Functionalist conflict and symbolic perspectives on education Essay

essay A+

Get Full Essay

Get access to this section to get all the help you need with your essay and educational goals.

Get Access

The footing of today ‘s theoretical positions provides sociologists with a philosophical place for inquiring certain sorts of inquiries about society and the people that occupy it. The three primary positions are functionalist, struggle, and interactionist. These three theories are really comparative to instruction and the whole acquisition procedure. These different positions allow sociologists the ability to explicate how society influences people and their actions. Each position unambiguously conceptualizes society, societal forces, and human behaviour.

The functionalist position, besides known as functionalism, states that each facet of society is mutualist and contributes to society ‘s operation as a whole. The authorities, or province, provides instruction for the kids of the household, which in bend wages revenue enhancements on which the province depends to maintain itself running. The household is dependent upon the school to assist kids turn up to hold good occupations so that they can raise and back up their ain households. With this being said, the kids become observant and taxpaying citizens, who in bend support the province. The parts of society green goods order, stableness, and productiveness. If something goes incorrect, the parts of society so must accommodate to recapture a new order, stableness, and productiveness. For illustration, the fiscal recession we are in right now, with the high rates of unemployment and rising prices, societal plans and their budgets are normally cut back because support is n’t available. Families end up holding to cut back on their disbursement and budget every bit good merely to do ends meet. Functionalists believe that society is held together by societal consensus and work together to accomplish what is best for society as a whole.

The functionalist position was popular during the 1940s and 1950s among American sociologist. American functionalists focused on detecting the maps of human behaviour and European functionalists focused on explicating the interior workings of societal order. Sociologist Robert Merton, who was born in 1910, divided human maps into two different types: manifest maps are those that are knowing and obvious and latent maps are those that are unwilled and non obvious. For illustration, my manifest map of go toing my church is to idolize, have the word, and aid kids, but my latent map may be to assist those kids learn to spot spiritual and personal positions. Manifest maps are evident, while the latent maps have a more sociological attack. A sociological attack in functionalism is the consideration of the relationship between the maps of smaller parts and the maps of the whole.

Functionalism has received unfavorable judgment for pretermiting the negative maps of something such as maltreatment. Critics claim that the position justifies the position quo and complacence on the portion of society ‘s members. Functionalism does non promote people to take an active function in altering their societal environment, even when such alteration may profit them. Alternatively, functionalism sees active societal alteration as unwanted because the assorted parts of society will counterbalance of course for any jobs that may originate.

Karl Marx ‘s Hagiographas on category battles sparked the struggle position. The struggle position nowadayss society in a different visible radiation than do the functionalist and symbolic interactionist positions. The struggle position focuses on the negative, conflicted, and ever-changing nature of society. Unlike functionalists who defend the position quo, avoid societal alteration, and believe people cooperate to consequence societal order, struggle theoreticians challenge the position quo, promote societal alteration, and believe rich and powerful people force societal order on the hapless and the less fortunate.

American sociologists in the 1940s and 1950s by and large ignored the struggle position in favour of the functionalist, the 1960s saw American sociologists gain involvement in struggle theory. They besides expanded Marx ‘s thought that the cardinal struggle in society was purely economic. Today, struggle theoreticians find societal struggle between any groups in which the potency for inequality exists such as race, gender, faith, political positions, and economic stance, etc. Conflict theorists note that unequal groups normally have conflicting values and dockets, doing them to vie against one another. This changeless competition between groups forms the footing for the ever-changing nature of society.

Critics of the struggle position point out its negative position of society. The theory attributes human-centered attempts, selflessness, democracy, civil rights, and other positive facets of society to capitalistic designs to command the multitudes, non to built-in involvements in continuing society and societal order.

The symbolic interactionist position, directs sociologists to see the symbols and inside informations of mundane life, what these symbols mean, and how people interact with each other. Although symbolic interactionist position hints its beginnings to Max Weber ‘s averment that persons act harmonizing to their reading of the significance of their universe, the American philosopher George H. Mead ( 1863-1931 ) introduced this position to American sociology in the 1920s.

Harmonizing to the symbolic interactionist position, people attach significances to symbols, and so they act harmonizing to their subjective reading of these symbols. Verbal conversations, in which spoken words serve as the predominant symbols, make this subjective reading really apparent. The words have a certain significance for the “ transmitter, ” and, during effectual communicating, they hopefully have the same significance for the “ receiving system. ” Wordss are non inactive “ things ” ; they require purpose and reading. Conversation is an interaction of symbols between persons who invariably interpret the universe around them. Of class, anything can function as a symbol every bit long as it refers to something beyond itself. Written music serves as an illustration. The black points and lines become more than merely Markss on the page ; they refer to notes organized in such a manner to do music. Symbolic interactionists give serious idea to how people act, and so seek to find what meanings persons assign to their ain actions and symbols.

Using symbolic interactionist position to the American establishment of matrimony, symbols may include marrying sets, vows of life-long committedness, a white espousal frock, a nuptials bar, a Church ceremonial, and flowers and music. American society attaches general significances to these symbols, but persons besides maintain their ain perceptual experiences of what these and other symbols mean. For illustration, one of the partners may see their round nuptials rings as typifying “ everlasting love, ” while the other may see them as a fiscal disbursal.

Critics claim that the symbolic interactionist position neglects the macro degree of societal reading or the “ large image. ” In other words, symbolic interactionists may lose the larger issues of society by concentrating excessively closely on the “ trees ” or the size of the diamond in the nuptials pealing instead than the “ forest ” or the quality of the matrimony. The position besides receives unfavorable judgment for cold-shouldering the influence of societal forces and establishments on single interactions.

All of these positions have valid points every bit good as constructive unfavorable judgment that holds value. The one position that sticks out to me is the struggle position ; to me this position is existent. I think being able to place the many things that are incorrect with our society today, makes the blows less painful when something goes incorrect. The struggle position focuses on the negative, conflicted, and ever-changing nature of society. With this being said the struggle position can besides be viewed in a positive visible radiation. Person larning about this position their eyes could be opened up to many different issues that they might non needfully experience.

Get instant access to
all materials

Become a Member