George Orwell’s ‘Shooting an Elephant’ vis-a-vis ‘Uncle Tom’s Cabin’ and ‘Incidents in the Life of a Slave Girl’
George Orwell was a champion of the underprivileged and the oppressed. Through his essays, novels and journalism he amply illustrated his solidarity with the downtrodden, be it the natives of colonial Burma or the working classes of Britain or the peasantry of Soviet Russia. The protagonists in most of his works of fiction are drawn from the proletariat and in the case of ‘Shooting an Elephant’ it is an English policeman deputed for service in Burma. In the essay, Orwell narrates an incident where the policeman (perhaps himself) was forced to shoot an elephant running loose and destroying everything on its way. Although the policeman did not intend or want to kill the elephant, he was forced to do so as a way of establishing his authority over the indigenous masses. He was also compelled to oblige due to the weight of expectations generated around the only gun wielding officer in the Elephant’s vicinity. It is in this context that Orwell makes his valid observation that “when the white man turns tyrant it is his own freedom that he destroys”.
The same observation could be extended to the contexts of slavery in nineteenth century United States
Yellin, Jean Fagan.Harriet Jacobs: A Life. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Basic Civitas Books, 2004: 126. ISBN 0465092888
“The Sentimental Novel: The Example of Harriet Beecher Stowe” by Gail K. Smith, The Cambridge Companion to Nineteenth-Century American Women’s Writingby Dale M. Bauer and Philip Gould, Cambridge University Press, 2001, page 221.
George Orwell’s Shooting an Elephant is one of the best short stories to have appeared during the last days of British colonialism. Partly autobiographical in its content, the short story narrates the difficulties encountered by a colonial officer in Burma, as is sent on a mission to shoot down a rampaging Elephant which has already killed an Indian coolie. The story is portraiture on the effects of imperialism on those who perpetrate the system. This essay will argue how the story shows this role reversal, that the oppressor becomes the oppressed in the functioning of imperialism.
As Orwell notes very poignantly in the story, when the imperialists use force and authority to suppress the locals, it is the imperialists who suffer more. This is so due to two reasons. First, the imperial officer is forced to carry out acts which were to merely prove his bravado and power. Second, the unrelenting hatred directed against him by the locals takes away mental peace and .