Human Rights Essay Essay

essay A
  • Words: 1977
  • Category: Database

  • Pages: 8

Get Full Essay

Get access to this section to get all the help you need with your essay and educational goals.

Get Access

The issue sing human rights’ misdemeanors became outstanding for the first clip after the Second World War. After the war the foundation of the United Nations acted as an drift towards the initial development of the model sing the Human Rights. At first the offenses committed by the Nazi government in its occupied states had been in focal point. Before that there have merely been some limited efforts made sing prohibiting international slave trade and standardising working conditions. The initial attempts made in this respect were in the signifier of declaration.

Further advancement was made in 1946 when the ECOSOC set up a Commission on Human Rights and later a Sub-Commission on the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights was formed. ( Rittberger & A ; Zangl. 2006 ) This was the beginning of the UN Human Rights government. This paper will discourse the outgrowth and development of the UN Human Rights Regime. The paper will besides discourse the overall public presentation of the UN Human Rights programme during the last 60 old ages. its accomplishments and failures. pros and cons every bit good as given an penetration about the future chances of the Human Rights government in the twenty-first century.

UN Human Rights Government: The UN General Assembly adopted the Universal Declaration of Human Rights in 1948. This was the footing and foundation of the model subsequently developed for the protection of human rights in ulterior old ages. Since it was an initial attempt the Universal Declaration was a non-binding declaration. which means that non of the members of the United Nations were lawfully bounded. neither any organic structure of the United Nations has been given the legal right to jump. justice or countenance any legal action against the members of the United States.

However. if any province violates human rights. so its exercising will no longer be considered an internal affair and it could be brought to the docket of the chief variety meats of the UN. In this mode the sovereignty of the provinces over their citizens was restricted and the principal of non-interference in domestic personal businesss was non every bit valid as it has been in the yesteryear. ( Rittberger & A ; Zangl. 2006 ) Since the Declaration was non-binding. therefore there was no legal model. which could be enforced upon the member provinces at that clip.

In this sense the Human Rights government was non properly functional because it has no legal authorization over autonomous provinces. After the acceptance of the declaration the 2nd stage was the development of lawfully adhering model and codification of the human rights. It took about 18 old ages for the member states to hold on the International Covenant of Civil and Political rights and International Covenant of Economic. Social and Cultural rights. as they were officially adopted by the UN General assembly in 1966.

But simple blessing by the General Assembly was non plenty. as the legal binding of these two codifications will come into consequence merely when a sufficient figure of member provinces have ratified the codifications from their several houses of legislatives. This besides took more than 10 old ages and eventually in 1976 both compacts were ratified by sufficient figure of provinces. In the following 30 old ages the figure of states. which have ratified the compact has reached to 154 for the first and 151 for the 2nd compact. ( Rittberger & A ; Zangl. 2006 )

In 1993 the first UN High Commissioner for Human Rights was appointed. The High Commissioner is appointed by the Secretary General He is responsible for working with all degree of authoritiess internationally in order to accomplish the aim of protecting human rights across the Earth. In a broader sense the High Commissioner has the duty to promote and support the human rights whether they are civil. political. economic. societal or cultural. ( United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights. Office of the ( OHCR ) . 2009 )

The United Nations human rights government consists of several organic structures and programmes like the Commission on Human Rights. the Sub-Commission on Promotion and Protection of Human Rights. every bit good as several pact supervising organic structures like Committee on Economic Social and Cultural Rights. Human Rights Committee. Committee against anguish. Committee on the riddance of racial favoritism. Committee on the riddance of favoritism against adult females. and Committee on the rights of the Child.

All these commissions every bit good as the Commission of Human Rights and the Sub-Commission to Promote and Protect Human Rights are the subordinates of the UN General Assembly. There are besides several Country and Thematic Special Rapporteurs. and working groups which work under the Commission of Human Rights. Another of import organ of the Human Rights government is the International Court of Justice. The epoch of the UNCHR can be divided into to parts. the first from its foundation to 1966 and the second from 1966 to 2006. when eventually it was retired.

During the first 20 old ages the UNCHR chief operations were to outline the criterions and fix a figure of international human rights instruments. During this period the UNCHR refrained from doing opinion or allegations against any fortunes. which were considered purely domestic personal businesss of that province. unless the Security Council deemed it as menace to peace when the affair comes frontward on the Security Councils docket. During this period the Commission did non straight dealt with human rights’ complains.

Get downing with 1967 the UNCHR began to set up itself as a legal organic structure and was authorised to cover with and look into human rights misdemeanors and proctor conformity of international human rights jurisprudence by the provinces. Subsequently on the Commission broadened its sphere to economic. societal and cultural rights besides. ( Human Rights. 2009 ) The generalisation and vagueness of the articles sing human rights in the UN charter and the contradictory reading of these articles by many provinces has practically barred the UN to take any effectual action in this respect.

The same is the instance of most of UN organs. which have the duty to supervise human rights maltreatment in the member provinces. There has been a general unfavorable judgment on the effectivity of the UNCHR and its subordinates. The chief ground of the ineffectualness was because of the absence of supranational authorization. dissentious power political relations. and infliction of disabling by member provinces. which has plagued the ability of Swift and effectual UN actions in defense mechanism of human rights. ( Human Rights. 2009 ) There are many instances in which major universe powers intentionally thwarted the attempts made by the UN in order to protect their ain political involvements.

Furthermore the existent duty of advancing and protecting human rights remainders in General Assembly and its subordinate variety meats as mentioned above. Ironically neither the General Assembly nor its subordinates have any legal countenance over the member provinces. The lone UN organ with this authorization is the UN Security Council. which is non the most desirable and affectional platform to work out human rights issues. This is because many lasting Security Council members like Russia and China have the worst human rights publicity or protection record and are largely accused off human rights maltreatment within their legal power.

Therefore it is extremely improbable that they will let the Security Council to go through any declaration against their or their Alliess involvements. Resistance by China and Russia forestalling the Security Council to take action against Serbian persecution of Albanians is an illustration. ( Human Rights. 2009 ) On the contrary Security Council is sometimes accused off being manipulated by the universe powers to prosecute their ain political docket regardless of the human rights status on the capable provinces. Held. McGrew. Goldblatt & A ; Perraton. 2006 ) There have been many instances where the human rights misdemeanors were intentionally ignored by the political powers like in Sudan. where the Arab reserves virtually annihilated the cultural African population. or in Chechnya. where the Western states did non dared to step in fearing that it will exasperate Russia. or in Tibet. where China is responsible for alleged human rights misdemeanors like race murder. racial favoritism etc.

Since all the capable provinces in these state of affairss either have direct influence in the Security Council in the signifier of Veto power or they are close Alliess with those who have it is close impossible in the current fortunes that they will be held responsible for the human rights misdemeanors they have committed in the above mentioned parts. Another of import portion of the Human Rights government are the NGOs. Many international human rights NGOs like the Human Rights Watch. the Amnesty International etc has done a great occupation in foregrounding and conveying frontward several human rights misdemeanors across the Earth.

These NGOs have a singular ability of societal networking with their domestic opposite numbers in the topic province and with the aid of these domestic motions and NGOs they non merely dig out concealed or concealed human rights misdemeanors practiced by many autocratic governments in the part. but they have besides help to slander. demonise and disrepute such authoritiess and province among the multitudes. therefore doing hard for them to go on their patterns.

The New Developments in the twenty-first Century: The twenty-first century started with planetary events like the 9/11 which wholly changed the scenario and the fortunes in which the Human Rights Regime as to run. During the War against panic the United States and her Alliess set aside all the international human rights Torahs and denied to give the detainees they have caught during the Afghan war the rights of detained military forces harmonizing to the Geneva convention. They put them in an stray installation in the Guantanamo Bay and barred them from any legal assistance or proper hearing the tribunals. They were besides allegedly tortured to the worst grade.

The same happened when the U. S led alliance toppled Saddam and established a prison in Abu Ghuraib. The CIA has been accused of snaping the suspects from their places across the Earth and keeping them in private prisons run by the CIA without any proper legal powers. Most of the people in these instances were non the existent terrorist at all. All this deliberate carelessness and misdemeanor of human rights by Western states. peculiarly the United States who has championed themselves for the human rights in the last six decennaries has raised concern in the universe about the hereafter of the human rights government.

Most 3rd universe states are now compelled to believe about the dual criterions of the West sing the human rights. They now think the international human rights jurisprudence is merely another continuance Western colonialism and the West has used it to accomplish its ain involvements and penalize those who stand against them. This has farther discredited the UN Human Rights programme among the multitudes. ( Archibugi. 2008 ) In March 2006 the General Assembly voted to replace the UNCHR with the UN Human Rights Council.

The UNHRC is presently the highest UN organic structure. which proctors. promotes human rights and prevents any human right maltreatment across the Earth. It is an inter-governmental organic structure within the UN System. The troubles and disablements. which had plagued the UNCHR in the last 60 old ages. still exist in this new government. The council is simply Acts of the Apostless as an adviser to the General Assembly. which can merely advice the Security Council. where the Veto power Acts of the Apostless as the primary obstruction in accomplishing the ends sing the Human Rights.

Furthermore the United States has ever reacted negatively sing the Council. U. S. voted against it during the foundation declaration and still did non seek a place in it. United States and many of its Alliess have raised concerns sing the colored behavior of the Council against Israel in peculiar. ( Lazaroff & A ; AP. 2007 ) The overall analysis of the last 60 old ages of the Human Rights government exhibits that despite its certain failings the UN Human Rights programme has done good to set up and advance human rights across the Earth.

Get instant access to
all materials

Become a Member