was given by Greet Hofstede. Hofstede ( 2001 ) referred civilization as, “ The corporate scheduling of the head that distinguishes the members of one group or class of people from another ” . His survey was based on the informations collected from 116,000 peoples working in IBM which belonged to 40 different states. It can be assumed that the end for his survey was to acquire a agencies which can be used to place different national civilizations. His research in civilization and direction is besides known world-wide, and the dimension of civilization resulted finally from his surveies were ;

Beginning: Adapted from Hofstede ( 2001 )

These dimensions of civilization given by Hofstede include Power Distance, which is the attitude towards the authorization and the distance between the persons in the hierarchy. The grade of tolerance for uncertainness and in stableness is Uncertainty Avoidance, Individual versus Group Orientation is in short the independency and mutuality, the trueness towards oneself and towards group, Masculinity versus Feminine Orientation is the importance of work ends compared with the personal ends and Short-run versus Long-term Orientation, this dimension was given by Hofstede and Bond together in the twelvemonth 1988, which mean to further virtuousnesss related to the past and present or the virtuousnesss related to hereafter.

Points which strengthened Hofstede survey were, it made possible to compare among national civilizations, and besides it helped to cognize what in general to accept from the given portion of the universe. His model for cultural dimension was besides accepted by the universe for separating among major cultural group. The model was found to be applicable to work related values every bit good as the values in general ( Reisinger 2009 ) .

Although the model given by Hofstede for analyzing civilization was considered to be good for analysis, but there were certain duty towards his surveies. Browaeys and Price ( 2008 ) argued that the dimension given by him were less in figure which enabled the perceivers and analyst to nail to the characteristics to which they and readers can associate. This is besides the fact that his survey was limited to one company and therefore it is non possible to acquire information about the national civilization by a survey of limited people as it would merely uncover the civilization of that peculiar degree of people studied upon and non the whole state. Silverthrone ( 2005 ) commented as, Hofstede ‘s variables are the general tendencies which are averaged across big figure of people ‘s behavior but his attack besides provides interesting model for research and speculating about organisation and cultural difference.

The inquiry about ‘what drives the cultural alteration ‘ has ever attracted many research workers in different Fieldss. Though the national civilization and organizational civilization are supposed to be linked together but working together in a national civilization has undergone an extended and intensive probe. The ends, manuals, regulations & A ; ordinances and besides the long standing employees are considered to be the internal factors which influence company ‘s civilization. Harmonizing to Mead ( 2005 ) , there are two different factors which are considered to be act uponing the determination devising within the administration ; the internal factors which include the psychological makeup, administration schemes, resources, history, policies & A ; organizational civilization and the external factors which include determinations of rivals, providers, clients, the labor market, engineering, economic systems, political relations, ethical & A ; spiritual systems, industry involvement and national civilization every bit good. Hence, the survey about civilization in today ‘s scenario is considered to be of import, because of the fact that it helps to increase the relation between different civilizations ensuing in the effectual direction of the administration.

Some other factors which influence the civilization of the administration which are supposed to drive cultural alteration comprise Globalisation every bit good. “ Progresss in telecommunication, mass transit & A ; engineering and alterations in the planetary political sphere have led to the outgrowth of a planetary information-oriented civilization ” ( Harris et al. 2009 ) . The globalisation of the economic sciences and market topographic point besides the progress communicating engineerings are supposed to be reassigning the work civilization and the work force. Other than Globalization there are some more factors which drives the cultural alteration, harmonizing to Jackson ( 2009 ) , there is one large thing which all the civilizations have in their bosom, which is the Vision. A great vision has the power to animate, but at the really last the vision should be credible and persuadable. Andersen and Taylor ( 2006 ) argue that there are several causes which drive the cultural alteration like the alterations in the social status, cultural diffusion, invention and the infliction of cultural alteration by an outside bureau. These conditions are similar to the alteration in organizational civilization where alteration in market, invention of merchandises and making concern other than the topographic point of caput quarters, fundamentally the concern of multi-site and multi-national companies.

In a research, Inglehart and Welzel ( 2005 ) found that research and theory on Socio-economic development or Modernization developed two contenting ideas, one emphasises the convergence of values as a consequence of modernization- the overpowering force that drives cultural alteration and other idea is the continuity of traditional values which are comparatively independent of economic conditions. Inglehart and Welzel ( 2005 cited Meyer et al. , 1997 and Stevenson, 1997 ) studied that convergence around some set of ‘modern ‘ values is improbable ; traditional values will go on to exercise an independent influence on cultural alterations caused by Socio-economic development or Modernization. The cultural alteration is path dependant, although the value systems of different states are traveling in the same way which is due to the impact of powerful modernization forces, the value systems are non been meeting, as simplistic impressions of cultural globalisation suggest. Ritzer ( 2010 ) argues that, “ Cultures are capable to many of the same planetary flows and tend to turn more similar ” . In his statement towards the cultural convergence he says it is based on the thought that globalisation tends to take to the increasing similarities in whole universe, and there is a inclination to see planetary assimilation in the way of dominant groups and societies in the universe.

Globalization, the concert is doing people move from one portion of universe to other and indulging in different civilizations non belonging to them. Jansson ( 2007 ) says that emerging company markets have become more of import for the multi-site and multi-national companies, Under the moving ridge of 3rd internationalisation the multi-national companies belonging from developed western states are traveling to the approaching Asiatic and cardinal & A ; eastern European market. The cross-hauling of foreign direct investing ( FDI ) is doing state market more planetary. Harmonizing to Ngomba-Roth ( 2007 ) , transnational companies have different dimensions which can be viewed from several positions like the ownership, direction, scheme and construction etc. , Associating it to the international directors or planetary leaders, it is apprehensible that it becomes a spot hard for them to pull off the people belonging to different cultural background working in the same multi-national or multi-site company, therefore directors or leaders use different signifier of schemes to pull off cross-culture.

In favour of cross-culture direction an celebrated strategically approached survey was done by Perlmutter and Heenan. Kniel ( 2009 cited Perlmutter and Heenan, 1979 ) distinguished multi-national companies by nonsubjective standards to attitudinal standards and subsequently the qualitative standards of the top direction. The construct by and large distinguishes the different types of policies used in head-quarter orientation. These policies are showm in diagram below ;


Beginning: Adapted from Kniel ( 2009 cited Perlmutter and Heenan, 1979 )

Ethnocentrism ( native state orientation ) : These are considered to be general attitudes of the top direction for seting place state national in the cardinal places of the organisation everyplace around the universe, it shows the inclination to experience the group is more intelligent, capable and dependable, home state policies and patterns become default criterion for subordinates ( Kniel 2009, cited Perlmutter and Heenan, 1979 ) . Beller and Leerssen ( 2007, cited Sumner, W.G. 1906 ) defined ethnocentrism as “ this is the position of things in which 1 ‘s ain group is the Centre of everything, and all others are scaled and rated with mention to it ” .

Ethnocentrism has both advantages and disadvantages ; the members of group can develop a sense of pride, well-being and security, increase trueness and pride for the group, strengthens group moral, self-esteem and besides brings integrating and stableness for the group. But ethnocentrism can besides steer to intrasocietal atomization when there are many sub civilizations in the society. It can unable people to understand others and acquire into them and may ensue in inter-group struggles and jobs ( Panopio and Rolda, 2006 ) .

Polycentrism ( host state orientation ) : The attack focuses on the unsimilarity in civilizations and statement that ‘one fits all ‘ is impractical, hence accommodating different civilizations become a possible approachaˆ¦ “ We truly do n’t understand what ‘s traveling on there, but we have to hold assurance in them ” ( Kniel 2009, cited Perlmutter and Heenan, 1979 ) .

Polycentrism is considered to be opposite of Ethnocentrism, as it has the virtue of accommodating to the concern schemes to the local conditions. As the local directors are given penchants the grade of geographic decentalisation maximizes ( Cherunilam 2007 ) .

Adler and Gielen ( 2001 ) said the disadvantage towards this attack is that all host subjects are non every bit and interchangeably good in the local civilization, there is a decrease in the promotion and development of bearer as the chances in their national boundary line are limited.

Harmonizing to Bowie and Buttle ( 2004 ) the selling of Best Western Hotels, a multi-national cordial reception organisation, is typically polycentric as each state develops its ain selling run for host state consumers.

Regiocentrism: An attack carrying functional rationalisation on the footing of more than one state, grouping states into larger regional entities, e.g. European Union. The directors in these instances are recruited, developed, assigned and appraised on the regional footing ( Kniel 2009, cited Perlmutter and Heenan, 1979 ) .

Keeley ( 2001 ) explains that multi-national company with Regiocentrism policy has an advantage of utilizing wider pool of directors, and the part enjoys the grade of decision-making liberty. But this construction is associated with possible limited interaction between subordinates of different parts and single subordinates and parent company.

Harmonizing to Bowie and Buttle ( 2004 ) one of the largest regiocentric hotel company in the universe is Hong-Kong based Shangri-La hotels in Asia.

Geocentrism ( universe oriented construct ) : The attack is seeking an employee who is best in his abilities and is irrespective of the nationalityaˆ¦ “ To incorporate diverse parts through a planetary systems attack to determination devising ” ( Kniel 2009, cited Perlmutter and Heenan, 1979 ) .

The advantages of geocentrism attack is that it increases the planetary leading development chances, increases the acquisition and cognition of cross-cultural chances, it provides a greater chance for developing a common multi-national company individuality, besides leads to indirect competitory advantage in human capital ( Vance and Paik, 2010 ) . But there are some disadvantages evaluated from this attack ( Iyer 2009 ) like, Torahs of state saying the demand of certain figure of native employees, it reduces the liberty of foreign subordinates, and the largest disadvantage is the cost for traveling international directors from a subdivision to other.

To pull off across civilizations in multi-national and multi-site organisations Paul Lawrence and Jay Lorsch have discovered a model named Integration-Responsiveness ( or I/R Framework ) in the twelvemonth 1969, the model was really utilised for analyzing administrations in 1981 by Doz, Bartlett and Prahalad. A multi-national company is comprised of set of different organisations, which operates harmonizing to the local environment, like a part, state or countries within the state. In 1989, Bartlett and Ghoshal extended this model depicting a multi-national company facing challenges and at the same time achieve Global integrating and local reactivity while it besides facilitates global acquisition. In a concern there are full scope of maps which can be understood as shaped by force per unit areas of planetary integrating and local reactivity. An upstream map shows a greater demand of planetary integrating and downstream map normally tend to demand the local reactivity ( Stahl and Bjorkman 2006 ) .

Morschett et Al. ( 2009 ) described Global Integration as procedure of complecting international activities of MNC across all states to look at the strength of big company and seek to make the synergy consequence. Similarly the MNC ‘s operate in heterogenous conditions in different host states holding different clients, market, rivals, distribution construction, permutation and the host authorities. The MNC must hold the ability to use the chance aroused from heterogeneousness and this eventuality status is called forces of local reactivity. Morschett et Al. ( 2009 cited Yip 1989 ; Bartlett/Ghoshal/Beamish 2008 ) hold given four forces of planetary integrating ; the market drivers, cost drivers, governmental drivers, and competitory drivers, these forces are besides known as the industry globalisation drivers. Similarly some of the forces which drive the local reactivity comprise of Differences in demand, concentrate on national differences and antiphonal and incorporate nature fundamentally in multi-national and multinational companies, and working Ideal type in specific state of affairss.

For I/R model different degrees were distinguished ( Morschett et al. 2009 ) ; the external environment, where the forces of planetary integrating and local reactivity reach different degree as per industry. The 2nd degree is the MNC ‘s strategic orientation, where some MNC usage planetary scheme and some use multi-national attacks finally exposing different degrees of planetary integrating and local reactivity. The concluding degree is Strategy of subordinates which differs more or less from integrating of MNC ‘s and their adaptable behavior towards local market.

There may be different schemes or tactics available for the cross cultural direction but these schemes or tactical or models can merely be successfully utilised for good will of the MNC when there is a consistence in the administration and civilization. Champoux ( 2010 ) describes that consistence is the grade of understanding within the organisation members about the of import values and basic premise.

The trustiness in people is by and large based on the consistence in character, likewise in administration there should be coherency between the civilization and values of administration and the policies, procedures and behavior of the organisation. When there is consistence, there is unity, but when there is no consistence, the organisational disagreement appears and people get caught in center and trust is lost ( Banks and Stevens, 2005 ) . In similar context, Ferguson ( 2003 ) argued that to do the company more effectual the directors try to make a strong civilization that can promote and back up ends and utile behaviors. In an organisational civilization the consistence can be referred as frequence of reproductions of attitudes, values and behavior and the action on it by constitutional people. Some experts believe that when there is a strong organisational civilization it has positive impact on the organisational effectivity as the shared value, believes and behaviors are decently understood by big figure of people in organisation therefore organisations can better the ability to make a set end successfully.

The inquiry of whether a director from one civilization can accommodate to different scheme from another director belonging to different civilization in the same MNC is ever under research by different research workers. In the context of MNC, Gupta ( 2009 ) classified three degrees of schemes ; Corporate scheme, Business scheme and Functional scheme. Corporate scheme is the map of top direction to see the involvement and operations of administration, Business unit scheme is concerned with the operations of peculiar concern, and functional degree scheme creates a model for transporting out corporate and concern schemes. When a civilization is consistent with these schemes, a house can so develop effectual game program.

Harmonizing to Scott ( 2007 ) , in any state of affairs it is of import to acknowledge that there is non merely one solution which can suit to all status. One needs to accommodate to the state of affairss, ain manner, personality and the employee every bit good, so to make up one’s mind whether to do a systematic or structural alteration in workplace. Different schemes, tactics and rules work best for different clip as per the state of affairs.

It is said that the route to resiliency is ever personal and different people use different schemes. Some civilizations use resiliency or develop resilience in different ways. Maiden et Al. ( 2006 cited Comas-Diaz et al. , 2002 ) formulated 10 schemes for accommodating these state of affairss ; Make connexion, Avoid seeing crisis as unsurmountable jobs, Accept that alteration is portion of life, Move towards your ends, Take decisive actions, Look for chances for self find, Nurture a positive position of yourself, Keep things in position, Maintain a hopeful mentality, and Take attention of yourself.

Lane et Al. ( 2006 ) hold given an MBI theoretical account for the intercultural effectivity in the planetary direction which is shown below ;


Beginning: Lane et al. 2006

Harmonizing to the above MBI theoretical account for any state of affairs an international/global direction should first map out the entire state of affairs by understanding the differences as per the dimensions of civilization and place of ain and others, so span, that is communicate across the differences by fixing through motive and assurance and decentring or re-centring with incrimination and commonalties. Followed by the integrating, where one needs to pull off across the differences by the methods of edifice engagement, deciding struggles and edifice on all thoughts. If the differences are valued so the differences will make value taking to high public presentation.

Kazmi ( 2008 cited Waldersee and Griffiths 2004 ) adopted two types of alteration execution ; Participative and Unilateral. Participative alteration is done through support of people, by agencies of behavioural-social intercessions such as organisation development and sensitiveness preparation. On the other manus, one-sided alterations are forced from the top direction and implemented by the technical-structural agencies such as system and procedure redesign or administrative alterations in term of redefining authorization and work regulations. Therefore this can be realized from the above informations that to follow alteration will all depend on the person and organisational schemes and civilization, which may or may non let them to accommodate alterations as per the state of affairs.

Sing the context with mention to the service industry, where service is defined as, “ the consequences generated, by activities at the interface between the organisation and the client and by the organisation ‘s internal activities, to run into client demands ” ( Subburaj, 2005 cited International Standard, ISO 9000 ) . Aharoni ( 1997 cited Riddle 1986 ) specified that, specific constituents of service which are normally adapted to host state include ; service ability, environment, bringing manner, and merchandise manner but the diverseness in service make it of import to acknowledge that these versions will change from different types of services with mention to the cultural features of the host state. The cultural values non merely impact the service bringing but besides act upon the political precedence, which is assigned to service sector development and grade of province intercession. SERVQUAL or RATER is a model which gives the dimensions of service quality. The diagram below shows the facets of this model ;


Beginning: Adapted from Kandampully et Al. ( 2001 ) and Khosrowpour ( 2000 ) [ cited Parsuraman et Al. ( 1988, 1991 and 1994a ) ]

The above diagram shows the dimensions of Servicess which include ; Reliability reflecting the service supplier ‘s ability to supply service faithfully and accurately. It extends to supply services as and when promised without mistakes. Tangible means the visual aspect of physical installations, equipments, forces and communicating stuffs. Responsiveness indicates willingness to assist the clients and supply prompt service. Assurance represents the cognition, courtesy and ability to animate trust and assurance. Empathy relates to the lovingness, individualized attending a house provides to the client [ Kandampully et Al. ( 2001 ) and Khosrowpour ( 2000 ) cited Parsuraman et Al. ( 1988, 1991 and 1994a ) ] . Usunier and Lee ( 2005 ) discussed the dimensions of service bringing or brushs are common across civilizations but the rating of these dimensions varies harmonizing to the client ‘s perceptual experience.

Galletta and Zhang ( cited Liu et Al. 2001 ) studied that clients belonging to different civilizations are found to organize different perceptual experience of service quality ; may be because of the differences in outlooks or an disposition towards different service quality standards. Following the Hofstede theoretical account of cultural dimension it was identified that clients belonging to civilizations which are characterized by lower individuality or higher uncertainness turning away tend to hold a higher purpose to honor if they receive first-class service, likewise can utilize negative word of oral cavity or can kick if they receive hapless service. These effects are considered to be opposite with clients holding civilizations characterized by higher individuality or lower uncertainness turning away. It can be realized that both clients and employees of organisation have some influence of civilization in their behavior which can do the cross-culture direction more complex.

Harmonizing to Young and Nie ( 1996 ) the administration in service sector can pull off this complexness by making an ain sub-culture of organisation, organizing an international squad where the members belong to different cultural background, and acquisition, esteeming, understanding and seeking to accept each other ‘s civilization can assist in making cross-culture synergism.

Harris et Al. ( 2004 ) suggests that a planetary leader of an organisation belonging to any sector working as an MNC, should larn and understand a civilization and its sensitiveness, usage communicating as an resource in cultural difference to get the better of cross- cultural misinterpretation and misperception. A Global leader can utilize the scheme of dialogue and confederations with different civilizations in which they work, for increasing the profitableness of the organisation. Leaderships should accommodate to alterations as per the state of affairs, manage passages and resettlements every bit good as manage diverseness in planetary work civilization and understand the synergism in organisational civilization and its executions.

French ( 2007 ) argues that people should be cognizant about the impact of civilization in any work administration as it enhances the worlds of daily life in an increasing figure of work scenes and besides part to the effectual direction of employees in term of meeting ends set to mensurate organizational success. Besides Browaeys and Price ( 2008 ) express that if the consciousness of the cultural difference is consciously raised, so the ability to analyze the effectivity of using concern policies in differing cultural environments is well improved.

Get instant access to
all materials

Become a Member