Final Project Outline Essay Essay

essay B

Get Full Essay

Get access to this section to get all the help you need with your essay and educational goals.

Get Access

1. Skid One ( Introduction ) : “Should at that place be a set of unvarying moral criterions? ” Speaker Notes: With the manner the universes is today and as the younger childs begin to maturate. they have non been taught ethical motives and if they have been taught ethical motives. they seem to go forth them at their door measure as they venture out into the universe of society. In order for society to populate in peace and harmoniousness. the United States would necessitate to make unvarying moral criterions where everyone would hold the outlook of staying by the criterions supported by Torahs.

2. Slide two: Moral Standards
Speaker Notes: Ethical motives are described as how people should act when it comes to right and incorrect. Some moral criterions could be perfectly no bias. perfectly no prevarication. and people must handle other people with regard and courtesy.

3. Third slide: Degrees of penalty.
Speaker Notes- Levels of penalty should change based on the offense committed. When 1 has a first clip discourtesy. one should have a lower degree penalty poetry person who continues to be a repetition wrongdoer. which would merit the maximal penalty. I strongly believe that if a set of unvarying moral criterions were put into topographic point the universe would be a better topographic point. Crime and corruptness would be down. Possibly they should believe about the manner that foreign states have a “set of unvarying moral criterions. ” such as if person is caught stealing they lose a finger. There will ever be people who will differ to the criterions but that is to be expected because some people merely are set in there ways but that comes with the district and they deal with the issues now so what would be the difference?

4. Fourth slide: Deciding Moral Standards
Speaker Notes- Based on a vote system. a sheet incorporating ethical motives criterions would be dispersed and the 1s that non voted for would be taken off the sheet. After a concluding reappraisal and determination. the U. S. would send on the sheet to Congress for a concrete determination and so go a jurisprudence.

5. Fifth slide: Society and Moral Standards
Speaker Notes: Society and Moral Standards would hold to be implemented and given a opportunity to work before a proper judgement could be decided. Until this happens they would be looked at in a negative manner. Even though our state is in an economic crisis. others are still traveling here because their state is in worse form than ours. With the manner of the universe today people are merely walking around in a egoistic manner worrying about them and holding no scruples of their moral or ethical answerability. Negativity seems to blight this universe like a semisynthetic disease.

6. Sixth slide: Retribution
Speaker Notes: This seems to be the lone manner to acquire people to understand what is traveling on. Standards have to be set and followed and if they are non followed or Torahs are broken so the responsible parties that are disobedient to the Torahs or criterions have to be held accountable and punished to be taught a lesson and perchance direct a message to future people who intend to make the same.

7. Seventh slide: The Supreme Court
Speaker Notes: Beings that the Supreme Court is the highest superior tribunal in the U. S. . holding them make the concluding determination on moral criterions will direct the message that the criterions are set in rock and are non unfastened for reappraisal. This gives the people a opportunity to vote and put their ain criterions that they themselves have voted in and must stay by.

8. Eighth slide: Immanuel Kant ( 1724-1804 )
Speaker Notes: Immanuel Kant ( 1724-1804 ) created the “Categorical Imperative” . in which he believed that practical logical thinking. free will. and necessary action are what drives a individual to make what they feel is right.

9. Ninth slide: John Locke ( 1632-1704 )
Speaker Notes: The freedom of faith and natural rights was promoted and endorsed by John Locke who was a immense militant. He felt that endurance continued to take a breath because of following God’s jurisprudence that coincides with a natural moral jurisprudence. He was a steadfast truster of “do unto others as you would hold others do unto you. ” If people continue to populate right so finally God’s jurisprudence will predominate.

10. Tenth slide: St. Thomas Aquinas ( 1225-1274 )
Speaker Notes: St. Aquinas was a Christian who made the Five Ways. These ways were a manner that this philosopher looked to turn out that God was existent. Bing a truster in God this philosopher had faith in what was right and what was incorrect. Cosmologic statement. moral statement. and the statement of design made up the Five Ways that this philosopher created.

11. Eleventh slide ( decision ) :
Speaker Notes: I strongly believe that if a set of unvarying moral criterions were put into topographic point the universe would be a better topographic point. Crime and corruptness would be down. Possibly they should believe about the manner that foreign states have a “set of unvarying moral criterions. ” such as if person is caught stealing they lose a finger. There will ever be people who will differ to the criterions but that is to be expected because some people merely are set in there ways but that comes with the district and they deal with the issues now so what would be the difference? No affair where we go in this universe there will be people who have good ethical motives. bad ethical motives. and some merely will non care. The bottom line is as a life species on this Earth one must be able to improvize. over come. and accommodate to their milieus whether it is to their benefit or non.

Moore & A ; Bruder. 2008 Retrieved September 15. 2010 from Axia College PHI105 web site

Get instant access to
all materials

Become a Member
unlock