Irony in “The Story of an Hour” Essay
There are many types of sarcasm such as basic sarcasm which is the usage of word to convey a significance that is opposite of its actual significance. Situational sarcasm which is the minute a characters actions have the antonym of their intended consequence. Finally there is dramatic sarcasm which occurs when there is a contrast between the readers knowledge and the cognition of the characters in the work. However situational sarcasm is what largely transpires in Kate Chopin short narrative “The Story of an Hour”
Situational sarcasm is used in “The Story of an Hour” through Mrs. Mallard’s reaction to her husband’s decease. When she foremost heard the intelligence of her husband’s decease. Mrs. Mallard. “wept at one time. with sudden. wild abandonment” ( Chopin. 1 ) . Everyone in the house thought that she was disquieted and went upstairs to be entirely in her room because this is a common reaction after holding merely lost a loved one. Although one time Mrs. Mallard is entirely in her room. Chopin wants the reader to witness that she is non saddened by the loss of her hubby but relieved. “When she abandoned herself a small whispered word escaped her somewhat parted lips. She said it over and over under her breath: “free. free. free! ”” ( Chopin. 1 ) Although Mrs. Mallard is “free” from her matrimony that does non intend that she did non love her hubby. as she looks through the unfastened window from which she gazes represents freedom and chances.
Alternatively of being dark and full of heartache to typify how one would anticipate her to experience. she sees spots of bluish sky. fluffy clouds and crowns. She besides hears vocalizing of birds and smells a rainstorm coming. Chopin signifies this as new get downing for Mrs. Mallard. Everything that she experiences through her clip of “mourning” suggests joy and a new life that awaits her. She is expected to mourn her husband’s decease. but she is believing about her new life “There would be no one to populate for her during those coming old ages ; she would populate for her self” ( Chopin. 2 ) this is to be understood that she has sacrificed her life for her hubby. although there is no grounds that her hubby has done her life “for her” . The linguistic communication Chopin uses throughout her narrative foreshadows the dry felicity that she feels with being free.
Chopin farther more attempts to explicate that she is non merely experiencing felicity through her husband’s decease when she writes. “She knew that she would cry once more when she saw the sort. stamp custodies folded in decease ; the face that had ne’er looked save with love upon her. fixed and grey and dead. ” ( Chopin. 1 ) It is non clear on why Louise Mallard feels this manner about her husband’s decease because there is no grounds on any physical or emotional maltreatment. repression or disregard from her hubby “it might hold been external. in society or in her matrimony or whether it was internal. a acknowledgment that it takes strength to command one’s feelings or caprices. ” ( Berkove. 153 ) .
Through Louise’s acknowledgment that she is free from her hubby there is situational and dramatic sarcasm every bit good. While she was entirely in her room she realized that she would no longer be bound to her hubby but instead free to make whatever she should take. ” “Free! Body and soul free! ” she kept whispering. ” ( Chopin. 2 ) She continues to whisper this to herself because although she is entirely in her room she acknowledges that she should non be holding such ideas and does non desire anyone to cognize how she truly feels about her husband’s decease. No 1 else knew this. they all believed that she was sorrowful and wanted to be entirely to sorrow. Josephine. a adult female in the house. even though Mrs. Mallard was doing herself ill. but in world Louise was absorbing the yearss in front of her.
Her overpowering joy all comes to an disconnected halt when she descends from her room to merely happen out that her hubby is non dead. She is so aghast to see her hubby that she has a bosom onslaught and as physicians described it as. “joy that kills. ” which is perceived as the dramatic irony portion of the short narrative. Everyone believes she died in that manner so the reader can really recognize that she was in fact non joyful to see her hubby alternatively in confusion and disturbance that she merely had a glance of existent freedom and would instead be dead than to travel back and live the life she had. “Louise dies in the universe of her household where she has ever sacrificed for others” ( Ewell. 160. )
Kate Chopin’s “The Story of an Hour” is one of the many books that says “so much in so few words” ( Berkove. 152 ) . The sarcasm in her narrative is about ne’er stoping. Louise Mallards life after detecting about her hubbies decease is the true significance of “the narrative of an hour” because she had a speedy expression of how her life was traveling to be.
Chopin. Kate. “The Story of an Hour. ” Katechopin. org Kate Chopin International Society. April 19. 1894. Web. 1 Nov. 2014.
2. Berkove. Lawrence I. American Literary Realism. Vol. 32. No. 2: Fatal Self-assertion in Kate Chopin’s “The Story of an Hour. ” Jstor. org. 2000. Web. 1 Nov. 2014
3. Ewell. Barbara C. “Chopin and the Dream of Female Selfhood: Kate Chopin Reconsidered” Jstor. org. 2000. Web. 1 Nov. 2014