Achievement goal theory: ‘An athlete’s motivation should always be to aim to be the best’

essay A+
  • Words: 3306
  • Category:

  • Pages: 13

Get Full Essay

Get access to this section to get all the help you need with your essay and educational goals.

Get Access

“Success and failure are non concrete events. They are psychological provinces consequent on the perceptual experience of making or non making goals” ( Maehr & A ; Nicholls. 1980. p. 228 ) . The quality of an athlete’s sporting experience is shaped by the manner in which success is defined. and by how capablenesss are judged ( Duda. 1993 ) . Achievement Goal Theory ( AGT ) ( Nicholls. 1984 ; 1989 ) outlines that people are motivated by the desire to fell competent. Peoples can specify competency and success in different ways. the chief 1s being self-importance and undertaking orientations.

Research is consistent in demoing the motivational benefits of a task-orientation. either singly or in combination with an ego-orientation. In order to maintain jocks involved in athletics. success must intend being the best every bit good as undertaking command and personal betterment ( Duda. 1993 ) .

Pulling from past research. I will build an essay to back up the statement: ‘An athlete’s motive should ever be to take to be the best’ . I will foremost sketch of import renters of AGT. in peculiar self-importance and undertaking orientations. attack and turning away ends. motivational climes. and TARGET guidelines. Second. I will utilize this information to supply a brief analysis of the motivational manner that a manager of the Varsity rugger conference squad ;

Brent. performs. and the effects this manner has on a peculiar 18-year-old jock ; Justin. Finally. I will depict specific theoretically based schemes that can be used by Brent. to accommodate a more right motivational ambiance for Justin and his squad. Coaches play an of import function in finding the types of motivational orientations jocks perceive ( Ames. 1992 ) . Part 1: Theoretical Understanding.

Harmonizing to AGT ( Nicholls. 1984. 1989 ) . in achievement state of affairss the end of participants is to show competency or avoid showing incompetency. AGT recognises at least two attacks jocks may follow to judge their ability within a featuring context. A focal point on comparing oneself to others ( ego-orientated ) or a focal point on one’s ain attempt and betterment ( task-orientated ) Athletes. who are ego-orientated. perceive ability as restricting the effects of attempt on public presentation ( Nicholls. 1989 ) . Here athletes show their high capacity of ability frequently at the disbursal of attempt.

Nicholls ( 1989 ) states that ego-orientated persons judge their ability relative to others. and seek to show superior ability or outperform others to be satisfied. Those who are extremely task-orientated usage cues such as degrees of attempt and undertaking completion to measure their competency. in a self-reflective mode. Here the jock is satisfied if they perform to a degree that reflects how they have mastered a undertaking or made personal betterments ( Ames. 1992 ) .

Much research points to the advantage of being task-involved when take parting in athletics and other achievement-related activities ( Ames. 1992 ; Duda. 1993. 2001 ) . Positive results include wellness. wellbeing. and societal and performance-related factors. When athletes report being task-oriented. they persist longer at featuring undertakings. they are more occupied with their preparations. and they use more effectual cognitive processing schemes ( tennis ) . In comparing. ego-oriented ends may take to negative results. such as the inclination to drop out of athletics ( Duda & A ; Balaguer. 2007 ) .

Adaptive cognitive. affectional. and behavioural forms are features of task-orientated jocks every bit good as for those who are ego-oriented but who have high perceived competency or ability. Maladaptive spiels are predicted for ego-oriented persons who have low perceived ability ( Nicholls. 1989 ) . Athletes become predisposed to task and ego orientations because of societal factors in their athletics ( i. e. the manager ) . and these orientations will later act upon what end penchant an jock will follow in a specific state of affairs ( Duda & A ; Balaguer. 2007 ) .

Elliot ( 1999 ) & A ; Pintrich ( 2000 ) province that undertaking and self-importance ends are each divided into attack and turning away ends. In footings of undertaking ends. task-approach oriented jocks are interested in accomplishing command of a undertaking ; in contrast. task-avoidance oriented jocks are interested in avoiding misconstruing the undertaking. In footings of self-importance ends. ego-approach oriented jocks are interested in showing that they are more competent than other jocks ( i. e. . hold more ability than others ) ; in contrast. performance-avoidance orientated pupils are interested in avoiding looking incompetent or stupe.

It is of import to observe that jocks can keep multiple ends at the same time ; therefore. it is possible for an jock to be both task-approach oriented and ego-approach oriented ; here. this athlete truly wants to larn and get the hang the stuff but is besides concerned with looking more competent than others. The nature of the end province ( degrees of undertaking and ego-orientation ) that is activated in a specific athletics state of affairs will be determined by single penchant ( end orientation ) every bit good as situational cues ( motivational clime ) .

Harmonizing to Roberts ( 2001 ) constructs of competency are determined by both dispositional and situational factors. Research acknowledges that both students’ single features and contextual influences affect the types of ends that pupils follow in assorted larning environments. Surveies indicate that the environments in which athletes learn act upon their end orientations in of import ways ( Dweck. 1986 ; Cury. Biddle. Famose. Goudas. & A ; Sarrazin. 1996 ; Spray. 2000 ) . Whether an jock is more task- or ego-orientated in athletics depends partially on the motivational clime created by managers.

This can besides be of two types: a command or task-oriented motivational clime. and a competitory or ego-oriented motivational clime ( Ames. 1992 ) . In this respect. jocks who have stronger ego-goal orientations are more likely to comprehend an ego-oriented athletics clime. whereas those with a dominant task-orientation are more likely to comprehend a task-oriented motivational clime.

The instructional patterns that are used in preparations have an impact on the types of end orientations that athletes adopt ( Ntoumanis & A ; Biddle. 1999 ) In a task-oriented motivational clime. the manager emphasises cooperation. wagess players’ attempt. and ensures that everyone feels that they have clear and of import functions to play on the squad. When errors are made. the manager responds with information on how to rectify the mistake. Here. managers are more likely to bring forth jocks who are confident. coachable. willing to work hard for normally agreed upon ends. and who enjoy their athletics.

In an Ego-orietated motivational clime. the manager emphasises competition between participants. has a low tolerance for errors. and has front-runners amongst the participants. This environment has been related to jocks holding greater public presentation anxiousness and diffidence and other behaviours which are counterproductive ( Duda. & A ; Balaguer. 2007 ; Ntoumanis & A ; Biddle. 1999 ) .

In a task-orientated clime jocks experience greater enjoyment and self-pride. and reported less anxiousness than in ego-involving climes. Athletes besides report greater intrinsic motive to play their athletics when their managers promote undertaking engagement ( Duda. & A ; Balaguer. 2007 ; Ntoumanis & A ; Biddle. 1999 ) .

Another critical country that defines the prevailing motivational clime is the type of feedback given to jocks. The task-orientated clime will hold responses that emphasize attempt. betterment and skill command. The ego-involving clime will concentrate on the win-loss record and the athlete’s ability. In a given context. if a manager negotiations about and truly focal points on command. betterment. and self-comparisons. so jocks are likely to follow command ends. and to comprehend a undertaking end construction during preparation.

In contrast. if a manager invariably talks about accomplishment degrees. game tonss. and who is making the best ( or the worst ) . so jocks are likely to follow public presentation ends. and comprehend a public presentation end construction at preparation.

An athlete’s motive should be to endeavor to be the best. but it is the perceptual experience of what is meant by ‘being the best’ that the jock must be concerned with. Coachs can play an of import function in finding what athletes perceive as being the best It is hence of import to supply the right types of ends. in the right type of motive clime.

Epstein ( 1989 ) identified that the undertaking. authorization. acknowledgment. grouping. rating. and clip ( TARGET ) structures as influential factors that can find the motive clime. Epstein ( 1989 ) developed a taxonomy as a manner of summarising and supplying order to the assorted dimensions. Later. Ames ( 1992 ) adopted the TARGET acronym to summarize the constructions that foster a mastery motivational clime in achievement state of affairss. and accordingly. expose positive forms of behaviors in jocks.

The Task ( T ) dimension outlines the design of the acquisition activities. The Authority ( A ) dimension refers to the type and frequence of engagement in the decision-making procedure. The dimension of Recognition ( R ) concerns the usage of wagess to recognize advancement and accomplishment. The Grouping ( G ) dimension respects the manner in which jocks are divided into groups.

The Evaluation ( E ) dimension involves the methods. criterions. and standards used to measure acquisition. The Time ( T ) dimension concerns the rightness of the clip demands. the gait of direction. and the clip designated to finish undertakings. This theoretical account can be used to place and plan a acquisition environment to assist develop jocks perceived competency. enjoyment and purposes to take part.

Conversely. Ego-orientated climes are created when jocks are non given varied undertakings. the manager maintains authorization. jocks are recoginised for their ability relative to others. homogenous ability groups are used. rating is based on normative patterns. and clip for task’s completion is inflexible ( Duda & A ; Balaguer. 2007 ) .

The command TARGET constructions of undertaking. grouping. and clip have shown to hold the greatest positive consequence on peoples activity degrees ( Bowler. 2009 ) . I will now utilize the discussed theoretical premises to supply a brief analysis of the motivational manner that a manager Brent employs. and the effects this manner has on an jock ; Justin. Part 2: Case Study ; a Brief Analysis.

Justin. an jock in Brent’s squad. is non basking conference every bit much as he has in the yesteryear. Justin believes it is the coaching manner and squad environment. which has caused this alteration in motive. Brent. a cub manager. feels that his experience he has had as a participant and from holding been coached himself by a figure of different managers. will take him to be a successful manager. It is apparent from the instance survey and from the literature that Brent’s motivational manner is negatively impacting Justin’s motive. to the point that he seems certain to drop out of the athletics wholly.

It would advantage Brent to be more task-orientated during his coaching ; he presently employs an ego-orientated motivational manner. His ego-orientated motivational clime can be categorised into the six dimensions of the TARGET taxonomy ( Epstein. 1989 ) . As a dimension of ( T ) Undertaking: Brant does non underscore single challenge or active engagement during his fittingness preparation and he dominates conversations by explicating what he thought went incorrect.

As a dimension of ( A ) Authority: Brant does non inquire for input from the squad sing developing drills and he does non give the participants much of a opportunity to give their sentiments. As a dimension of ( R ) Recognition:
Athletes are recognised for their ability relative to others during fitness Sessionss instead than on attempt as a sensed index of accomplishment. As a dimension of Grouping ( G ) : homogenous groups are apparent when comparing new and bing squad members ; there is a sense of an ‘us and them’ atmosphere.

As a dimension of Evaluation ( E ) : the manager bases rating on fittingness degrees instead than attempt. with no tools to develop the patterned advance towards single ends. and eventually as a dimension of Time ( T ) : the clip the squad has for undertaking completion is inflexible. he expects speedy patterned advance of accomplishments and fittingness. every bit good as this. his Sessionss are all planned out in progress non leting appropriate clip demands.

These ego-orientated patterns that Brent employs. has created a motivational clime that is of a extremely ego-orientated nature. This will act upon the types of end orientations that Justin adopts. The nature of the end province will be determined by single penchant every bit good as the motivational clime.

Justin’s motivational penchant seems besides to be extremely ego-orientated. There is a high opportunity that this is a map of Brent’s ego-orientated instructional patterns ( motivational clime ) . Justin believes that in order to be successful he has to concentrate comparing himself with others either during fitness preparation or in higher acknowledgment state of affairss ( i. e. taking to do national representative squads ) .

Justin shows public presentation anxiousness and diffidence. He does non experience like he has been given the chance to better his conference accomplishments. and is worried about losing his topographic point on the NZ rep squad. Rather than endeavoring for task-orientated ends. he is exposing an ego-goal orientation.

Another consequence of holding an ego-goal orientation in athletics is that Justin may comprehend his ability by restricting the effects of attempt during preparations. This deficiency of attempt may be the ground for his deficiency of game clip. Justin besides displays an ego-avoidance orientation ; here Justin is interested in avoiding looking incompetent. He feels the lone ground he is still playing is that he would experience guilty if he did non see the season through to the terminal.

It is still early on in the season and although things do non look to be traveling good for Justin. there is still hope yet. I will cognize describe specific schemes that I would promote Brent to utilize to construction a more adaptative ‘motivational’ athletics environment for Justin Part 2: Case Study ; Strategies for a more adaptative ‘motivational’ athletics environment.

I believe Brent demands to reflect of the current coaching manner and do alterations to certain facets. and if possible up-skill ( i. e. a coaching class ) . In order to construction a more adaptative ‘motivational’ athletics environment for Justin and his squad I would promote Brent to plan schemes to heighten task-involvement. Brent could use the TARGET ( Epstein. 1989 ) conceptualisation. which represents the six constructions of the accomplishment context to act upon his athlete’s motive.

These situational constructions are assumed to be mutualist ; one dimension can hold direct deductions on another dimension within the construction.

I will now explicate how Brent can construction a more adaptative motivational clime utilizing the principals of the TARGET guidelines. As a dimension of undertaking. Brent could supply the jocks with tools to assist put self-referenced procedure and public presentation ends. For illustration. Brent may desire to enter the jocks initial and station fittingness trials tonss ( i. e. Time it takes to run 3km ) to supply jocks with single times. Here the demand of the undertaking is to underscore single challenge. This besides recognises that single ability can be a sensed index of accomplishment.

As a dimension of authorization. Brent could promote input from his squad by directing inquiries to jocks during reappraisal Sessionss ( e. g. “how do you think we could better on our public presentation from Saturday’s game” ) or acquiring single jocks to name out the tackle count for a set of six tackles during defensive drills. This would be a great chance to put up jocks like Justin. because it provides active engagement. while besides constructing assurance and leading accomplishments.

As a dimension of acknowledgment. Brent could near each participant during the preparation session to speak through single schemes. advancement. and rating. This gives single feedback that can advantage jocks like Justin. As a dimension of grouping. Brent could utilize differing grouping agreements.

For illustration set uping groups by which province of beginning squad they support. what state they are from. or which place they play ( i. e. a forward ) . By sub-dividing groups under similar features can back up concerted grouping agreements. As a dimension of rating. Brent could promote jocks to convey a notebook to preparation as a manner of entering their ain personal betterments. Brent should besides admit command of undertakings and compliment good attempt instead than comparing athletes’ accomplishment degrees against each other.

As a dimension of timing. Brent needs to recognize that athlete’s advancement through accomplishments and fittingness at different degrees. a good manager must provide for all jocks by supplying optimum timing restraints. This may affect being unfastened to developing drills come oning longer or shorter than what he had planned for.

By using Epstein ( 1989 ) conceptualisation of the TARGET guidelines to further a task-involving motivational clime. jocks will see greater assurance. enjoyment and self-pride. Athletes will besides be more intrinsically motive to play conference. An athlete’s motive should ever be to take to be the best. It of import that Brent can alter his ain perceptual experience of what he defines as the best from his current ego-involved definition to a more task-orientated definition. Making this type of clime will hopefully assist develop his ain athletes’ perceptual experiences of competency and heighten their sporting experience.

In decision. this essay has outlined some specific theoretical premises of the achievement end theory. and how these can be used to understand athletes’ behavioural forms in athletics. The coach-created motivational clime can play an of import function in act uponing athletes’ reading of their engagement in athletics. Whether this influence is more positive or negative appears to depend on the grade to which the motivational atmosphere the manager establishes is more or less task-involving and ego-involving. I was able to measure Brent’s current motivational manner utilizing the TARGET taxonomy and its effects this manner has on a jock ; Justin.

Finally. I was besides able to indicate out specific schemes of the TARGET taxonomy to assist Brent make a more task-orientated motivational coaching clime. In making so I have been able to back up the statement that ‘an athlete’s motive should ever be to take to be the best’ . by admiting that ‘best’ can be defined from task-orientated ends.

Ames. C. ( 1992 ) . Achievement ends and the schoolroom motivational clime. In J. L. Meece & A ; D. H. Schunck ( Eds. ) . Student perceptual experiences in the schoolroom ( pp. 327-348 ) . Hillsdale. New jersey: Erlbaum. Bowler. M. 2009. The influence of the TARGET motivational clime constructions on pupil physical activity degrees during twelvemonth 9 sports lessons. Paper presented at the British Educational Research Association Annual Conference. University of Manchester. 2-5 September. 2009. Cury. F. . Biddle. S. . Famose. J. . Goudas. M. . Sarrazin. P. & A ; Durand. M. ( 1996 ) .

Personal and situational factors act uponing intrinsic motivatiuon of adolescent misss in school physical instruction: A structural mold analysis. Educational Psychology. 16: 305-315. Duda. J. L. ( 1993 ) Goals: A societal cognitive attack to the survey of achievement motive in athletics. In R. N. Singer. M. Murphey and L. K. Tennant ( explosive detection systems. ) . Handbook of Research on Sport Psychology. pp. 421–436. New York: Macmillan. Duda. J. L. ( 2001 ) . Achievement end research in athletics: Pushing the boundaries and clear uping some misinterpretations. In G. C. Roberts ( Ed. ) . Progresss in motive in athletics and exercising ( pp. 129-182 ) . Leeds: Human Kinetics. Duda. J. L. . & A ; Balaguer. I. ( 2007 ) .

The coach-created motivational clime. In S. Jowett & A ; D. Lavalee ( Eds. ) . Social psychological science of athletics. Champaign. Illinois: Human Kinetics. Dweck. C. M. ( 2000 ) . Predicting engagement in non-compulsory physical instruction: Do end positions matter? . Perceptual and Motor Skills. 90: 1201-1215. Elliot. A. J. ( 1999 ) . Approach and turning away motive and achievement ends. Educational Psychologist. 34. 169-189. Epstein. J. ( 1989 ) . Family constructions and pupil motive: A developmental position. In C. Ames & A ; R. Ames ( Eds. ) . Research on motive in Education. Vol. 3. New York. Academic Press. Maehr. M. L. and Nicholls. J. G. ( 1980 ) ‘Culture and achievement motive: A 2nd look’ .

In N. Warren ( ed. ) . Studies in Cross-cultural Psychology. Vol. II. pp. 221–267. New York: Academic Press. Nicholls. J. G. ( 1989 ) . The competitory ethos and democratic instruction. London: Harvard University Press. Nicholls. J. G. ( 1984 ) . Achievement motive: Concepts of ability. subjective experience. undertaking pick. and public presentation. Psychological Review. 97. 328-346. Ntoumanis. N. . & A ; Biddle. S. J. H. ( 1999 ) . A reappraisal of motivational clime in physical activity. Journal of Sports Sciences. 17 ( 8 ) . 643-665. Pintrich. P. R. ( 2000 ) . The function of end orientation in self-regulated acquisition.

In M. Boekaerts. P. R. Pintrich. and Zeidner. M. ( Eds. ) . Handbook of self-regulation ( pp. 451–502 ) . San Diego. Calcium: Academic Press. Roberts. G. C. ( 2001 ) . Understanding the kineticss of motive in physical activity: the influence of accomplishment ends on motivational procedure. In G. C. Roberts ( Ed. ) . Progresss in motive in athletics and exercising ( pp. 1-50 ) . Champaign. Illinois: Human Kinetics. Spray. C. M. ( 2000 ) . Predicting engagement in non-compulsory physical instruction: Do end positions matter? Perceptual and Motor Skills. 90: 1207-1215.

Get instant access to
all materials

Become a Member