Essay on Jury

Lawsuits – College

What are the six procedural steps to any lawsuit? A law suit refers to a request to the court to determine a dispute. It generally involves the following steps; Rejection of any efforts for alternative solution to the dispute from the defendant by the plaintiff. This is followed by filing a complaint in the requisite […]

Read more
Gun Control and Historical Thinking

District of Columbia v Heller was a landmark case based on possession of firearms as it is in the Second Amendment of the United States Constitution. The main issue was the interpretation of the Second Amendment; something that had never been handled at court level in previous years. In the case, the court put it […]

Read more
Snyder V. Turk

Snyder v. Turk p40 Procedural History: Lower court entered a directed verdict for Dr. Turk b/c there was an absence of evidence that he intended to inflict personal injury Directed verdict: a ruling by a trial judge taking a case from the jury b/c the evidence will permit only one reasonable verdict (after trial) -testing […]

Read more
LAW and Morality

Law and the social structures in which it operates are variables which by necessity must interact. Neither can be understood in isolation from the other, and most legal systems are both discretionary and idiosyncratic of the particular society in which they operate. The discretionary element of legal systems has often been criticized for a number […]

Read more
Important Characters

Angry Men, Juror number three is a man of strong opinions, very little patience, and a strong annoyance of the whole trial taking place and the other people Involved. To start of the play, juror number three shows his impatience by complaining, “Six days. They should have finished in two. Talk, talk, talk. Did you […]

Read more
Scottsboro Boys

On the night of March 25, 1931, a sheriff posse in Paint Rock, Alabama stopped a freight train traveling from Chattanooga, Tennessee. They arrested nine young black men on the train. They also found two young women, Victoria Price and Ruby Bates, dressed in men’s overalls. Price claimed she was raped by six of the […]

Read more
Trial by jury within the English legal system

The English Legal system began in the year 1215 under the Magna Carta, which was then signed by King John. Pursuant to Article 39 of the Magna Carta:”No free man shall be arrested, or imprisoned, or deprived of his property, or outlawed, unless by legal judgement of his peers, or by the law of land”The […]

Read more
Jury Trial within the English Legal System

The Jury system throughout England is one, which manages to give the public the chance to play a vital part in the legal system. This gives you the chance to see what is going on throughout the law and informs you what happens in court. You, as a juror will usually be involved in the […]

Read more
Cultural Values of 12 Angry Men

Culture, which is the language, beliefs, values, norms, and behaviors, is around us everyday, all the time. To understand culture, social facts are necessary to know. Social facts are patterns of behavior that characterize a social group, which includes values, norms, and sanctions. In the movie, 12 Angry Men, the jury as a group is […]

Read more
12 Angry Men Questions

1. Make you believe that the jury in this film came to the right determination? Why/why non? I think that the jury in this film came to the incorrect determination. because I feel that all throughout the deliberation the factual grounds did non hold any sensible uncertainty lingering above it. which was the complete antonym […]

Read more
Ignorance of the Law

In the civil code of the Philippines republic act no. 368 this maxim is in article 3. When we say ‘Ignorance of the law’, we refer not only to the literal word of the law itself but also to the meaning or interpretation given to said law by our court of justice. This maxim also […]

Read more
Judicial Notice

Judicial notice is a rule in the law of evidence that allows a fact to be introduced into evidence if the truth of that fact is so well known or established that it cannot be refuted. This is done upon the request of the party seeking to have the fact at issue determined by the […]

Read more
Many Rivers to Cross

June Jordan’s essay entitled, “Many Rivers to Cross” talks about racism and injustice in the voice of Jordan herself.   It demonstrates her personal experiences to emphasize the reality of oppression that were prevalently being experience by most black women. The essays also contain several narration of Jordan’s life story that highlighted several instances of […]

Read more
Court Observation

My courtroom observation was completed at Supreme Court of New South located at Phillip Street, Sydney. The proceeding that I chose to attend within the Court was listed in the Commercial List, at courtroom 11C. On arrival to the court, I was stopped at the security checkpoint where guards checked my books and asked me […]

Read more
The Two Towns of Jasper

The documentary, “The Two Towns of Jasper,” was excellent in my mind for many different reasons. It told of a black man being chained to the back of a pickup for three miles by three white men. The documentary consisted of good interviews, captive images, and the information was quality and factual. First, the interviews […]

Read more
Chain Of Custody

Chain of Custody refers to the chronological documentation or paper trail, showing the seizure, custody, control, transfer, analysis, and disposition of evidence, physical or electronic. Because evidence can be used in court to convict persons of crimes it must be handled in a scrupulously careful manner to avoid later allegations of tampering or misconduct which […]

Read more
OJ Simpson: An Unfair Verdict

In 1995, OJ Simpson was tried for the murder of Nicole Brown Simpson (his ex-wife) and her friend, Ron Goldman. Surprisingly, the twelve jurors found OJ Simpson not guilty in spite of a lengthy and highly publicized trial. I believe the jury’s not guilty verdict was a result of many reasons. The defendant was a […]

Read more
Caudle v. Betts

The plaintiff, Ruben Caudle, was employed as a salesman at Bett Lincoln-Mercyry in Louisiana. While at a Christmas party, the defendant engaged in horseplay with an electric automobile condenser, which he used to shock the plaintiff on the back of the neck and chased him with it. The plaintiff was able to escape the defendant […]

Read more
Adversarial or Inquisitorial: Which Mode of Trial System is Better?

Our present day legal systems have acquired a series of rules designed to level out to some extent the inescapable imbalance of power between the accused and the state.

Read more

Get instant access to
all materials

Become a Member