Conflict And Functionalist Theories In Religion Sociology Essay Essay

essay B
  • Words: 1807
  • Category: Database

  • Pages: 7

Get Full Essay

Get access to this section to get all the help you need with your essay and educational goals.

Get Access

“ The difference between struggle and functionalist theories on faith are: *Conflict theory refers to religion as “ the suspiration of the laden animal, the sentiment of a hardhearted universe, and the psyche of the soulless status. It is the opium of the people ” .

Functionalism is a structural-consensus position that positions society as a system. As its name implies this theory seeks to specify the separate establishments of society in footings of how they function to keep the societal system. It should be noted that sociological research into faith does non try to uncover the enigmas of the supernatural, nevertheless whilst seeking to understand the function of faith within society some theoreticians have been drawn to instead unfaithful decisions.

Emile Durkheim, the establishing male parent of functionalism, claimed that all societies divide the universe into the sacred and the profane. He observed that even apparently ordinary objects, for case a wooden cross, could arouse deep emotions, though they held no intrinsic power. For Durkheim the significance of such objects was symbolic, and for Durkheim the wooden cross did non stand for forfeit and ageless redemption, as with all spiritual iconography it represented the ‘collective scruples ‘ , the shared set of beliefs that bind society together.

One common manner to specify faith is to concentrate on what are known as functional definitions: these are definitions which emphasize the manner faith operates in human lives. When building a functional definition is to inquire what a faith does – normally psychologically or socially.

Functional definitions are so common that most academic definitions of faith can be categorized as either psychological or sociological in nature. Psychological definitions focus upon the ways in which faith plays a function in the mental, emotional, and psychological lives of trusters. Sometimes this is described in a positive manner ( for illustration as a agency of continuing mental wellness in a helter-skelter universe ) and sometimes in a negative manner ( for illustration as with Freud ‘s account of faith as a type of neuroticism ) .

Functionalists argue that the function of faith is to continue the position quo instead than to advance societal alteration. They agree that faith is a good conservative force because it maintains consensus, binds people together and promotes societal order. They nevertheless see it as holding a positive influence, whereas the Marxist position is slightly more negative in its mentality. ( Particularly when looking at societal alteration )

It is impossible to see how faith can be working to socialize the bulk of societies members into morality, and integrating in the twenty-first century, when merely a minority of people attend church and of class when some of the attendants these yearss engage in anti moral and antisocial behavior and to a big extent ample per centum of people particularly the immature teens are been exposed to some of these moral dangers. Having said this, it could be observed that functionalists tend to pretermit the countries in which faith has been dysfunctional for society for illustration in Northern Ireland and Bosnia, spiritual divisions have caused break and struggle instead than promoted societal order.

Another pertinent point that can be argued is that the station modernist believes that the old sociological hunts for the expansive accounts of societal behavior and values are unpointed. They believe there are no absolute truths, and values in society are merely comparative 1s, this is due to the fact that society is more disconnected due to modernization, and there are besides

assorted political orientations to take from. Along with this added pick non-traditional beliefs and behaviors are being adopted. Peoples now select their beliefs like they select life styles and leisure activities, a good illustration is the construct of consumerism.

This displacement off from the traditional has a immense impact on faith harmonizing to postmodernists. Religion no longer holds the function of advancing societal solidarity and societal order that the functionalists argue to be the instance. Alternatively faith has become a individualized entity ; it has become pick and mix in a sense. Peoples are going more cognizant and unfastened to new thoughts ; this could explicate the growing in new spiritual motions.

Religion has to switch harmonizing to the demands of the people in different societal contexts. Theologically, from the Bible for case God recommended in the establishment of matrimony a unique and acceptable brotherhood between a adult male and a adult female in the book of Genesis which has serve as a criterion for a piece in some portion of the universe but as a consequence of adult male insatiate pursuit for new thoughts, experience and escapade we now have what we call “ cheery matrimony ” which many states are now institutionalized and drafted into the constitutional right of the people.

Undoubtedly, faith had a outstanding place in early functionalism. Harmonizing to Comte, the macrofunctionalist, it prompted simple common people to function unobserved intents that even clever bookmans could hardly observe. Durkheim ( 1912 ) proposed that faith sacralised societal life itself and, because the position of society was inexplicit in all knowledge, faith therefore served as the foundation of all cognition. The micro functionalist Malinowski ( 1948 [ 1925 ] ) observed that faith established, fixed, and enhanced single attitudes that were valuable to the corporate being and endurance of societies-attitudes such as fear for tradition, harmoniousness with the environment, and bravery in the battle with troubles and at the chance of decease.

However, many of these maps that used to be the trademark of faith could no longer continue the cardinal pillar of the society canon that seems to be falling apart or possibly, gnawing. The Irish society can be cited as an illustration of a dedicated spiritual province for many decennaries, which as a consequence service as a manner of modeling and orienting people in a peculiar way of societal values and norms but unluckily in today ‘s universe all of these norms and values are gnawing quickly and accordingly peoples ‘ manner is now perverse, the act of terrorist act is now a life style, statistic has revealed dismaying rate of people perpetrating or about to perpetrate self-destruction due to issues related to emotion emphasis and fiscal issues merely to advert a few, fundamentally these are some of the hole that faith used to make full absolutely in the bosom of people.


However, it is besides true that from the cardinal position that faith could alleviate societal anxiousness, that it could supply a sense of security when people are faced with unmanageable state of affairss. Malinowski observed that when the island-dwellers fished in the composure laguna, no spiritual pattern was attached, nevertheless when faced with the hazards of fishing in the unfastened ocean, spiritual rites were ever performed. In this manner, Malinowski believed worlds could exercise a sensed control over a universe in which they held no important, single, power.

Apparently, this is non truly the instance any longer why because the greatest job of insecurity that is most at hand all over the universe now can be traced to the fragmented faith religious order been propagated Islamic fundamentalist which has changed the universe order and shaped how we lived our lives enormously and accordingly make a tense and uneasy atmosphere instead than the secure, hopeful and calm outlooks postulated by functionalist school of ideas.

Possibly the most utmost functionalist appraisal of faith has been put frontward by the American sociologist Robert Bellah. Bellah has fused Parsons statement that America derives its values from Protestantism and added that to Durkheim ‘s belief that the worship of God is the cloaked worship of society making the construct of a ‘civil faith ‘ . Bellah believes that what unifies Americans, whichever faith they may be is an overarching civil faith ; a religion in Americanism and non needfully necessitate non incorporate supernatural belief, Bellah maintains that in America it does. For case “ God Bless America ” is a common phrase, American Presidents swear an curse before God and American currency pronounces to the universe “ In God We Trust ” . However this God is non the God of any peculiar credo but a God of America. In this regard religion in America unites all the American peoples.


In analysing faith, functionalists argue that faiths serve a figure of maps, such as: they preserve and integrate society, create communities of trusters, promote societal control, provide replies to ultimate inquiries, provide us with rites of transition, and cultivate societal alteration. Religions may besides be dysfunctional in some respects. The struggle position suggests that faith is a tool used by the elite to repress the multitudes.

The functionalist and struggle positions have a figure of practical applications, such as supplying a nexus to the apprehension of an full civilization and acquisition much about a peculiar community. Not least Durkheim ‘s anticipation of the ‘cult of adult male ‘ . Certainly modern spiritual phenomena such as holding a ‘personal relationship with Jesus ‘ , spiritual tendencies such as Wicca or even the rise of the tele-evangelist are grounds that faith is going less societal and more personal. Whether this is mere happenstance or cogent evidence of Durkheim ‘s anticipation is at the really least problematic, but certainly it is the human ability to inquiry and admiration that ab initio gave rise to faith.

Apparently, in the times past faith as the functionalist postulated every bit served as a consolidative factor, dictator of position quo, canon of values, bind people together, advance societal order and so on in many society but things are altering fast, faith has become so disconnected non merely to the extent of gnawing the societal values that it stood for in the custodies of extremist fundamentalists to commit panic in the name of faith but it has besides facilitate uncountable exposure of people particularly the immature teens who are vulnerable to diverse moral dangers, the rapid instances of pedophiles across the Western hemisphere is a good illustration.

Basically, huge bulk of people have lost religions and hope in what used to be a consolidative force in the society, people have been wounded both emotionally and psychologically. Rather than adhering people together and advancing societal order, faith has left more people in a province of disillusioned. It can be competently concluded that cosmopolitan functional demand can neither be served by faith nor can religion be the exclusive endurance and upholders ‘ of any system in a modern society as one time believed by the functionalist bookmans.

Peoples now have individualistic adorement as against the cosmopolitan faith that used to find the manner be think, respond and populate in term of our value system an 500 one of such things is sport specifically football which has all of a sudden turned to some sort of “ God ” . Obviously, there is a paradign displacement from the old values that used to keep any social system together from the functionalist position to the modernistic epoch where engineering and other things now determines value system.

Get instant access to
all materials

Become a Member