Existentialism and Existence Precedes Essence Essay Essay
Born in 1905. and the author of many dramas. novels and literature. Jean Paul Sartre became a celebrated philosophical author on existential philosophy station universe war 2. ( wikipedia ) He chiefly dealt with three countries of survey and they were existential philosophy. Marxism and Anarchism. ( Basic Writings ) This paper is an effort to depict Jean Paul Sartre’s existential philosopher position. It discusses Sartre’s development of existential philosophy and the thought that destiny depends entirely upon the single picks. ( Existentialism –Jean Paul Sartre ) The other related constructs besides discussed in this paper are of being –in-itself. being-for-itself. being-for-others and bad religion.
The 2nd portion of the paper identifies how existentialist moralss are utile in an individual’s life and in an accounting profession. To get down with. the political orientation of existential philosopher minds focuses on individualism. subjectiveness. freedom and pick. ( What is Existentialism-Trends and Ideas ) However overtime. philosophers have varied their apprehension about an individual’s intent in life. and the obstructions and effects that entails them to accomplish their aim. ( Wikipedia ) As such there are two sorts of existential philosophers.
There are the Christians viz. . Jasper Gabriel Marcel. professed Catholics and Heidegger and the Gallic existential philosopher like Sartre. Many authors claims that the word existential philosophy can non be defined instead it is a shared idea. It was Jean Paul Sartre who foremost coined the definition of the construct existential philosophy in his essay “Existentialism is Humanism” . ( Sartre for novices ) To Sartre existential philosophy is a philosophy that renders human life possible. a philosophy that affirms the truth and based on human subjectivitiy ( Existentialism is in Humanism ) .
The chief political orientation of Sartre’s existential philosopher ideas are that being precedes kernel. However this could be better understood if we reverse the state of affairs kernel precedes being. ( Existentialism is in Humanism ) To explicate this. Sartre uses the illustration of a paper knife made by an craftsman who in his head the political orientation behind making the letter opener. Together with the artisan’s thoughts and the production techniques a paper knife was created. Even though the paper knife is created. it is adult male who should cognize its functionality and intent.
Hence Sartre claims that the paper knife is an kernel ( being in itself ) And the thoughts and production techniques precedes its being. Jean Paul Sartre believed that existential philosophy does non affect any supreme being therefore there is no demand to chew over about the being of God. ( Athiesm and Existentialism ) He regards that it is adult male who lays down the foundations of morality and he is the best foreman of any picks he makes in his life. This is the first rule of Existentialism. ( Existentialism is in Humanism ) Harmonizing to Sartre. since God doesn’t exist so there is at least one being whose being comes before God and that being s adult male.
( Existentialism is in Humanism ) Or as Heidegger puts it. it is human world. As such. I will briefly explicate Sartre’s ontology ( the theory of being or being ) . in relation to being in itself. being for itself and being for others. ( Stevens Chris ) Sartre identifies being –in-itself as the unconscious being. while the being- for –itself as a witting being. ( wikepedia ) Being in itself is like an object that lacks the ability to alter. isn’t aware of itself and is concrete. For illustration a tree is like an object as it doesn’t have the ability to alter or miss any consciousness.
( World Wide Web. sparknotes. com ) Further on. Sartre identifies being-in-itself as the kernel of things such as the thought of the thing. specifying the thing. its nature and maps. ( Sartre for novices ) In his book “Being and Nothingness” Sartre identifies 3 features in relation to being-in-itself. •Being in itself ( It is non caused instead is self-contained ) •It is ( non applicable to the rules of sufficient ground ) •It is what it is ( it is strictly affirmatory or positive )
To merely set. adult male exists as nil ab initio and when they surge up in the universe. they tend to specify themselves ( existential philosophy is in Humanism ) This involves the survey of being for itself – the witting being. The other type of being is the witting being. being for itself. It is described as a being with pick. Basically an person has complete freedom to make up one’s mind upon his picks. ( Extentialism and being )
Bing for itself is the being where adult male makes his ain determinations and specify his ain being through the realisation and control of being in itself. ( Extentialism and being ) Bing for itself besides claims that worlds being merely by bing with no human nature neither preset character.
The significance of being for itself is freedom. Human freedom harmonizing to Sartre is developed by the impression of non-being. Harmonizing to Sartre the for it self is able to be more than our yesteryear. to be free at the minute. to take how and is unbound by Acts of the Apostless of past to do itself to represent itself as aseries of picks each made freely in the present minute. ( Use the illustration of the bowlder ) ( www. Latrobe. com ) Harmonizing to Sartre being for itself is the witting being ensuing in who we are. The witting or consciousness helps us to make up one’s mind the picks that we make.
In being and nil cape. the writer identifies three features of being for itself. One of the features mentioned is in relation to being in itself. Bing in itself does non necessitate being for itself to be. ( speak more about the what is and what is non ) In being for itself adult male ever creates and recreates himself. This is a continual procedure boulder clay decease. ( Use the illustration of the server and he adult female ) Bing for others in Sartrean existential philosophy is that portion of human being that is societal and socially defined.
( wikipedia ) Sartre believes that in the province of being for others observes that we can non handle others as mere objects in the universe. but instead detect them as being. Sartre believes that a individual who is observed by the another individual through the “look” becomes the topic of the other person’s witting taking the latter to organize sentiments about the former. ( Stevenss ) For illustration if person caught us in the act of making something mortifying. so we find we have to specify ourselves on their footings. ( jean Paul Sartre World Wide Web. Mythosandlogos. com ) Sartre negotiations about being for others in negative footings because of the nature of being judged by others.
Nothingness doesn’t come from being initself. Coz being it iself is positive and doesn’t do anything ( Being and nothingness ) Using this construct we can now place Sartre’s existential philosopher thought that being precedes kernel. With this phrase. Sartre claims that there is no predefined kernel to humanity except that which we make of ourselves. Or in other words no human nature exists because there is no God. Thus adult male merely is. Sartre claims that adult male is nil and will achieve being when he is what he purposes. If being is anterior to essence adult male becomes responsible for what he is.
Sartre claims that persons when they choose they have to maintain in head that they are responsible for the full world. Furthermore if being precedes essence an individual‘s duty is greater as it doesn’t merely concern him but besides concerns the world as a whole. Another point that Sartre lays in forepart of us is the degree of duty of world. “Therefore. I am responsible for myself and for everyone else. I am making a certain image of adult male of my ain choosing. In taking myself. I choose adult male. ” In other words. what he does physiques on the position of adult male in general. so he is responsible for the image of world.
Sartre describes the three experiential emotions. anguish. loneliness. and desperation. and offers us his sentiment on each of them. For anguish he gives us a definition that torment is felt by a individual “who involves himself and who realizes that he is non merely the individual he chooses to be. but besides a lawgiver who is. at the same clip. taking all world every bit good as himself. ” He gives us the illustration of Abraham believing that an angel of God has ordered him to give his darling boy. Isaac. this shows the torment of seeking to move justly without of all time being able to procure any conclusive grounds of what is the right class of action.
The 2nd emotion. loneliness. Sartre says that it is “very straitening that God does non be. because all possibility of happening values in a Eden of thoughts disappears along with Him ; there can no longer be an a priori Good. since there is no space and perfect consciousness to believe it. ” The 3rd and last emotion. desperation. is the realisation that we can non finally trust on anyone else for anything. It is a instead distressing realisation. “
But. given that adult male is free and that there is no human nature for me to depend on. I can non number on work forces whom I do non cognize by trusting on human goodness or man’s concern for the good of society. ” Bad religion is a philosophical term introduced by Jean Paul Sartre to mention to any kind of ego misrepresentation which denies the being of human freedom. ( Wikipedia. Bad Faith and Falleness )
Harmonizing to Sartre. Bad Faith occurs when some one attempts to apologize our being of actions through faith. scientific discipline or some other belief system. ( Bad religion and Falleness ) Existentialists claim that persons have the freedom to take and be able to find their ends.
( Wikipedia ) The freedom to take in itself is what entails us to set up Bad religion. The term freedom which is “condemned to be free” is the really being of the being for itself. An single must therefore everlastingly take itself and hence do itself. ( Sartre’s existential philosophy and Human emotions ) Harmonizing to the construct of bad religion. freedom is used in two different manners severally. An person can utilize freedom non to take. in order to avoid covering with the effects of that freedom and the duty that goes along with it. ( Bad religion and Falleness ) .
On the other manus an person can be limited by 1s facticity. ( wikepedia ) Facticity is a construct that is closely related to freedom and makes up of one’s yesteryear. A denial of one’s yesteryear ( being –in-itself ) is to move in conformity with bad religion. Thus an person limited by one’s facticity can take him to do a witting pick in torment every bit good as acknowledge the effects if there are any. ( wikipidea ) The construct of torment is one of Sartre’s cardinal thoughts in Extentialism as Humanism. It involves the realisation that the determination an single makes besides has impact on others.
( Existentialisation in Humanism ) Anguish is besides about acquiring over the selfishness and covering with a duty for oneself every bit good as for others. ( Existentialism-definition World Wide Web. wordiq. com ) For illustration a military officer who orders is military personnels to travel to the conflict must carry through his responsibilities as good his military personnels and higher-ups. He knows his determinations are based out of anguish but he has duties to carry through for himself every bit good as to his higher-ups and his military personnels. ( Existentialism in Humanism ) To explicate how bad religion operates. Sartre wrote in his book about a adult female who had the pick of whether to travel out on a day of the month with a suer.
The demand for picks becomes even more as she knows the outlook of the man’s desires. In the narrative. the adult male places his manus upon the adult female. As such doesn’t make any moves nor indicates any kind of filtration. Thus this leaves her with doing a witting pick every bit good as avoiding to take duty of the state of affairs along with avoiding the effects. This state of affairs of the adult female as Sartre believes is to populate and move in bad religion. THE WAITER IN BAD FAITH ‘Let us see this server in the coffeehouse. His motion is speedy and frontward. a small excessively precise. a small excessively rapid.
He comes toward the clients with a measure a small excessively speedy. He bends frontward a small excessively thirstily ; his voice. his eyes express an involvement a little excessively solicitous for the order of the client. Finally there he returns. seeking to copy in his walk the inflexible stiffness of some sort of zombi while transporting his tray with the foolhardiness of a tightrope-walker by seting it in a perpetually unstable. perpetually broken equilibrium which he perpetually re-establishes by a light motion of the arm and manus. All his behavior seems to us a game.
He applies himself to associating his motions as though they were mechanisms. the one modulating the other ; his gestures and even his voice seem to be mechanisms ; he gives himself the adeptness and remorseless celerity of things. He is playing. he is diverting himself. But what is he playing? We need non watch long before we can explicate it: he is playing at being a server in a coffeehouse. “This abstract is sourced from the book “Being and Nothingness” utilizing the 1996 right of first publication infusion from Vincent Spade” The survey of being for it self identifies that persons have the freedom make picks to the degree it will assist them accomplish that end.
This freedom harmonizing to Sartre is sometimes limited depending on our facticity. Our factity is made of our past – and our yesteryear is limited in fortunes such as topographic point of birth. day of the month of birth etc… As Sartre puts it one’s facticity should non be a repeating job for one’s nowadays. For illustration a group of pupils went on a hiking and on their manner they came across a bowlder which blocked their way. ( Sartre for novices ) Jean Paul Sartre became a self-declared existential philosopher and based his cardinal thought that being precedes kernel. ( World Wide Web. Sartre. org/existentialism )
With this puzzling phrase. Sartre argues that world first exists as nil. and so as they surge up in the universe they become responsible for their ain actions. ( being precedes kernel by Jacobs D ) It can farther be claimed that there is no predefined kernel to humanity except that which we make for ourselves. And as such Sartrean existential philosophy does non admit the being of God. therefore enabling worlds the freedom to be able to take for themselves. ( Major constructs in existential philosophy ) Sartre claims that the kernel defines what we do which leads to who we are.
And this kernel is non fixed instead a continual procedure of specifying oneself till decease. ( Existence precedes kernel ) Basically the construct of being predating kernel is of import as it plays the justice of good and evil. If things merely are without directing intent so the truth will be merely as a projection of that which is a merchandise of being. For truth to be. being has to be before it. doing it non the predecessor but the swayer of its ain objectiveness. ( Major constructs in existentialism- reword the sentences )